1
foecom 1 point ago +1 / -0

Now is the time to make it crystal clear that some doors will open to the vaccinated and some will remain closed to the unvaccinated.

Doors opened: freedom, bodily autonomy, dignity
Doors closed: tyranny, oppression, communism

1
foecom 1 point ago +1 / -0

That implies I’m willing to take the vaccine as long as they give me money for any adverse effects that appear later.

3
foecom 3 points ago +3 / -0

Great effort, will look dope on your fridge, but for our provincial flag it’s gonna be a no from me dawg

3
foecom 3 points ago +3 / -0

The idiom about cutting off your nose to spite your face comes to mind. They know not what they do, but that doesn’t make them worthy of forgiveness.

3
foecom 3 points ago +3 / -0

So they’re desecrating a country and their front line warriors are pink haired women but they think they’re going to win.

12
foecom 12 points ago +12 / -0

All blood is equal

Literally not true under any interpretation.

1
foecom 1 point ago +1 / -0

I should not have qualified that observation because it applies to the American institution as well.

5
foecom 5 points ago +5 / -0

Good question. I don’t know the whole acronym but I guess the c stands for communism, and the p, I don’t know, pandering? Cowardly Pandering Communists - how’s that?

1
foecom 1 point ago +1 / -0

Canadian education has long been coopted by Marxist radicals and has more to do with indoctrination than it has to do with education. That’s where communism comes in. I won’t respond if you ask me to explain how education is compromised by communistic ideologies. You can’t reach someone who refuses to see what’s right in front of their face.

2
foecom 2 points ago +2 / -0

Right wingers are objectively better looking. Facts.

1
foecom 1 point ago +1 / -0

You seem to have missed my point and contradicted a statement pulled out of thin air. ≤ means less than or equal. ≤High school means an education of high school or less. Nothing I said was incorrect and we are in agreement about definitions.

I am saying that two distinct groups - people without high school, and people with only high school - are being conflated, and that since this cohort will be disproportionately composed of - dominated by - people with high school, polling that group won’t tell you what “dumb uneducated people” think, if that’s your counter argument and reason for calling out OP for cherry picking data.

1
foecom 1 point ago +1 / -0

Those CBC comments though, man. Doubtful they’ve used their backbones a day in their life. May posterity forget that they were our countrymen.

1
foecom 1 point ago +1 / -0

≤ means less than or equal and since the equal group dominates the less this doesn’t tell us what people with less than high school think. Also, educational attainment under communist doctrine is less correlated to intelligence than you might think. I’d posit the bell curve is just flatter there, and propaganda targets those hovering around average or below.

4
foecom 4 points ago +4 / -0

Accidental medical errors, yes, but I also believe hospitals are one the many institutions that have been infiltrated and corrupted by a malignant evil. I think nurses cautioning people to avoid the hospitals early on in the pandemic was a many-layered plea.

1
foecom 1 point ago +1 / -0

They envy our humanity so they want to take it away

5
foecom 5 points ago +5 / -0

It’s war then

2
foecom 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’d call it commies doing commie things but sure, fascism works too.

2
foecom 2 points ago +2 / -0

At first I get angry but then it gives way to happiness as I am reminded of how easily my enemies are dominated, conquered, and controlled.

1
foecom 1 point ago +1 / -0

Her lack of self awareness is truly astonishing.

1
foecom 1 point ago +1 / -0

The majority of Canadians apparently like sticking their bottoms up and bending their curves down. Who cares what this woman wants? She should keep her warped perversions and delusions of power to herself.

2
foecom 2 points ago +2 / -0

Does that look like the face of an ethical man, or is that a smug jellyfish? Funny how he thinks he’s discrediting the other side, when the only person losing face because of that article is the author himself. Certainly not the bioethicists in opposition! Don’t let jellyfish tell you what to do.

view more: Next ›