4
Mtlheavy 4 points ago +4 / -0

This reminds me of an Air Canada flight I was on Wed night from São Paulo to Toronto. The head flight attendant makes his pre-departure announcements. The announcements warn of the seriousness of Covid19 and how Air Canada is committed to the passengers’ safety.

He continues: “wearing a mask is obligatory at all times on the plane. When eating and drinking the mask must continue to be worn, and it may be removed to allow food or drink to be consumed so long as it is replaced after eat bite or sip”.

I thinking to myself, this is completely retarded. (Btw I am in business class with 7 of 30 seats occupied and no one near to me. Anyway....)

But wait, it gets much better.

Th announcement continues: “however, during the formal dinner or breakfast meal service masks may be removed for the duration of the meal.”

So, masks must be worn while eating or drinking, and removed only to allow food or drink to be inserted into your mouth. But, if it’s during formal meal service this rule doesn’t apply. Either masks are important or they are not. Why have such silly rules? If I eat the crappy meal I can take my mask off. But if I snack on a bag of chips or chocolate bar I may only remove the masks for bites. I was and still am shaking my head as to how ridiculous this whole thing has become.

16
Mtlheavy 16 points ago +16 / -0

She’s an idiot. This is just more fear mongering. There may be some violence from the leftist mobs but if Trump wins they will soon realize their free reign of lawless behaviour is coming to an end. And in any event, any violence will largely be confined to a handful of cities and be very localised in those cities.

7
Mtlheavy 7 points ago +7 / -0

In Liberals’ thinking this is a win. And in the thinking of all Liberal voters.

4
Mtlheavy 4 points ago +4 / -0

I’m going to be heading down to Brazil for Christmas at the beach. Warm weather and not bombarded by the world is going to end news 24/7.

5
Mtlheavy 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is real? Why don’t they also cover the end of the instruments where the air flows out? Otherwise what’s the point? So ridiculous!!

2
Mtlheavy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Leftists were probably quietly hoping the victims would be Muslim or some other victim class so they could then blame this on alt-right quebecers.

11
Mtlheavy 11 points ago +11 / -0

The other related thing is that many immigrants from developing countries come from places where there is little if any freedom. These immigrants will support restrictions on our freedoms because that is perfectly normal to them. And their numbers increase every year.

3
Mtlheavy 3 points ago +3 / -0

There are lots of things people may say that they probably shouldn’t, including statements that may arbitrarily and needlessly hurt someone. That doesn’t mean such statements should be illegal.

If any limits are to be placed on speech they much be very limited and clear in scope, not capable of arbitrary enforcement and applied to everyone equally.

It’s the difference between what is permissive and restricted, what people may do compared to what’s illegal.

4
Mtlheavy 4 points ago +4 / -0

No. But here is a difference between what people should not do and what people are legally allowed to do.

4
Mtlheavy 4 points ago +4 / -0

True. Funny thing is it’s the white liberals that will attack white privilege. The immigrants want to come to Canada precisely because it is a white, western country.

6
Mtlheavy 6 points ago +6 / -0

First of all, soon the definition of visible minority will change because of immigration.

More importantly, it’s not a question of minority immigrants. It’s a question of attitude. Canada should welcome immigrants who are willing to work and contribute to Canada. And perhaps they should be given a probation period - two or three years to demonstrate self sufficiency after which they can stay. If they can’t demonstrate that they must leave.

2
Mtlheavy 2 points ago +2 / -0

With age comes wisdom. He can see thru the Dem bullshit.

3
Mtlheavy 3 points ago +3 / -0

Canada is too ‘woke’.

2
Mtlheavy 2 points ago +2 / -0

If the focus was on bringing in solely higher qualification immigrants as opposed to say, laborers, wouldn’t the input value increase more and result in increasing per capita output and an increase in per capita income and overall living standards?

14
Mtlheavy 14 points ago +14 / -0

Vigano is a very brave man. I wonder how he interacts with the Pope. I hope he has a food tester and bullet proof vest and lots of body guards. I’ve read his earlier writings. He is completely spot on. I guess that makes me a conspiracy theorist. Well, too bad for me then, I guess. I’m am sourcing a place to relocate to out of reach of most of these globalists.

2
Mtlheavy 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree. I’m just a pointing out possible reasons for the increase. I don’t think it was a conscious policy to allow more illegals. The proof will be in what happens if he is re-elected.

7
Mtlheavy 7 points ago +7 / -0

That’s likely because the economy is booming and many more people want to come to the US. Plus, ICE and DHS have to be extra mindful how they police because of the increased publicity of their actions. It is certainly not the result of Trump’s policies.

8
Mtlheavy 8 points ago +8 / -0

Actually, the worst-case scenario is a Biden victory.

20
Mtlheavy 20 points ago +20 / -0

Actually they do. Many Muslims have come to their defense justifying the murders on the basis that cartoons of Mohamed were published, including the former prime minister of Malaysia, a member of the Commonwealth.

4
Mtlheavy 4 points ago +4 / -0

Mahatir, the former PM of Malaysia, forgets to mention that ethnic Chinese, Indians and Christians are treated as second class citizens in Malaysia. And the Malaysian leaders are about as dumb and corrupt as can be. They confiscated bibles which used the word Allah for God. Allah is the Arabic word for God and had been used by Christians for hundreds of years before Mohamed. The Malaysian leaders thought their Muslim people might be fooled into converting to Christianity if the Bibles used the word Allah. Malaysian leaders objected to the use of the words Hot Dogs because dogs are unclean in Islam. Malaysian leaders have objected to various cartoons of pigs for similar reasons. Malaysian Airlines was required to remove its inflight magazine because it contained a review of a Kuala Lumpur restaurant that served pork. There are dozens of other silly examples. Anyway, it should come as no surprise he and the Malay people are intolerant. Of course they assert rights they deny to others. Hypocrites.

6
Mtlheavy 6 points ago +6 / -0

I’m so tired of such empty slogans. “No one is protected until everyone is protected”. This is empty, meaningless blather.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›