One of this website’s retarded users posted this.
Of course, seatbelts have zero risk of causing injury or death if you don’t get into an accident. A covid vaccine can cause severe injury or death, whether you get covid or not.
One of this website’s retarded users posted this.
Of course, seatbelts have zero risk of causing injury or death if you don’t get into an accident. A covid vaccine can cause severe injury or death, whether you get covid or not.
The old "It can never happen to me" argument folks.
Yeah, shitting someone elses pants is not something thats ever been observed. Correct and you didnt even need a source
After years of use it's mystifying how anyone can still ignore that the vaccines reduce the severity of the disease and therefore reduce the load on the healthcare system.
August 2023 National Center for Biotechnology Information "The risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes reduced after receiving the booster"
August 2023 National Center for Biotechnology Information "Vaccination remains a crucial strategy to mitigate the severity of the disease and reduce mortality rates"
January 2023 The Lancet "COVID-19 vaccination is effective at preventing severe illness and complications during pregnancy"
November 2022 The Journal of Infectious Diseases "OVID-19 vaccination was associated with lower rates of ICU admission and in-hospital death in both Delta and Omicron periods compared with being unvaccinated."
*correction
I’m the dumb fuck who claims 7 MILLION people died from “Possible Covid”, doctors guessed that flu symptoms were not Influenza flu, so they reported Covid, 💰
No lab tests.
Folks, that mean we have 7 MILLION “Possible” Influenza deaths ✊🏾
Holy shit.
Tuchodi really is a dumb fuck for claiming 7MILLION people died from possible Covid
Fucking embarrassing
Agreed.
Its a very idiotic comparison.
If it was on the wrists (new method of seatbelt never before used-- MRNA) and you had to wear it or lose your job, even without the other normal seatbelt being worn, even when not in a car, expressly for protecting other people who get in accidents in other vehicles
It wouldn't make it through the trials.
What trials?
The trials for your imaginary seatbelts.
The comparison comes from when the government made seatbelts legal, there were people who didn't want to be told what to do from the government, and people ultimately died because they were stubborn.
User u/urallfucked posts misleading personal opinions
seatbelt manufacturers can be sued in the event of malfunction or death, they do not benefit from immunity
seatbelts do not induce heart disease as a side effect after use
seatbelts can be removed
a government tracking app was never mandated to use a seatbelt
Is she pretending there is absolutely no recourse in the case of vaccine damage. folks? Or is she just upset that the Vaccine Injury Support Program is different?
Is she pretending that seat belts can't cause injuries at the same time they are reducing injuries from motor vehicle accidents?
This is where she should be producing data about vaccine injuries folks, so we know how serious she thinks the issue is.
Like social insurance numbers, driver's licenses, and health care cards, not to mention debit and credit cards, loyalty cards, cell phone pings, cookies, super cookies, IP addresses, website codes, tracking bugs, login activity data, user agents, HTTP referrers, and so forth?
But trying to get a handle on a global pandemic - that's a problem for her.
The parallel is that seat belts, like vaccines, reduce damage & therefore the load on the healthcare system. At least that's what the science shows, until someone comes up with something other than tweets, memes, pseudo-science, and tabloid web sites that say otherwise.
It took 30 years for seatbelt laws to be instated in Canada
Seems like a decent enough time to make sure something actually works before forcing it upon the public wouldnt you agree, fucktard?
Those people were dumb too.
Also, no i’m not eager to follow government orders. I’ll pass on that one.
She's having trouble with the concept of relative risk folks.
According to her. Stated without proof. The risk of death from covid is real.
"While residual confounding bias remained after adjusting for several individual-level and community-level risk factors, no increased risk was found for non-COVID-19 mortality among recipients of three COVID-19 vaccines used in the US."
"There is no increased risk for mortality among COVID-19 vaccine recipients."
"These findings do not suggest an association between vaccination and overall increased mortality"
"Safety data from more than 298 million doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine administered in the first 6 months of the US vaccination programme show that most reported adverse events were mild and short in duration."
No proof required for any reasonable person to know that your seatbelt analogy is retarded.
But if you’re going to pretend that vaccines don’t cause injuries just like seatbelts, without a link, here’s a link for you:
So yes, a seatbelt analogy would be appropriate if covid vaccines had no risk. That’s not the case. That’s why it’s retarded.
On a side note, when your above links specifically state that there have been deaths from covid vaccines, but give no numbers, while later stating that there is no risk of death from covid vaccines relative to unvaccinated people, do you just nod your head without questioning the absurdity of such contradictions?
lack of proof =/= lack of evidence. Especially when you reason you cannot trust certain sources because theyre under critique by the very people they're whistleblowing against
There you have it folks. You're supposed to take her word for it that covid vaccines cause death. No discussion about the relative risks of death/injury from covid vaccines vs death/injury from covid.
and
I said seatbelts reduce injuries. I did not say seatbelts don't cause injuries. "Seatbelt injury, also called seatbelt syndrome, is a group of common injury profiles associated with the use of seatbelts".
My point - which hasn't been addressed directly so far - is that seatbelts and vaccines reduce injuries.
No link. No quote. Until she backs her statement up I'm going to assume she's misinterpreting something.
Stay tuned folks.
Perhaps re-read the post description. Zero risk of injury or death when you DON’T have an accident.
Probably best to understand what you’re replying to before replying.
And, yes, the seatbelt analogy still stands as retarded.
They’re your links. I assume you read it and are now playing dumb.
Another "It will never happen to me" believer folks,
And she can't prove what she claims they say.
I can:
"While residual confounding bias remained after adjusting for several individual-level and community-level risk factors, no increased risk was found for non-COVID-19 mortality among recipients of three COVID-19 vaccines used in the US."
"There is no increased risk for mortality among COVID-19 vaccine recipients."
"These findings do not suggest an association between vaccination and overall increased mortality"
"Safety data from more than 298 million doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine administered in the first 6 months of the US vaccination programme show that most reported adverse events were mild and short in duration."
Post a stupid saying when you realize your seatbelt analogy is retarded.