So nothing notable in other words. And I’m sure if hoards of seething leftists put your life under a microscope they’d find nothing to criticize either.
What a disingenuous crock of shit, Elon Musk literally changed the world and made the most significant contributions to space exploration in decades. What have you done lately?
You relentlessly spew reddit-grade commie agitprop and fill this right wing forum with pages and pages of TDS, pro-abortion tripe, and shilling for fake vaccines… and yet you complain about others spamming the hot page burying relevant stuff? The only way it could be more obvious that you are a paid agitator is if you came out and said so yourself, but as always with leftists I reserve the possibility that you are simply crazy.
tariffs will be a disaster. he's got you thinking china's going to foot the bill?
I hope they don't. That relationship benefits China way more than it benefits the US (or any country).
And the stock and crypto markets are benefiting normal people how exactly?
Normal people can't have any stock or crypto? Or benefit from economic optimism? This is the impoverished view leftists have of "normal people" because this is exactly where they want them.
Keep dooming. Maybe this time it'll be you who's so wrong you rage quit (or if you're paid to post, get fired).
The economic boom you're about to credit to Trump
Even deranged leftists know it's coming and are trying to cope with him being good for the economy in advance. Imagine having to cope about a win-win. You realize the stock and crypto markets surged the minute Trump got elected, right?
If I had a nickel for every unhinged leftist trolling this mostly abandoned conservative ghost town, I'd have two nickels. Which isn't a lot but it's weird that it happened twice.
To put the numbers in perspective, I made some rough calculations using the number of live births in Texas in 2022 (around 400,000) and an upper estimate of a 0.04% maternal mortality rate (40 per 100,000). What we're left with is approximately 160 maternal deaths in Texas for the year. Round it up to 200 and that's what your entire argument is predicated on; a tenuous link between those 200 deaths (and let's say the 71 that could be considered excess deaths according to the 56% increase claim) and a ban against abortion.
Unfortunately for you, your argument ignores positive outcomes which aren't captured by changes in maternal death statistics, uses stats from a systemically volatile time period in health care, completely disregards the lives of the unborn (a sentiment we're sadly used to seeing on your side, as appalling as it is), assumed a trend where there may be none, and ultimately falls to shambles along with your hysterical claim that "women will die in droves [because of Trump]" even though we've established that his election has no bearing on any of this whatsoever.
you don't want to debate about abortion because you know you're in the wrong about everything.
Presumptuous. Outstanding of you to not only believe I'm "in the wrong about everything", but actually think I share your belief.... Which I suppose I'd be wrong about too?
“There’s only one explanation for this staggering difference in maternal mortality,” said Nancy L. Cohen
Shallow and arrogant take.
From 2019 to 2022, the rate of maternal mortality cases in Texas rose by 56%, compared with just 11% nationwide during the same time period
2019 to 2022 you say? Yeah, there couldn't possibly be other confounding variables in there, like, say, malicious agenda-driven medical malpractice that deprived unvaccinated from health care to help sell the lie. Actually I don't know if they did that in Texas but it sure was how things went down in my home province of BC.
But anyhow, it's not material to my argument, since it ignores the fact that even if it's true that the percentage of maternal deaths increase (which is truly a sad thing and I don't want this to be misinterpreted as lacking in compassion for these women), for every woman saved from an untimely death by your method (mass acceptance, enablement, and dare I say celebration of abortion) there must be untold numbers of unborn babies murdered in the womb. Have you considered the possibility that these discrepancies in healthcare outcomes could be addressed in ways other than the mass slaughter of the unborn? Or that health outcomes are improved for those who didn't get an abortion but would have were a ban not in effect? Or that in the long term, with such a ban in effect, people will adapt and change their behaviour, and that many people see these changes as changes for the better?
Our study provides evidence that decreasing the number of abortion restrictions across the states may [emphasis mine] reduce incidence of death during pregnancy and postpartum among all women in the US
Well you know what? It may not. That's an awfully tepid argument considering the abomination against life that you're trying to implement. I wonder how many lives the ban saved.
You referred to my other reply, where I quoted the dictionary definition of "in droves" for you, as "cope". Do you even know what the words you use mean? Rhetorical question. You clearly do not.
