Win / OmegaCanada
OmegaCanada
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
NoNewNormal
MillionDollarExtreme
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
Win uses cookies, which are essential for the site to function. We don't want your data, nor do we share it with anyone. I accept.
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
OmegaCanada Formerly known as r/MetaCanada
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

8
Brownstone Institute : The Triumph of Natural Immunity ————————————————————— Tuchodi, why aren’t negative covid tests or proof of natural immunity sufficient? Provide a link to evidence (www.google.com)
posted 1 year ago by CanadianRighty 1 year ago by CanadianRighty +8 / -0
14 comments share
14 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (14)
sorted by:
▲ -9 ▼
– tuchodi -9 points 1 year ago +1 / -10

You'll find the science in the link you supplied: "Seropositivity for anti-N antibodies should not be interpreted as protection from future infection. Vaccination remains the safest strategy for preventing complications from SARS-CoV-2 infection, including hospitalization among children and adults (4,5). COVID-19 vaccination following infection provides additional protection against severe disease and hospitalization (6). Staying up to date††† with vaccination is recommended for all eligible persons, including those with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection."

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– CanadianRighty [S] 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Why isn't natural immunity or negative tests good enough for travel here, unlike other countries?

Science? Where’s the proof? Oh wait you have none, just your baseless claims.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -7 ▼
– tuchodi -7 points 1 year ago +1 / -8

Your own link references a science study that says vaccination is recommended, because "Seropositivity for anti-N antibodies should not be interpreted as protection from future infection." - meaning just surviving covid is not enough - and goes on to recommend getting vaccinated.

Why is that not good enough for you? It's not the opinion of some individual article writer. It's the result of the analysis of 5 recent months of data from 50 US states plus some territories, involving many tens of thousands of individual cases, by a team of trained scientists.

Why isn't natural immunity or negative tests good enough for travel here

Is that not science enough for you?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– CanadianRighty [S] 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Not enough, I want the science that shows the real world effectiveness of the infringements of constitutional rights.

Or you could just admit there is no evidence.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -7 ▼
– tuchodi -7 points 1 year ago +1 / -8

the real world effectiveness

Your own post links to a study that shows that vaccination is the best protection. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/mm7117e3.htm

Hospital records show that unvaccinated people are a greater burden on the healthcare system. Today's numbers from Ontario hospitals show 21% of the covid patients come from the 10% of the population that is not vaccinated.

Unvaccinated people should not be packed tightly into enclosed spaces breathing recirculated air with people who could be carrying the virus.

It's pretty simple.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– VaxedAndContagious1 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0

Tuchodi posts: ”vaccination is the best protection.” FALSE.

1. THE FULLY VACCINATED HAVE THE HIGHEST RATE OF COVID INFECTIONS

FACT

2. THE COVID VACCINE FAILED 85% OF HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS

3. Dr Zain Chagla, infectious diseases specialist confirms VACCINE STATUS IS IRRELEVANT IN THE ICU.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -6 ▼
– tuchodi -6 points 1 year ago +1 / -7

Nope. Overall the vaccines reduce the damage the virus does.

28 February 2022 "in the six-month period July to December 2021, the estimated relative risk of admission to Jersey General Hospital due to clinical COVID for those aged 40 and over was 3.5-14.4 times greater in those who had received less than two doses of COVID vaccine than in those who received two or more doses of the vaccine." https://www.gov.je/Health/Coronavirus/CoronavirusDocuments/R%20COVID%20Cases%20Vaccine%20Status%20Report.pdf

Nov. 25, 2021 "Unvaccinated people are about six times more likely to test positive than vaccinated people, nine times more likely to be hospitalized, and 14 times more likely to die from COVID-related complications" https://www.webmd.com/vaccines/covid-19-vaccine/news/20211124/unvaccinated-14-times-more-likely-to-die-from-covid

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -6 ▼
– tuchodi -6 points 1 year ago +1 / -7

No one can tell if that's true by reading your post, can they?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– VaxedAndContagious1 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

.

POSTING INACCURATE REPORTING AGAIN TUCHODI? Not very scientific don’t you think? Why keep posting ONTARIO DASHBOARD when you know it has a disclaimer warning that their reporting is incomplete and inaccurate. Why are you knowingly posting inaccurate reporting Tuchodi?

Dr Zain Chagla, infectious diseases specialist confirms VACCINE STATUS IS IRRELEVANT IN THE ICU.

A triple-vaccinated 70-year-old with diabetes, for instance, would still have a higher risk of severe illness and hospitalization than an unvaccinated 30-year-old. Of course, discriminating against the ability to travel based on age would be unethical.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -6 ▼
– tuchodi -6 points 1 year ago +1 / -7

you know it has a disclaimer warning that their reporting is incomplete and inaccurate.

I don't suppose you could back that claim up with a link, eh? Nothing personal, but I think we shouldn't be expected to just take your word.

Dr Zain Chagla, infectious diseases specialist...

Or that one?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– VaxedAndContagious1 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0

Why are you so angry Tuchodi when National Data proves that THE FULLY VACCINATED ARE AT HIGHER RISK OF COVID INFECTION?

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 7 ▼
– VaxedAndContagious1 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0

”The Ontario Dashboard stats aren't cooked, they're inaccurate”.

Your words.

You are a FRAUD

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

.win Network   |   Patriots   GavinMcinnes   ConsumeProduct   KotakuInAction   KotakuInAction2   WeekendGunnit   GreatAwakening   IP2Always   TuckerCarlson   Conspiracies

###Welcome to OMEGACANADA

Formerly known as r/metacanada, a reddit forum largely (but not exclusively) populated by conservatives, many of whom were arbitrarily banned from other forums for being conservatives.

###Get Social

  • OMEGACANADA YouTube
  • OMEGACANADA Twitter
  • OMEGACANADA Instagram
  • MetaCanada Discord
  • MetaCanada Twitter

###Other .WIN communities

  • Patriots.win
  • GavinMcInnes.win
  • ConsumeProduct.win
  • KotakuInAction.win
  • KotakuInAction2.win
  • WeekendGunnit.win

###Reddit links

  • NEW: r/MetaCanadaClassic
  • r/metacanada
  • r/canada
  • r/CanadaPolitics
  • r/OnGuardforThee

###Neckbeard Awards

  • The 2020 Neckbeard Awards
  • The 2019 Neckbeard Awards
  • The 2018 Neckbeard Awards
  • The 2017 Neckbeard Awards
  • The 2016 Neckbeard Awards
  • The 2015 Neckbeard Awards
  • The 2014 Neckbeard Awards
  • The 2013 Neckbeard Awards
  • The 2012 Neckbeard Awards

###Important Resources

  • Omegacanada logos/watermarks

###RULES

Site-wide (entire .win network) rules

OmegaCanada specific rules:

  • 1 No doxxing.
  • 2 No racism, antisemitism or identitarianism of any kind.
  • 3 No advocating or cheerleading for communism or nazism.
  • 4 No promotion of white nationalist parties such as the CNP, PPC etc.
  • 5 No condoning/threatening illegal activity.
  • 6 No inciting/condoning criminal violence, even against people who deserve it.
  • 7 Mark NSFW links NSFW
  • 6 No shitty bots
  • 7 No sketchy links
  • 8 No floodposting, especially for the purpose of meta-griefing.
  • 9 No abusing the report button.

Moderators

  • Ham_Sandwich77
  • LowShitSystem
  • LoneConservative
  • LinkBot
  • BarryMod
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2023.21.02 - zdr58 (status)

Copyright © 2023.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy