Red states do not get public support from taxes that blue states do. This leads to all kinds of social issues and child poverty. Federally the blue run fed gov in the us abuses red states to ensure poverty. It's a form of get in line politics.
When you over tax gas and various systems it is mostly felt by the poor. The rich could care less. So federally adding a carbon tax makes the poor feel pain.
When federal policies cause the price of fuel to rise it's an attack on the poor. That affects everything from groceries to rent.
Michael Hendrix works at a right-wing think tank. He's entitled to his opinion but he'd be out of a job if he supported Biden. And an extraordinary response to a global pandemic does not fit into the routine nature of your claim that "Red states by nature are often denied financial support". Let's have some day-to-day examples to justify the use of "often".
You didn't read that book, did you? The subtitle is "How Red State Leaders Have Failed Their Citizens and Undermined America". Go back and have another look.
Nothing to do with the transfer payments to the states that I can see: "The goal of this paper is to adjudicate between these three diverse explanations of regional variation in divorce, using county level information obtained from public data sources and appropriate statistical models."
Red states do not get public support from taxes that blue states do
Your book link explains that: "The red states follow the conservative bent of less is better. Less government, less taxation, less money for education, health, road repairs and pollution controls make for a Republican paradise."
Your post reads like AI having an inability to reconcile complex thoughts.
Dismissing the NY Post, one of the oldest newspapers in the US is very telling. By not addressing the facts of the story but attacking the messenger you are producing propaganda.
By disconnecting the thread you are dismissing that the argument as a whole leads to a thesis outcome.
By sending tax money to blue states blue leaders are robbing the poor of red states through taxes to feed the rich of blue states. The rest of the links support the thesis that red states are systematically robbed by blue leaders to punish them. The book on how red states fail their constituents is to show how blue state propaganda is used to blame the victims of federal theft.
The overall argument regarding why red states are denied services to address poverty can lead to additional financial hardship leads to the article that discusses poverty as the primary source of child abuse claims.
In the end it's the fault of blue fed gov policies that end up causing excessive child abuse claims in red states because poverty is considered a form of neglect.
I repeat: "an extraordinary response to a global pandemic does not fit into the routine nature of your claim that "Red states by nature are often denied financial support". Let's have some day-to-day examples to justify the use of "often"."
By sending tax money to blue states blue leaders are robbing the poor of red states
See above. Let's have some day-to-day examples to justify the claim that "Red states by nature are often denied financial support".
The overall argument regarding why red states are denied services to address poverty
That's explained in the book you referenced: "The red states follow the conservative bent of less is better. Less government, less taxation, less money for education, health, road repairs and pollution controls make for a Republican paradise."
In the end it's the fault of blue fed gov policies that end up causing excessive child abuse claims in red states
By causing gas prices to rise it is an attack on the poor. The federal governments should address this inequity.
Pierre Trudeau - a "blue" politician - set up Petro-Canada as a crown corporation in 1975 in an attempt to do just that. A "red" government under Brian Mulroney started the process of returning it to private industry in 1991. Look it up. And in the States the idea of government interference in the free market is seen as socialism by most and communist by some.
Do you have any proof for that statement?
https://money.com/covid-19-vaccination-rates-low-income/
https://nypost.com/2021/03/10/massive-1-9-trillion-bill-is-a-bailout-for-blue-states/
https://medium.com/the-straight-dope/red-states-much-worse-than-you-think-and-they-pretend-heres-the-proof-a7aa7b12c72a
https://paa2011.populationassociation.org/papers/111705
Red states do not get public support from taxes that blue states do. This leads to all kinds of social issues and child poverty. Federally the blue run fed gov in the us abuses red states to ensure poverty. It's a form of get in line politics.
When you over tax gas and various systems it is mostly felt by the poor. The rich could care less. So federally adding a carbon tax makes the poor feel pain.
When federal policies cause the price of fuel to rise it's an attack on the poor. That affects everything from groceries to rent.
Nothing about financial support in that link. It's about "lower-income Americans".
Michael Hendrix works at a right-wing think tank. He's entitled to his opinion but he'd be out of a job if he supported Biden. And an extraordinary response to a global pandemic does not fit into the routine nature of your claim that "Red states by nature are often denied financial support". Let's have some day-to-day examples to justify the use of "often".
You didn't read that book, did you? The subtitle is "How Red State Leaders Have Failed Their Citizens and Undermined America". Go back and have another look.
Nothing to do with the transfer payments to the states that I can see: "The goal of this paper is to adjudicate between these three diverse explanations of regional variation in divorce, using county level information obtained from public data sources and appropriate statistical models."
Your book link explains that: "The red states follow the conservative bent of less is better. Less government, less taxation, less money for education, health, road repairs and pollution controls make for a Republican paradise."
Your post reads like AI having an inability to reconcile complex thoughts.
Dismissing the NY Post, one of the oldest newspapers in the US is very telling. By not addressing the facts of the story but attacking the messenger you are producing propaganda.
By disconnecting the thread you are dismissing that the argument as a whole leads to a thesis outcome.
By sending tax money to blue states blue leaders are robbing the poor of red states through taxes to feed the rich of blue states. The rest of the links support the thesis that red states are systematically robbed by blue leaders to punish them. The book on how red states fail their constituents is to show how blue state propaganda is used to blame the victims of federal theft.
The overall argument regarding why red states are denied services to address poverty can lead to additional financial hardship leads to the article that discusses poverty as the primary source of child abuse claims.
In the end it's the fault of blue fed gov policies that end up causing excessive child abuse claims in red states because poverty is considered a form of neglect.
https://firstfocus.org/blog/poverty-and-child-neglect-what-we-know-and-what-we-need-to-do
By causing gas prices to rise it is an attack on the poor. The federal governments should address this inequity.
I repeat: "an extraordinary response to a global pandemic does not fit into the routine nature of your claim that "Red states by nature are often denied financial support". Let's have some day-to-day examples to justify the use of "often"."
See above. Let's have some day-to-day examples to justify the claim that "Red states by nature are often denied financial support".
That's explained in the book you referenced: "The red states follow the conservative bent of less is better. Less government, less taxation, less money for education, health, road repairs and pollution controls make for a Republican paradise."
You seem unaware of the political realities in the US. The "blue fed gov policies" provide support, and the reds want to remove it: Republicans Declare Banning Universal Free School Meals a 2024 Priority, and "Republicans have repeatedly pushed to cut, privatize, or even end Social Security"
Pierre Trudeau - a "blue" politician - set up Petro-Canada as a crown corporation in 1975 in an attempt to do just that. A "red" government under Brian Mulroney started the process of returning it to private industry in 1991. Look it up. And in the States the idea of government interference in the free market is seen as socialism by most and communist by some.