What gave you the impression he based his press briefing comment on an individual study or report.
The EMA is Europe’s CDC, this guy is the head of vaccine strategy.
He’s basically explaining the EMAs vision moving forward. He wants to transition into a variant specific dose before every winter once Covid is endemic. He thinks half of Europe will likely have contracted Omicron by March, and he believes in the dreaded natural immunity.
I’ll check it out thx
Shill dude won’t accept this because the head of the EMA isn’t one of his approved scientists
Boosters “can be done once, or maybe twice, but it’s not something that we can think should be repeated constantly,” Marco Cavaleri, the EMA head of biological health threats and vaccines strategy, said at a press briefing on Tuesday. “We need to think about how we can transition from the current pandemic setting to a more endemic setting.”
Let me guess, the head of the European Medicines Agency is an unhinged conspiracy theorist
There may be hope for you after all, you’re finally starting to get it.
You’re right, I shouldn’t be forced to purchase insurance if I have the means of personally covering my own liabilities.
The guy is still pretending they caught all of the infections prior to Omicron, still has no idea what the difference between IFR and CFR. He’s totally out of his league.
Ah so are you saying the system wasn’t overrun before covid?
Don’t worry I don’t expect and answer, I know you’re incapable of processing that question.
Which scientists should I ask BTW? Only the ones you promote I suppose
Translation, you’re not intelligent enough to think for yourself
You’re the one who needs to get your shit together bud, in case you haven’t heard the vaccines don’t prevent transmission, or are you still on the old narrative
incapable of answering simple question per usual
"maybe the facilities won't be overwhelmed."
You're going to need to provide some backup on that.
The system was overwhelmed before Covid
Finally the leftists have come full circle.
I agree, from now anyone who burdens the healthcare system due to a choice they made should face significant financial penalties, and not permitted to enjoy restaurants.
Overweight, smoker, snowboarder, motorcyclist etc etc.
I'm not any of those why have I been paying for their care?
You still don't know the difference between a case and an infection, after two years.
Explains why you can't seem to comprehend the difference between IFR and CFR.
Right, thanks
So there shouldn't be much difficulty in counting cases, since they're just counting positive tests.
I think the issue is counting infections, which they could never accurately do.
That's why IFR has always been so much lower than CFR.
According to Wikipedia my age category IFR is 0.068%. Risk for me would be vastly lower however since i don't have underlying conditions.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic
oOoOoOooohhhh soo scary.
Good thing the vaccines protect grandma from me. Oh wait..
Wow for a guy who thinks of himself as intelligent you sure have a tough time answering a simple question.
What is a Case?
Wait I'm confused, what is a case? Why the hell can they not accurately count cases?
Pretending natural immunity is a conspiracy theory makes so much sense
She got them from the Government of Ontario
There have been 19 deaths in children. They don't publish data on the number of those that were already on the verge of death.
This has been identified as a 0.002% risk, for most healthy kids the risk would of course be much much lower.
Now they're talking about vaccinating babies. And we have people defending this as moral.
A society that uses little innocent children as shields for geriatric adults is sick and perverse beyond words.
Oh mud on face, removing post for being shit
Common sense? Why would my dose increase by 3x when the clock strikes midnight on my 12th birthday? Science?
Ah the “anonymous so can’t be trusted” fallback position. You must find it baffling why whistleblowers are permitted to be anonymous, with claims taken seriously.
I thought you said you were paying attention so I assumed, you were aware of these commonly known facts. What were you saying about Hichen again?
Here we see no risk in children from Covid, and risk from vaccine. We see people with natural immunity have a strong response. Now why are we forcing the vaccine on these groups?
19 children died WITH covid, 2,000 people under 60 died WITH covid so far, and average age of death WITH covid virtually same as life expectancy.
https://health-infobase.canada.ca/covid-19/epidemiological-summary-covid-19-cases.html UK vaccine advisory board Scientists not backing Covid jabs for healthy 12 to 15-year-olds due to myocarditis risk, and lack of covid risk.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/health-58438669.amp
Canada has 1.95 acute care hospital beds per 1,000 people, fewer than any other OECD country but Mexico.
Pfizers own data released by order of court in US showing thousands of serious tens of thousands of “serious” AE’s including over 1,200 deaths.
https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf CDC indicating strong natural immunity- “The immunity provided by vaccine and prior infection are both high but not complete (i.e., not 100%).” https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/science/science-briefs/vaccine-induced-immunity.html
Mechanism behind clotting in AZ
WHO indicates vaccine reduce spread by only 40%, not sure why people who’ve been vaccinated would be immune from testing, or the logic in vaccine passports given the ineffectiveness in preventing ongoing transmission.
https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20211124-vaccines-reduce-covid-transmission-by-40-who
In Canada our NACI recommends a 10 microgram dose in 5-11 cohort and 30 microgram dose in 12-18 cohort. So a 120lb 11 year old would get 1/3 of the dose of a 80lb 12 year old. TrUsT tHe sCiEnCe.
NPC- "safe & effective, safe & effective, safe & effective, safe & effective, safe & effective, safe & effective, safe & effective, safe & effective, safe & effective, safe & effective"
Critical thinker- "But we have some new data, and"
NPC- "safe & effective, safe & effective, safe & effective, safe & effective, safe & effective, safe & effective, safe & effective, safe & effective, safe & effective, safe & effective"
Critical thinker- "No just let me speak, the vaccine starts to wear off at"
NPC- "Anti-Vaxxer! safe & effective, safe & effective, safe & effective, safe & effective"
Critical thinker- "I know but I think for the following reasons it should be a personal ch"
NPC- "NONONO trust me, trust the science, its safe and effective, safe and effective.."
Critical thinker- "But you just keep saying the same thing over and over again without acknowledging things that challenge your"
NPC- "safe & effective, safe & effective, safe & effective, safe & effective, safe & effective, safe & effective, safe & effective, safe & effective, safe & effective, safe & effective"
I agree, I think it’s about the great reset, and they expected the vaccines to be mostly harmless.
It would be a lot easier for them to jam this down everyone’s throats if it had the risk profile of traditional vaccines.
But who fucking knows, I wouldn’t be surprised if I was wrong and they do intend on depopulation. These people have proven themselves to be evil twisted fucks.