What happened in Wuhan September 12, 2019
On the September 12, 2019, the virus database at the Wuhan Institute of Virology was taken offline, and with it 22,000 coronavirus samples were gone.
That same day security was beefed up at the facility and a tender was issued to replace the air-conditioning system. There was later a communications blackout, with no cell-phone or signals activity.
The institute also went on a spending spree, purchasing an air medical waste incinerator and PCR equipment to test for coronaviruses.
One of those three researchers working at the Wuhan Institute of Virology was Huang Yanling, who disappeared from the institute's website in early 2020. Her social media presence also vanished. She has not been seen since.
Nice.
OP, check out Tom McDonalds “Sheeple”
Science and experts have been politicized, it's easy to see
A mask became a symbol of which side you believe
But you'll never cure a sickness till you cure all the greed
Because the problem with our natural immunity is that it’s free
And the conspiracy theories labeled as misinformation
It's just the terrifying truth that scares the hell out the nation
George Orwell, 1984 was his last lecture
George called 'em thought police, now we call 'em fact-checkers
They don't teach you rights in schol, you never learned 'em at all
'Cause they're easy to remove if you don't know what they are
The only people you can rule are the criminal ones
So they force you into corners till you're breaking the law”.
All sudden deaths have a single common denominator, the mRNA vaccine. Excess mortality and declining birth rates have been present and constant since 2021, in countries vaccinated at 80% and more.
Remember before mass vaccination in 2020? When an asymptomatic cold that without a test you wouldn't even know you had it. When kids and young adults never heard of myocarditis?
Selfish ignorance. From personal experience, the worst Covid Authoritarians are the old, the obese and those in poor (mental) health.
They are confortable sacrificing the lives of the young who are not at risk at all. Same Covid Authoritarians who hate hearing the truth, that the survival rate is +99.7%.
These triple vaccinated Covid authoritarians also blame the healthy unvaccinated when they get sick with severe Covid infections after each booster
The fact that vaccine mandates were implemented despite controversy among experts and without updating the sole publicly available risk-benefit analysis to the current Omicron variants nor submitting the methods to public scrutiny suggests a profound lack of transparency in scientific and regulatory policy making.
Sums it up.
The ones who refuse accountability for their own bad health, such as the obese and the terrified elderly at high risk of any disease are forcing a medical experiment on the youngest population that are at the lowest at risk and have the most to lose. (A lifetime of heart disease, sterility issues, clots and lifetime on blood thinners at 18 yo)
A Government official being paid with our tax dollars, it’s got the Canadian logo at the end; this is official Government propaganda, supported by Pfizer and Moderna who are engaged in secret drug contracts with the Government. These two corporations are very well aware that they cannot advertise their drugs to children, so instead they have public health officials doing it for them. This is absolutely disgusting, reprehensible, it’s morally repugnant.
Kyle is spot on
You are correct
Pre mRNA mass vaccination, in 2020, kids were asymptomatic and or mild to no symptoms.
https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/discussion/kids-and-covid-19-why-they-are-not-getting-as-sick/
Post mass vaccination, 2021, 2022, record hospitalization rates for kids cold and flu with severe infections
“I just finished reading the entire study; it is junk science manipulating unreliable data:
- Vaccination status used in the study came from the COVaxON database, which followed Government definitions. This means a person was considered “unvaxed” for the first 14 days after a shot (any shot).
As the study period was only for 1 month, even a month that was preceded by a record number of injections, it is safe to conclude that a significant portion of the "unvaxed" were in fact vaccinated. If only 602 of the 6,682 casualties involved were within 14 days of their Covid vaccine, the difference in incidences of vaxxed vs “unvaxed” crashes vanishes.
See:
https://covid19tracker.ca/provincevac.html?p=ON.
https://www.ontario.ca/page/proof-covid-19-vaccination
-
Based on Table 3 in the study, less than half of the injured were drivers. (LOL!!) By the logic of the authors, an unvaxxed passenger is more likely to cause an accident than a vaxxed passenger. This is ludicrous and positively demonstrates the data is unreliable (see point 1 above).
-
By section S7 of the Appendix, all deaths that occurred at the scene of the accident were excluded. The authors estimate at least 42 deaths were excluded. Since only 8 deaths were included, that means they excluded 84% of the most serious crash outcome. Also, since the study involved only 550 people that were actually admitted to a hospital, excluding 42 deaths was a major oversight, again demonstrating the data is unreliable.
-
By excluding all deaths that occurred at the scene of the accident, they conveniently excluded all accidents resulting from a vaccine induced sudden death.
-
The source data is not available, so none of their work can be verified.
-
They admit that a weakness of their study is that they did not account for miles driven. They go on to claim that "a 100% increase in driving distance, however, is unlikely to explain the magnitude of traffic risks observed in this study." But here they are incorrect, for a doubling of the distance driven should double the risk of a crash, all things being equal. And even their study did not find the unvaxxed twice as likely to be involved in an accident.
-
While they blatantly say that those that resisted the covid shot were misinformed, they do have the honesty to admit that "the study does not test the reliability of COVID vaccination as a proxy for COVID vaccine hesitancy." In other words, the authors didn't bother to verify that many people refused the covid-death-shot, not because they were misinformed but because they saw that the so called vaccine was unreliable. By admitting that they didn't test for this critical factor they overthrow the whole basis of their paper: vaccine hesitancy is associated with reckless driving habits.
-
They testify: "We verify that traffic crashes disproportionately involve those in poverty." But since poverty does not make people more reckless behind the wheel, this statement proves there are other factors involved (such as: older cars of inferior quality, driving further to work, driving to work even when the weather is bad, driving during rush hour, etc.). Thus, the whole premise of their study is unhinged.
-
This unreliable study expressly says what I suspected in an earlier post, for they say: "COVID vaccine status might be considered for regions that prioritize road safety, such as those that mandate physicians to warn risky drivers and report to vehicle licensing agencies." And, "The observed risks might also justify changes to driver insurance policies in the future." Such a conclusion is utterly reprehensible, since they themselves admit they have not prove causality between so called vaccine hesitancy and car crashes, and more so because they know the extra insurance costs will fall on the poorest people.
Disturbing video. Blood clot from her knee to her hip. On blood thinners for life. Heart rate problems. Uterus hemorrhage from blood thinners, back in the hospital, uterus surgery. Infections followed, more intensive care hospitalization.
This lady was on zero meds before vax, now on 6 meds per day afters clots, 200$ out of pocket per month since the covid shots.
Covid shots put her in and out of intensive care, operating room, physical rehabilitation, has to wear casts, disabled, lost her business due to not being able to stand and reduced mobility.
Her 18 year old son, sent to ER and intensive care hospitalizations for embolism in both lungs right after covid shots. He is on blood thinners for life.
Not one doctor has the courage to report both their covid shot side effects.
When she mailed her legislators to tell them she and her son almost died from covid shot clots. Ignored. No answer.
When she posted that she got clots from the shots, her vax side effect were deleted from the government Facebook pages and the government blocked her.
It’s stories like these that confirm: the Vaccine hospitalizations data is suppressed. Don’t trust your doctor and never trust the Government.
Like she says in the video: “I asked my doctor to report my case, this was during the time doctors were losing their licenses for mentioning Covid Vaccine side effects. My doctor refused to report”.
This financial institution also needed to know who you preferred having sex with before hiring you