Leftist science. They’re pathological liars.
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (29)
sorted by:
Still none of this text justifies a misleading graph. You’re still spewing bullshit.
If you don't understand it it's not their fault.
Скуби-Ду знает не так много, как думает.
Is that the best you could do to deflect from being called out on obvious bullshit?
Two MSc holders and eighteen PhDs have written an 11 page study
Patrick Moore, Bullshityouharder, CanadianWrongy, and ScoobyDoo do not contest the data in the study,
Their complaint, folks, is that people who can't understand the study will be fooled by the layout of one of the six tables and figures in it. As though they picked up the study just to look at the pictures in it.
Put it another way: I wonder why they think that people who can't understand what the study is saying will be reading it in the first place.
More gibberish. Yes, the authors are smart. And they also purposely created a misleading graph. You’re implying that misleading graphs are normal. They’re not. This is not how it’s done. You’re full of shit and you’re trying to justify your bullshit by deflecting to something irrelevant. You know this too. In case you don’t, read about misleading graphs here:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misleading_graph