Your own link references a science study that says vaccination is recommended, because "Seropositivity for anti-N antibodies should not be interpreted as protection from future infection." - meaning just surviving covid is not enough - and goes on to recommend getting vaccinated.
Why is that not good enough for you? It's not the opinion of some individual article writer. It's the result of the analysis of 5 recent months of data from 50 US states plus some territories, involving many tens of thousands of individual cases, by a team of trained scientists.
Why isn't natural immunity or negative tests good enough for travel here
Hospital records show that unvaccinated people are a greater burden on the healthcare system. Today's numbers from Ontario hospitals show 21% of the covid patients come from the 10% of the population that is not vaccinated.
Unvaccinated people should not be packed tightly into enclosed spaces breathing recirculated air with people who could be carrying the virus.
POSTING INACCURATE REPORTING AGAIN TUCHODI? Not very scientific don’t you think? Why keep posting ONTARIO DASHBOARD when you know it has a disclaimer warning that their reporting is incomplete and inaccurate. Why are you knowingly posting inaccurate reporting Tuchodi?
Dr Zain Chagla, infectious diseases specialist confirms VACCINE STATUS IS IRRELEVANT IN THE ICU.
A triple-vaccinated 70-year-old with diabetes, for instance, would still have a higher risk of severe illness and hospitalization than an unvaccinated 30-year-old. Of course, discriminating against the ability to travel based on age would be unethical.
Why isn't natural immunity or negative tests good enough for travel here, unlike other countries?
Science? Where’s the proof? Oh wait you have none, just your baseless claims.
Your own link references a science study that says vaccination is recommended, because "Seropositivity for anti-N antibodies should not be interpreted as protection from future infection." - meaning just surviving covid is not enough - and goes on to recommend getting vaccinated.
Why is that not good enough for you? It's not the opinion of some individual article writer. It's the result of the analysis of 5 recent months of data from 50 US states plus some territories, involving many tens of thousands of individual cases, by a team of trained scientists.
Is that not science enough for you?
Not enough, I want the science that shows the real world effectiveness of the infringements of constitutional rights.
Or you could just admit there is no evidence.
Your own post links to a study that shows that vaccination is the best protection. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/mm7117e3.htm
Hospital records show that unvaccinated people are a greater burden on the healthcare system. Today's numbers from Ontario hospitals show 21% of the covid patients come from the 10% of the population that is not vaccinated.
Unvaccinated people should not be packed tightly into enclosed spaces breathing recirculated air with people who could be carrying the virus.
It's pretty simple.
Tuchodi posts: ”vaccination is the best protection.” FALSE.
1. THE FULLY VACCINATED HAVE THE HIGHEST RATE OF COVID INFECTIONS
FACT
2. THE COVID VACCINE FAILED 85% OF HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS
3. Dr Zain Chagla, infectious diseases specialist confirms VACCINE STATUS IS IRRELEVANT IN THE ICU.
.
POSTING INACCURATE REPORTING AGAIN TUCHODI? Not very scientific don’t you think? Why keep posting ONTARIO DASHBOARD when you know it has a disclaimer warning that their reporting is incomplete and inaccurate. Why are you knowingly posting inaccurate reporting Tuchodi?
Dr Zain Chagla, infectious diseases specialist confirms VACCINE STATUS IS IRRELEVANT IN THE ICU.