2
AlphacideXXX 2 points ago +2 / -0

“the corpse at every funeral, the bride at every wedding and the baby at every christening.”

Matches his Jesus complex for sharing a Birthday.

1
AlphacideXXX 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ole Annamie may end up cannibalized on July 20th.

I will need more popcorn as she gets spit n' roasted... by her own party. 😂

Green Party is on suicide watch...

P.S. - keep ye pets close to home...

13
AlphacideXXX 13 points ago +13 / -0

HAHAHAHA!!!

OMFG this is becoming totally retarded.

I am at least enjoying the comedy of fanaticism, offered during intermissions.

Hurricane Vaccine Promotional Ads 😂

1
AlphacideXXX 1 point ago +1 / -0

Another month or so and the World's meat supply is going to be shot down

Sounds like an great time to try and sell us bugs and lab meat.

Living the dream. 😂👍

2
AlphacideXXX 2 points ago +2 / -0

I wish I could find the original video or that I downloaded it in the first place.

I didn't think we would get this far. I definitely underestimated the stupidity of people and I placed to much hopium in others maintaining the distribution of factual exposure of glaring inconsistencies.

1
AlphacideXXX 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/210310/dq210310c-eng.htm

From January to mid-December 2020, there were an estimated 296,373 deaths in Canada, representing an excess of 13,798 deaths above and beyond what would have been expected had there been no pandemic. This is about 5% more deaths than expected in that period, after accounting for changes in the population, such as aging, and about 7% more deaths than the 277,276 observed within the same time frame in 2019.

https://files.catbox.moe/pzs0xj.jpg

It's funny how Statisca and Macrotrends match the 296,373 at the end of 2020 and the upward trend matches the trend identified in their projections but you can accept the backflips presented that Covid resulted in a notable increase to overall Death Totals.

The Death Total increases are within the expectations that were ALREADY projected prior to Covid.

Compare the numbers of all. They don't change but the accessment has.

1
AlphacideXXX 1 point ago +1 / -0

Historical Data is raw data.

Projections are calculated data.

Macrotrends provided BOTH.

Impacts of Covid-19 were not isolated from within the Historic data and not added to the projected data.

Your understanding of those 2 terms and the disclaimer is flawed.

2
AlphacideXXX 2 points ago +2 / -0

No, it's not. You have to be blind to not see that on their website

You want to be a fuck. Let's play.

You ARE both referencing the projected AND the HISTORICAL data and mixing the fucking 2 separate sets of Data.

HISTORICAL DATA is NOT PROJECTED.

I acknowledged my mistake on Statistica.

YOU are the one who can calm the fuck down and actually LOOK at the HOSTORICAL data included.

2
AlphacideXXX 2 points ago +2 / -0

I deleted this reply with a correction related to statistica.

Please look at my reply related to macrotrends.

3
AlphacideXXX 3 points ago +3 / -0

I have resolved myself either way.

Die with principles or a miracle presents itself, that saves us.

The very, very real potential that Hell on Earth will soon rise has already previously desensitized me.

6
AlphacideXXX 6 points ago +6 / -0

I will guarentee that certain countries would be the last to disarm and suddenly have a change of heart, at the 11th hour, as they recognize their newly acquired nuclear dominance Worldwide.

2
AlphacideXXX 2 points ago +2 / -0

If Ham is a glowie, then you can bet the entire .win Network is too.

and that would make us totally fucked.

For now, I'll just continue hoping he is crazy, like most of us on here. ??

2
AlphacideXXX 2 points ago +2 / -0

1.) You never addressed my comments related to PREP and HIV.

The treatment can create super strains directly as a result of the TREATMENT.

2.) Significantly more effort was afforded to using Africa as Guinea pigs for improperly introduced vaccine experimentation than providing clean drinking water and food.

Polio, a highly infectious disease that spreads through contaminated water or food.

Africans hate The gates foundation with a passion for exploiting them for medical research and having extensive Vaccine damages. There is extensive evidence in both Africa and India of the Gates Foundation acting in bad faith with devastating consequences.

2.) Discrepancies

A molecular clock analysis timed the emergence of the precursor to the Epsilon variant to May of 2020 in California.

