All those people who are vaccinated and think they're invincible now are to blame. What right do they have to risk the life of people who choose not to be vaccinated? They should all be staying home and wearing three masks until the pandemic ends sometime in the 2040s.
They openly state that they're doing it:
Hamilton’s COVID-19 vaccination program prioritizes Black and other racialized populations/people of colour ages 18+ in priority neighbourhoods https://www.hamilton.ca/government-information/news-centre/news-releases/hamiltons-covid-19-vaccination-program-prioritizes
That would probably be because early on they had tougher border controls and travel restrictions, unlike Canada. Also unlike Canada, much more ethnically homogeneous and the bordering countries are like minded in their methods for dealing with a relatively non-lethal virus. https://www.wsj.com/articles/finland-and-norway-avoid-covid-19-lockdowns-but-keep-the-virus-at-bay-11605704407
Norway's population is also only a few million with few large urban areas, and even these aren't exactly anthills and people can function in an orderly manner and survive by not flocking to mega stores in a panic.
unvaccinated people could have natural immunity by now. Moreover since the most vulnerable chose or were forced to get the vaccine, according to pro-vaccine theory, there should be virtually no risk of serious illness and death now.
Tell me his "arson" attacks weren't political, hence terrorism.... https://www.facebook.com/augustcaprian
Something worse will happen to come along in a few years and covid will be long forgotten. Whether you believe in covid or not, one thing is for certain the government has learned lessons on how Canadians can be controlled and manipulated.
May have had underlying health issues that they won't report. The obvious is that he most likely was vitamin D deficient (as most blacks are) and he was obese. Otherwise someone his age is extremely low risk. He made his choice and for whatever reason it didn't work out for him. The media exploiting this is reprehensible. If they feel they have the right to do this to scare people into compliance, why not do the same with drug addicts and HIV/AIDs?
Dundas wasn't a "counter-abolitonist" though. He believed that slavery should be ended, but that if it was abolished immediately the sudden adjustment would have a detrimental effect on the freed slaves.
"It is impossible to emancipate the present Slaves at once ; nor would their immediate emancipation, be of any immediate benefit to themselves ; but this observation does not apply to any of their descendants, if trained, and educated in the manner I have suggested." https://archive.org/details/debateonamotion01commgoog/page/n88/mode/2up?q=Dundas
No, but it's a fair indication of what some demographics are thinking.