Why do I need to link to it? why don't you just type "Canada unvaccinated travel ban" or something similar into google?
Since you're unaware of the Liberal travel ban, and you're incapable of using google, here it is.
https://omegacanada.win/p/15Hv72Q2CK/tuchodi-is-too-stupid-to-google-/c/
Are you too stupid to know about the travel ban?
You comment is further proof there is no evidence supporting your mandate, and it’s simply a political cudgel.
I just want the evidence of the estimated effectiveness of the mandates.
I don’t believe for a split second they have saved one life (even if they had I still oppose them)
Without evidence it seems obvious the ban at best s based on a guess, and more likely political.
You don’t get to subvert human rights based on guesses and political calculations.
Until I see evidence otherwise, your lack of providing it will be taken as an admission it does not exist.
You’re claiming the travel mandates protect the healthcare system (this goal is not mandated in the constitution by the way however freedom of movement is)
“Prove it”- where is the evidence of the effectiveness of this strategy in reaching the goal?
Further what metric will be used to remove the mandate?
Or do we just have to wait until liberals gut feeling says it’s safe? (Which of course will be never)
What was my claim?
I just want the evidence used to measure the effectiveness of the mandates.
I’m not infringing human rights, the Liberals are.
They’re the ones responsible for defending their infringements not me.
Of course I was being facetious
Not enough, I want the science that shows the real world effectiveness of the infringements of constitutional rights.
Or you could just admit there is no evidence.
That’s why I want you to show the scientific evidence your side is using to justify the travel bans
But they’ll defend a PM who wore Blackface on countless occasions
Why is it that you require a random internet user to provide you links?
Why do you need that to defend your segregation? Why not just defend it with specific science?
I’d like nothing more for you to be fired from your job and not permitted to travel, without any evidence that the restrictions have an effect.
Then when it upsets you, you get called a drama Queen.
It’s the least you deserve.
Is that how science works?
Why isn't natural immunity or negative tests good enough for travel here, unlike other countries?
Science? Where’s the proof? Oh wait you have none, just your baseless claims.
Lol rich coming from a Liberal.
The drama queens are the ones freaking out over the flu, LARPing that it’s the plague.
What % of Canadian population died of covid? 0.00001%?
Also you could click on the multiple MSM articles calling your mandates BS, but you don’t comment on those because they prove you wrong
You’re the side who wants rights infringed, the onus is on your side to provide links but you refuse
You’re the one who wants rights infringed.
The burden of proof is on your side.
The reason you refuse to provide that evidence is because there is none.
In this forum you can find links to multiple MSM stories and explaining that the mandates are ineffective.
Are you able to click on those?
A triple-vaccinated 70-year-old with diabetes, for instance, would still have a higher risk of hospitalization than an unvaccinated 30-year-old. Of course, discriminating against the ability to travel based on age would be unethical. So wouldn’t discriminating based on risk of severe disease be unethical, too?
WHERES THE SCIENCE FOR YOUR TRAVEL BANS
Archive link: https://archive.ph/SU3RM
You’ve never provided evidence justifying a lockdown on the unvaccinated.
You show hospital stats, but where are the studies demonstrating the measures are effective?
How many lives are being saved by not allowing healthy people to travel?
What will it take to open up? Specifically- what is the metric? Please provide a link the circumstances under which the federal travel restrictions will end.
You provide plenty of links, why not a link to the evidence backing up the travel bans?
Of course it’s because there is no evidence travel bans on the unvaccinated is necessary, as anyone with the slightest shred of intelligence knows.
If it’s not necessary why would you support it?
Because for you this isn’t about science, it’s about politics, and you’ll always defend any policy of Justin Trudeau including the divisive the policy of segregation, also known as apartheid.
I need a scientific study for the travel bans NOW
At least by refusing to provide the data you've admitted there is none.