On the heels of a decisive Trump victory the only thing I have to cope with is your degeneracy and unbridled ignorance, but there's no way you could have meant that since you lack the self awareness.
I can't fathom how you and your ilk somehow make everything about (and, tiresomely, only about) abortion. In the feeblest attempt to support your ridiculous claim that women will "die in droves" you made dumb references out of left field to freak occurrences that have absolutely nothing to do with Trump's win, then to make your argument EVEN STUPIDER you moved the goalpost about what "in droves" even means (apparently, to you, that's any more than 1 out of the more than 150 million women in the US).
You also stated falsehoods (who said anything about a nationwide ban), deployed impenetrable communistic newspeak ("freedom is slavery! murder is healthcare!"), asked ludicrous rhetorical questions ("why don't republicans campaign on [socialism]"), made up absurd stories that suggested having a child is a "death sentence" (it's not, even in the extreme case you put forward), and included some false equivalence for good measure (your side celebrates abortion as a means to consequence free hedonism, not as "health care" to prevent a "death sentence" for someone "who just got raped").
I narrowed in on your hilarious misuse of "in droves" because I don't want to argue with you about abortion, and it's not that I couldn't see the numerous obvious flaws in your "reasoning", just as plainly as I do now, but actually it's just that I find your love of the practice too distasteful and grotesque to even want to debate you about it. I am tired of talking about it and I can't stomach another conversation about how it's "actually a good thing" when we all know what it is in reality (and speaking of "in droves", you ignorant cunt).
I had to edit it down to be simple enough for you to understand.
Your delusions are making you hysterical. Get a grip. Everything you said there is wrong, degenerate, AND dumb.
Women will die by the droves.
What a fucking drama queen. Are you seriously this stupid?
Plus taxes will go up except for rich rapists and Elon.
You think he's going to raise taxes for everyone except... checks notes "rich rapists", and Elon specifically? I'm confused, do you think all rich people (except for Elon, presumably, since you were kind enough to make a distinction there) are rapists, or do you suppose Trump's going to add a provision that states one must both be rich, and a rapist, to benefit from paragraph 24 subsection 17 of the tax cuts for wealthy billionaires bill that will definitely be coming along any day now, according to you.
His tactics gave him away: willful misrepresentation of his opponents arguments, regurgitation of fallacious (but monied) mainstream talking points, stubborn ignorance of any information that contradicts his narrative, constant deflection, rudimentary attempts at automation (copy pasting the same insipid “retorts” everywhere, even going so far as to quote out of context so his reply fits), redundant appeals to authority, demands for sources and citations that flippantly dismiss any that aren’t ideologically aligned, inhuman persistence, irrational partisanship, vernacular of wokeisms that verge on parody… I was leaning bot but this post-election silence has me thinking he was a paid 10 cent army troll. The overlap in a Venn diagram between paid trolls and mentally ill communists has to be substantial though.
Worst troll I’ve ever seen. Whatever they were paying him, it was too much, and I advise whoever paid him to post this junk to ask for their money back because his attempts at trolling were just plain lazy.
Enjoy full use of the alphabet while you can tuchodi because tomorrow the only letters you’ll have are R and EEEEEEEEEE
You’re wrong
We'll just bookmark that little piece of prognostication for use on Wednesday folks.
Quoted in full, tuchodi.
You’re so starved for validation that you have to quote people out of context so it seems like they agree with your demented ideas. Pathetic.
P r O J E C T I O N
Ԁ ɹ O ſ Ǝ Ɔ ┴ I O N
November 11th is coming up. Since I can hardly imagine the likes of you using that day to remember the troops who died for your freedom, how about you use it to remember you’re an idiot instead.
Exactly how I imagine tuchodi looks.
Not a she, Xi. Nobody here is.
You’re wrong. Not only will Harris lose, she’ll lose by a lot, but here you’ll be, denying reality and spouting false facts from one of the sources you so love, that turn out to have zero predictive power in reality. Not only are you a village idiot, you’re a lunatic too.
A commie professor said it, must be true.
In a Vox interview from the time, he described fascism's key components as "identifying enemies, appealing to the in-group (usually the majority group) and smashing truth and replacing it with power."
Ironic.
Unintentional satire. Nice.