3
RightOfSask 3 points ago +3 / -0

Depends on how many Wilson-Raybould voters protest-vote against the Liberals.

Hastings-Lennox, which is Sloan's riding, seems to be a safer pickup for the Liberals, if Sloan runs. He will split the vote in that riding.

https://338canada.com/35039e.htm

1
RightOfSask 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fake and gay.

In the 1920s and 1930s the people wouldn't have been so politically correct to write "The People Who Own The Banks". They would have just called out Jews.

And I'm pretty sure that there was no vaccination campaign against the Spanish Flu. Only some limited trials which all failed.

1
RightOfSask 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMHzj5aquzk

They started filming in the parking lot of the Lytton AG Market. Then they start driving north with the clouds of smoke coming in from the south and some fire to the east of the town (not on the west end like the church). A few seconds later they are passing the local Soctiabank branch.

https://i.imgur.com/9jwX13s.png

You would have to explain how the fire circled the whole city, which is more than improbable.

1
RightOfSask 1 point ago +2 / -1

The source of the fire had to be somewhere south of the town. There are already thick clouds of smoke blowing north. And fire spreads mainly in the direction of the wind.

1
RightOfSask 1 point ago +2 / -1

I just looked at one of these videos of residents who were fleeing from the fire.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMHzj5aquzk

They started filming in the parking lot of the Lytton AG Market. Then they start driving north with the clouds of smoke coming in from the south and some fire to the east of the town (not on the west end like the church). A few seconds later they are passing the local Soctiabank branch.

https://i.imgur.com/9jwX13s.png

It's not impossible that the fire started near the church, but the fire would have to circle the city to get to the other side of it, which is kinda if improbable (especially with the wind blowing north).

1
RightOfSask 1 point ago +1 / -0

True.

But there are also railroad tracks on the other side of the town. Depends where it started.

8
RightOfSask 8 points ago +8 / -0

I hope canadians rally and kick this mofo out of office

If O'Toole doesn't change something drastically, it won't happen.

2
RightOfSask 2 points ago +2 / -0

The death rate for COVID is 1.8 in 100,000

Is that for the whole population? Because if you just look at the US with 33.7 million cases and 605,000 deaths this would relate to 1795 deaths per 100,000 Covid cases.

In Canada we had 1.4 million confirmed cases and 26,339 deaths, which relates to 1881 deaths per 100,000 Covid cases.

1
RightOfSask 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://www.indexmundi.com/g/g.aspx?c=ca&v=26

They use the CIA Factbook from 2020 as source, speak their 2020 numbers are projections and not real data.

https://www.google.ca/amp/knoema.com/atlas/Canada/Death-rate%3fmode=amp

https://imgur.com/8hPxIRg.png

Even worse. They use almost 3 year old data, unless you think they know somehow the "historical" death rate of Canada in 2020 from a data set which was released in 2019.

1
RightOfSask 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, you're just wrong. Here is an archive from November 2020.

https://archive.is/wxK9S

Look, they have the same projected death rate for 2020 as currently. The 2020 death rate you see on their website is a projected one. It's not historical data. Learn to read.

1
RightOfSask 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's not. You pulled that our of your ass.

All 2020 data is not historical data.

https://i.imgur.com/PdXg0wm.png

Unless you provide proof of the opposite, you're still wrong.

1
RightOfSask 1 point ago +1 / -0

Funny how the historical section already has the 2021 death rate, even when the year isn't over.

Neither their 2020 or their 2021 numbers are historical, as mentioned by their disclaimer on their website.

1
RightOfSask 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're not playing. You're losing.

Macrotrends states on their website that the 2020 numbers are not historical. Their 2020 numbers are UN projections before even Covid became a thing.

1
RightOfSask 1 point ago +1 / -0

However, Macrotrends is updated, to date, with Historical Data.

No, it's not. You have to be blind to not see that on their website

NOTE: All 2020 and later data are UN projections and DO NOT include any impacts of the COVID-19 virus.

None of their 2020 numbers are real numbers. All projections from 2019 without any Covid impact.

1
RightOfSask 1 point ago +1 / -0

Historical data is updated as per updated timeframes.

They don't even use the right timeframes. Their 2020 deaths go from July 2019 to June 2020. Half of the year is missing while half of 2019 is included.

Some countries like Canada fared better and some countries like the US did worse.

1
RightOfSask 1 point ago +1 / -0

The stats you referenced appear to refer to changes in projected numbers.

They don't. Your links like the statista links are projected numbers. These are not official ones.

And we're not alone with a higher death rate than expected. In the US the number of deaths increased by over 16% between 2019 and 2020. From 2.8 million to over 3.3 million.

https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7014e1.htm

1
RightOfSask 1 point ago +1 / -0

PLEASE view the Total Death rate of Canada over the last 20 years and that of 2020 and you will note NO SIGNIFICANT change to the TOTAL.

https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/210607/dq210607a-eng.htm

"In the first months of the pandemic, from March to June 2020, 8,423 more lives were lost than expected."

"In the fall, the number of excess deaths and deaths attributable to COVID-19 started to rise again. From the end of September 2020 to the beginning of February 2021, there were 9,117, or 7.9%, more deaths than expected."

"After significant excess mortality had been observed since September 2020, the number of excess deaths in Canada started to decline through January and February. Almost 12 months after the start of the pandemic, from March 2020 to early March 2021, there were an estimated 18,511 excess deaths in Canada, or 6.7% more deaths than expected, after accounting for changes in the population, such as aging."

9
RightOfSask 9 points ago +9 / -0

It wasn't revoked. It just runs out automatically and then is renewed. It is still in place.

https://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/r21486

3
RightOfSask 3 points ago +3 / -0

There are other Christian groups who get and got funding. This group was anti-abortion and anti-same sex marriage, which goes against the charter (according to the Libs). Therefore they were denied funding.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›