2
ThePopCan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Gotta love Rex. I know less than 3% of Canadians now watch the CBC, but I imagine it spiked any time he was on the National.

1
ThePopCan 1 point ago +1 / -0

In the first case (i.e. engaging ecoterrorists / environmentalists), the answer would be more regulation of industry, diminished mobility rights, and higher taxes. The statists support the cause, so there'd be no clampdown.

In the second case (i.e. Indian activism), the answer would be wealth redistribution, land appropriations, virtue signaling, and likely extortion of institutions like the Catholic Church. The statists support the means and the ends, and are indifferent to the efficacy of any involved efforts, so there'd be no clampdown.

In the third case, socialists--even the Babeufian variety--inevitably support maximal government by the minimally talented contra minimal government by the maximally talented. Ergo, the statists (note: Mises regarded statism as a form of socialism) would find common cause and see no need to clampdown.

3
ThePopCan 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lol, assembling to freely protest their fellow citizens' Charter-protected freedom of assembly and speech. Canada would be a futuristic powerhouse if it ejected Montreal, Toronto, and Vancouver into the sun.

3
ThePopCan 3 points ago +3 / -0

Big time. I got banned from r/worldnews for posting Terence Corcoran's article about Schwab's linkage to the LPC. They're a bunch of leftists. Remember: leftists may sometimes seem antigovernmental, but they're always for big government; they just think that it should reflect their twisted ideology, or better, be made up of their tribe.

1
ThePopCan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nice whataboutism.

The Canadian government has loaned over $500M to the Zelensky regime. They also gave tens of millions of dollars in weapons to them. The Azov Battalion is openly neo-nazi, and an official part of the Ukrainian national guard. My question is: did the Trudeau regime specify that neonazis cannot claim millions of taxpayer dolars? If not, then why?

Big difference between an individual donating to the cause of protesting medical tyranny and the government donating individuals' money to the cause of nazism.

1
ThePopCan 1 point ago +1 / -0

A Pierre is a Pierre. What kind of a Pierre? It's a Pierre. A Pierre is a Pierre. And when you have a good Pierre, it's because it's Poilievre.

1
ThePopCan 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wouldn't call it anarcho-tyranny, though I understand your meaning.

I would say it's a leftist technocracy (with elements of 'state socialism', as understood by Mises; p.240+ : https://cdn.mises.org/Socialism%20An%20Economic%20and%20Sociological%20Analysis_3.pdf) with a curious anti-populist, Wilsonian reflex. Stephen Soukup's 'The Dictatorship of Woke Capital' explains the business side of the coin; Stephen Hicks' 'Explaining Modernism', Victor Davis Hanson's 'The Dying Citizen', George Will's 'The Conservative Sensibility', Hayek's 'The Road to Serfdom', and Kuehnelt-Leddihn's 'Leftism' explain the other side.

7
ThePopCan 7 points ago +7 / -0

"claims"

no proof; no charges. nice try.

You know what there is proof of? A pro-mandate Antifa terrorist charged for running over peaceful protesters who were demonstrating with permit in Winnipeg.

https://thepostmillennial.com/suspect-charged-in-winnipeg-attack-on-convoy-protest-revealed-to-be-antifa-radical

6
ThePopCan 6 points ago +6 / -0

35 MPs signed onto caucus review. O'toole's out. Dr. Leslyn Lewis or Pierre have to step up. If either do, they have to lean in hard on restoration of Charter rights.

If MacKay or some Laurentian elite are the pick, the party is toast.

7
ThePopCan 7 points ago +7 / -0

Peckford is the architect, the JCCF is the legal team representing him.

2
ThePopCan 2 points ago +3 / -1

"Russian army so close"

You realize that Ukraine sold the Russians a multi-decade lease and invited their navy and military in years and years ago, such that when the Russians took Crimea, they did so with troops already in the country ...?

As far as I'm concerned, this is civil strife and not worth wasting one jot of Canadian blood over. If, like in the Spanish Civil War, Canadians with vested interests want to go fight, by all means. (We had Canadians go fight on both sides of that conflict). Canada as a nation, notwithstanding its inane pledges and treaties with the failed Ukrainian state, shouldn't be provoking Russia.

Yes, Russia is a thuggish state. George Will rightly or wrongly called it a nationalist socialist nation minus the identitarianism of Germany's version. It's not great. But what we're managing to do, or rather what we've managed to do, with our bumble-fuck geopolitics, is push Russia into the arms of Iran and Communist China, at a time when the battle lines for the Sino-American War are being drawn.

The CCP fucked over the CCCP and helped the West undermine the Soviet Union. Putin, who has a historical awareness, knows the Chinese can't be trusted. And yet, owing to years of Russophobic hysteria and this effort to put NATO missile systems on Russia's eastern flank (on it's very border), we're making sure that the FSB Old Guard makes a concrete handshake with the Xiist new guard.

1
ThePopCan 1 point ago +1 / -0

100%. Interesting talk on it: https://youtu.be/JrMiSQAGOS4

4
ThePopCan 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah, but sound is where the similarity ends. GPrime is red-pilled AF and has a strong conservative-populist bent.

2
ThePopCan 2 points ago +2 / -0

As devious and underhanded as it is, I'd actually respect the effort if that's the case. However, if true, it will come out, and when it does, heads will fall.

1
ThePopCan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fair point. Celebrate a change in tack, but recognize that any change whatsoever is monumental and difficult, especially for those who are deeply entrenched.

2
ThePopCan 2 points ago +2 / -0

For abortions in Africa, gender studies in Latin America, for offsetting Chinese Communist coal emissions, and for Trudeau to take selfies with flood-plainers.

9
ThePopCan 9 points ago +9 / -0

It's confirmed black nationalist; BLM-supporting; Joy-Ann Reid / MSNBC-incited.

Here's a look at his social media: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1462633167890751497.html

3
ThePopCan 3 points ago +4 / -1

In fairness to Kyle, without training, he only shot the pedophile, the leftist 'revolutionary' and the failed executioner trying to murder him, and in the case of the 2nd, he merely disarmed him.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›