Your initial reference was of epsilon appearing in July, your current reference is to epsilon appearing in May. I have scanned multiple different "studies" with dates all over the place. I even corrected your date of Oct for Alpha, It was September as that appears to be the consensus... on average.

The only evidence you've provided to back that statement up is for one variant, the Epsilon, and it appears to be incorrect.

NO, it is YOU who were found incorrect. See response #3.

Do you not find these multitudes of discrepancies of dates by official sources to be highly disturbing?

3.) Pfizer Data

Well, no. The list of variants we're discussing only had one entry from the US: the Epsilon variant. It appeared in May 2020.

Well YES.

PHASE 3 Pfizer Clinical Trials began in July. "Early" Stage Trials began BEFORE.

https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2020/05/05/health/pfizer-vaccine-coronavirus.amp.html

For Christ sake. HUMAN Trials were under way well before. "Early" Stage Trials began immediately in Moderna.

https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2020/03/16/first-human-trial-for-coronavirus-vaccine-begins-monday-in-the-us.html

What I find most disturbing is your ability to ignore mass discrepancies and cherry picking of data from a select STAGE.

Let's stick to the topic at hand: the lack so far of evidence of a causal relationship between the variants and the vaccines. We can talk about the Gates Foundation in another thread.

YOU will not direct my conversation in the direction that is most covient to YOUR conclusions.

4.) Vaccine Hesitancy researcher.

 > WHY are you here.

To see if claims that the MSM is lying to me are supportable. It's OK to have a wide variety of opinions on a subject because it makes for a healthy discussion, but at some point facts have to be produced. Otherwise - as somebody said - "That which is stated without evidence can be dismissed without evidence"

YOU have not questioned or acknowledged ANY issues related to the Covid Vaccines, in which the actually are gene therapies, NOT Vaccines.

YOU ignore facts.

YOU cherry pick data, by stage.

YOU dismiss FACTS as they inconvenience YOUR conclusions.

YOU are an easily discernable Agent of Misdirection.

FURTHERMORE

Is it lost on you that we live in the information age and NOT one News Network or Media Network covered the progression of Covid Vaccination Trials, from the beginning? I would have expected a live Documentary to be presented in this era of the Reality Show.

However, News and Media were lightning fast on presenting a pre-assigned narrative, from the beginning. Of which, they failed to present an accurate account of origin OR progression. Of which they, have flip flopped on a regular basis, in response to noticed anomalies.

Grey's Anatomy and several other "shows", that are created and aired by the same Networks that present our "News", left no time in presenting a pre-dispositioned narrative of events and conclusions, with NO factual data to represent those views clearly defined.

In many cases BOTH News and Media afforded an inaccurate set of criteria while at the same time stating "the science is ever changing" as an excuse.

This occurred while ZERO in depth coverage was offered of on the ground events at the same time, before and after, and continues to this day.

My toleration for incompetence and those who excuse it is gone.

ADDITIONALLY,

PLEASE view the Total Death rate of Canada over the last 20 years and that of 2020 and you will note NO SIGNIFICANT change to the TOTAL. Be sure to account for incremental increase due to the Boomer generation entering die off as that is the trend in play.

GO MANIPULATE somewhere else. YOU are a bad faith actor, here with a maligned purpose.

IN OTHER WORDS. FUCK OFF, YOU ARE A LIAR.

7
AlphacideXXX 7 points ago +7 / -0

We all know they will be coming for us at some point (or you should know this).

Likely through threats for "anti"-covid, "anti"-vaccine or anti-Trudeau speech.

Or

They will attempt to eliminate our access by blocking the site.

1
AlphacideXXX 1 point ago +1 / -0

Working on the foundation, then I will be looking for peeps who are interested in what i present. ?

3
AlphacideXXX 3 points ago +3 / -0

The person I was conversing with, appears to be a "Vaccine Hesitancy researcher" as CTV covered.

Vaccine Hesitancy researchers will be appearing on sites to research why people are hesitant and the best ways to manage (manipulate) people into taking the Vaccines.

The fact this is happening, that they are clearly saying they are doing it on Public News is beyond disturbing.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›