I wonder if Doug Ford will beg to take that batch off America's hands because it's better than nothing.
Doug Ford? Acting pathetic? Surely you jest.
I seem to remember when Trudeau asked for the ability for spending authority for two years, and parliament voted him down. Looks like he found a way to do it anyway.
He said he'd battle it.
He didn't say that he'd WIN.
In other words, Canadians who were Trump supporters are not allowed to choose appropriate representatives.
Sometimes you just have to accept that the party has more than a few cucks in it, and also that dairy farmers bought party memberships for the explicit purpose of keeping the protectionist status quo.
The Conservative race works a bit differently. They do elections until one person gets more than 50% of the vote, and each time they drop off the last-place candidate. The backers of lower candidates picked Scheer because a lot of them were connected to the dairy industry and they absolutely couldn't abide getting rid of our Soviet-style dairy supply management system.
I'm not big on social media. To me, it's vain. I'll cheer on Gab from the sidelines.
Yes, it is possible that it helped this woman,” Russo said. “But the trials and testing are ongoing."
Says it all. "Yeahhhhh, it saved her life, buuuuut I dunno if we should use it."
Lockdowns work if you realize what the goal is. Hint: not to stop the spread of the virus.
Gotta make those examples early.
Cool! I'm sure the courts will get right on that when it happens.
But what happens when provinces, cities or private businesses implement it?
Well that's why the mask boxes now say that they don't prevent disease.
It doesn't stop the government from forcing you to wear one.
We'll never, ever have one. Here's why.
Our Trump would truly love Canada and want what's best for ALL Canadians, not just Canadians in one region.
Every Canadian lives in one of said regions and every region believes it's being treated unfairly relative to the other regions. The more self-sufficient provinces want the government to let them keep more of their money - the prairies - and the dependent provinces want more gibmedats (or donnez-mois) even if they're getting WAY more than they put in, because a lot of votes come from there (without naming Quebec.)
Name a province that thinks it's doing fine. I'll wait.
You'd need someone able to either admit his province is taking too much, or to come off as an excuse-making loser pointing a finger at the real culprits. Long story short you'd need a politician with enough balls to stand up to Quebec while garnering enough support to not need its votes. Furthermore you'd need someone rich enough to fund his own campaign, but in a business that's not heavily protected by the government (such as telecommunications or transportation. No Rogers or Bombardier people.)
NOW, if we had some electoral reform, scrapped the requirement that Quebec must have a certain number of seats (there's Quebec again, fucking up the whole system) and put in some more realistic representation, a Trump might be able to emerge. Until then? No chance.
The money was a token gesture. They didn't get their land back, and even if they attempted to use the money to BUY their land back, there's nothing stopping the government from seizing it again.
It was also explained that liberals tend to smile “more intensely and genuinely,”
Intensely, absolutely believe.
Genuinely, press X to doubt.
Cara Zwibel, director of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association’s (CCLA) fundamental freedoms program, worries that implementing more travel restrictions across the country would violate our Charter of Rights and Freedom.
Oh, NOW it would? We've had charter violations since March and you guys didn't say shit.
Remember when people used to say "Don't attribute to malice that which can be adequately attributed to incompetence?"
In this case it's the other way around. Lindsey Graham is calling it incompetence, but the only possible explanation is malice.
They're trying to erase people from history, just like Stalin and that photo.
Send them a slide of poop.
Being a "party member" doesn't mean you're a candidate. It means you have the ability to nominate candidates (which probably won't be relevant until the party gets bigger.)
Shit's not adding up to me.
Canadians are moving away from cities because house prices are unaffordable.
House prices are still going up in said cities because of immigration.
So...the only people who can afford said expensive houses are immigrants coming to Canada for a "better life?" If you can afford a million-dollar house, your life has to be pretty fucking good already.
Or could it be that the article is hiding the fact that house prices are REALLY going up because the Chinese are buying real estate speculatively and then not occupying it?
If you're going to lose, lose confidently and with pride!
Chris Selley: I'm the biggest cuck writing for the Post!
Kelly McParland: Hold my soy.
Man, I remember when you could count on McParland for good articles. These days he's falling all over himself to pander to the left.