"Death toll" numbers are fake. Useless contribution op.
They should both be fined, Alex Jones style.
Always the eyes.
$Cience and Science are not the same. Science is to be questioned and results repeatable, transparent and driven by truth not censored and results manipulated. $Cience is paid for propaganda.
That's what all doctors should do unless they are familiar with the individual patient and are aware of their medical history. That is a responsible statement. The promoters of an experimental gene therapy who have vested interest in selling a product will be held accountable.
"This week, my colleague and friend Sally Fallon Morell brought to my attention an amazing article put out by the CDC. The link to the article is here, and it was published in June 2020. The purpose of the article was for a group of about 20 virologists to describe the state of the science of the isolation, purification and biological characteristics of the new SARS-CoV-2 virus, and to share this information with other scientists for their own research. A thorough and careful reading of this important paper reveals some shocking findings.
First, in the section titled “Whole Genome Sequencing,” we find that rather than having isolated the virus and sequencing the genome from end to end, that the CDC “designed 37 pairs of nested PCRs spanning the genome on the basis of the coronavirus reference sequence (GenBank accession no. NC045512).”
To me, this computer-generation step constitutes scientific fraud. Here is an equivalency: A group of researchers claim to have found a unicorn because they found a piece of a hoof, a hair from a tail, and a snippet of a horn. They then add that information into a computer and program it to re-create the unicorn, and they then claim this computer re-creation is the real unicorn. Of course, they had never actually seen a unicorn so could not possibly have examined its genetic makeup to compare their samples with the actual unicorn’s hair, hooves and horn.
The researchers claim they decided which is the real genome of SARS-CoV-2 by “consensus,” sort of like a vote. Again, different computer programs will come up with different versions of the imaginary “unicorn,” so they come together as a group and decide which is the real imaginary unicorn."
"Follow the $Cience." "The $Cience evolved". "Trust the experts" they said. Disregard the long accepted "scientific method".
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/10/14/the-virus-that-doesnt-exist-lies-and-consequences/
From linked:
"Buried deep in the document, in a section titled, “Performance Characteristics,” we have this: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV [SARS-CoV-2] are currently available, assays [diagnostic tests] designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA…” (document page 40, pdf page 41)
The key phrase there is: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV [virus] are currently available…”
Every object that exists can be quantified, which is to say, measured. The use of the term “quantified” in that phrase means: the CDC has no virus, because it is unavailable. THE CDC HAS NO VIRUS.
One of the two most powerful public health agencies in the world can’t obtain the virus from anywhere. Why? Obviously, because no one has it.
A further tip-off is the use of the word ‘isolates.” This means NO ISOLATED VIRUS IS AVAILABLE.
Another way to put it: NO ONE HAS AN ISOLATED SPECIMEN OF THE COVID-19 VIRUS.
NO ONE HAS ISOLATED THE COVID-19 VIRUS.
THEREFORE, NO ONE HAS PROVED THAT IT EXISTS.
As if this were not a revelation to shock the world, the CDC goes on to say they are presenting a diagnostic PCR test, in that very paper I’m citing, to detect the virus-that-hasn’t-been-isolated…and the test is looking for RNA which is PRESUMED to come from the virus that hasn’t been proved to exist.
And using this test, the CDC and every other public health agency in the world would go on to count COVID cases and deaths…and governments instituted lockdowns and economic devastation using those case and death numbers as justification.
The pandemic is a fraud, down to the root of the poisonous tree"
"It was withdrawn because it could only detect covid and nothing else"?
https://www.cdc.gov/locs/2021/07-21-2021-lab-alert-Changes_CDC_RT-PCR_SARS-CoV-2_Testing_1.html
"In preparation for this change, CDC recommends clinical laboratories and testing sites that have been using the CDC 2019-nCoV RT-PCR assay select and begin their transition to another FDA-authorized COVID-19 test. CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses. Such assays can facilitate continued testing for both influenza and SARS-CoV-2 and can save both time and resources as we head into influenza season."
Who should I believe? Who should I trust? Not you, or the cdc. Both of you are full of shit.
" If your sample came back negative and you wanted to know more you had to run more tests."
Run more tests to compare to what exactly?
Remember when the pcr test was to be withdrawn on Dec 31st 2021 because it couldn't distinguish between covid and any other form of flu? Remember when Kerry mullis, inventor of the pcr said this is not what the pcr is designed for? What percent of people who claim to have "long covid" volunteered to take the jab?
Trust the Scientific Method.
What is your definition of unvaccinated?
Another useless contribution op.