Have they determined that all drag queens are not a danger? I'm not sure you can assert that all priests are a danger but drag queens are not. Seems very much either case is asserting something that can't be proven true universally

Man the NDP is a one trick pony.

Maybe they could work on something more like runaway immigration causing Toronto to bust at the seams?

There would be no reason to expand like this if immigration was halted for a few years to let new cities be built with real commuter rail solutions that could move those populations around more efficiently

Whataboutism strikes.

Maybe it's "Dark Biden"?

Maybe the NGOs working to inspire fires should cut their budget too.

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/study-shows-84-wildfires-caused-humans-180962315/

Man made climate change is real

Well if you mean climate change inspired goons lighting fires in forests that may burn your house down it may be possible:

https://torontosun.com/news/local-news/warmington-cops-suspect-arson-caused-wildfire-in-at-least-one-part-of-quebec

Two interesting stats:

https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=CA&q=Pericarditis&hl=en-US

https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=CA&q=Myocarditis&hl=en-US

Interesting that search term analytics for both myocarditis and pericarditis spiked after the vaccine rollout. Prior to that period very few people had ever heard of either condition.

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/myocarditis.html

CDC admits that both conditions are side effects of the COVID vaccines

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9419896/

So what you are saying is Heart and Stroke foundation advises you ignore pericarditis as it will often "get better in a few days on its own".

That's your advice? Are you saying people should ignore a possible viral infection? I wouldn't ever say that - you may want to ask the H&S folks to stand behind that statement.

Because the shots were never tested to reduce transmission,

https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-pfizer-vaccine-transmission-idUSL1N31F20E

They say after the fact that it did releave symptoms, which is tenuous at best because it's based on opinions from studies in China, that bastion of reliability that produced studies that were later retracted:

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)32656-8/fulltext

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(23)00691-8/fulltext

What I find interesting is the lies spread about treatments like HCQ were retracted as well:

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2820%2931180-6/fulltext

So all those thousands of fake articles demonizing treatments were based off of lies spread by 'science'.

I wonder how many of the copy paste articles referenced are sourced from these studies in whole or in part?

https://www.foxnews.com/science/covid-19-papers-retracted-lancet-new-england-medical-journal

Looks like the company couldnt provide evidence to support their claims.

I wonder how many other studies are based on fraudulent data like these?

Is there a specific article you are referring to or are you spreading some of that ol' misinfo?

People die from pericarditis as a leading indicator. There is no such thing as a 'mild' case, unless you are trying to cover something up.

https://www.physiciansweekly.com/pericarditis-tied-to-mortality-morbidity-risks/

It is a leading indicator of future more serious outcomes like transplant. The surgeon I worked with said most often the patients he performs transplants on had pericarditis in their past. He only performed 2000 or so surgeries as I recall so maybe he didn't know what he was talking about.

Pericarditis is never a 'mild' condition.

It can kill you.

Anyone using the term 'mild' when referring to pericarditis or myocarditis is trying to sooth concerned souls probably because the association mandated the shots.

I was told by a heart transplant surgeon I worked for 20 years ago the number one leading cause of heart replacement was pericardium infection.

50c fuel tax doesn't affect the price of fuel?

They wouldn't have an excuse to raise rates if the gov didn't raise taxes on fuel creating inflation and increase immigration beyond the capacity of our housing market.

So you are blaming property owners for runaway inflation which is caused by fuel taxes?

Can't blame them when costs are doubling yearly. In fact the rate increases are lower than inflation.

Property owners are driven by supply and demand. With scarce supply the demand is high and costs because of inflation are high as well.

Stop excessive unwarranted taxing and stop issuing visas and the problem will stop.

In addition to fuel costs it's also fueling inflation to destroy seniors savings accounts.

Soon cat food will be scarce.

If you have kids or dogs I'm glad they didn't catch the monkeypox.

The two bot accounts are from some foreign nation paid to run disinfo / misinfo countering (propaganda) on multiple boards for five eyes NGOs. They punch in a theme into an AI chatbot prog and pump out garbage.

This is why they are so repetitive and verbose.

Remember HamSandwich?

Wonder what happened to him?

What I learned from History class is never get on the train.

I wonder if CBC is going to investigate the almost over 70 churches burned with hateful intent?

So the term leaky vaccine comes up when a vax fails to stop infection and causes immunity tolerance to scale. Do the new igg4s cause sickness and transmission?

Could this lead to possible generation and cancers since the liver is generating new dna from rmna (https://www.lunduniversity.lu.se/article/qa-covid-19-vaccine-study-gains-attention)?

Why does the shot contain SV40? (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccine_contamination_with_SV40)(https://twitter.com/ShortShort_News/status/1651903903246716929).

Could this ransmit a viral cancer causing version of itself?

It all just seems to be what has been warned about since the launch of the shots.

I once used to work at a hotel in Ottawa. No one ever cared what the price of a meal was because they were never using their own money.

That is our leadership.

I was wondering why post American sources when you are referring to Canadian audiences. Those have no relevance in context to the unique environments and challenges faced by Canadian audiences.

Try using relevant sources for the audience. It comes across as political if you post from the perspective of a non resident which may be the reason that responses to your posts are hostile.