Totally agree. I think the by far weakest link in the chain was the decline and ultimate extreme lack of strong traditionally masculine men. THAT lacking of men in itself, has been what left an open gateway that has allowed EVERYTHING else to come in; the lgbtq nonsense, feminism, relativism, de-sanctification of sex and the family, The cultural loss of respect and awe of the Lord, you name it. None of these things could have come to pass were there a culture full of strong men; the leaders of their families, being anchors in society upholding all that is good and holy, and having clear discernment of evil. (No misplaced compassion). It’s a great tragedy but thankfully it’s clear how to fix it; starting with ourselves as men today. Raise a strong conservative, BIG family, based in the truth and unashamed of it. Call evil out for what it is and fight against it; never give up. The world needs strong men to save it even though to be honest at times it doesn’t seem worth saving with the present culture. But when I think of kids today growing up
In this hellhole, forced to wear masks, told stories in kindergarten about trans rights and “Johnny has two fathers” bs, it makes my blood boil. THAT is our cause. Fight for the kids and the few brothers/patriots out there, as well as the women who are worthy and need men on guard for them.
Yeah, I was born in the late 70s and I don't ever remember feeling like Canada was such a great country. It's always felt like it's steadily sliding down the garbage chute.
Indeed, you could pinpoint Canada's decline to 1918, when women were granted the right to vote. Cucks have been gradually expanding their rights and influence ever since.
Emasculation is a very real phenomenon and continues to this very day.
Try 1960s. Diefenbaker abolished the racial requirement for citizenship in 1962. Pearson established the commission on bilingualism and biculturalism in 1963, which paved the way for official bilingualism and multiculturalism in 1971. He set up the point-based system for immigrant selection in 1967 to ensure the immigration process was nondiscriminatory. Trudeau began diversifying the immigration streams in the late 1960s.
A compelling view of modern Canadian history is that the Mulroney, Chretien, and Harper administrations, 30 years of political will, were all entirely spent pulling Canada out of the mire PET drove us into. Of the three, ironically it was the Liberal Chretien that did the best job. Harper had begun reasserted the importance and primacy of Canadian culture in Canada. Then 2015 comes along and we get a less intelligent successor to Trudeau intent on driving us straight back into the bog.
True. The decline began in earnest in the early 1960s and really accelerated in the early 1990s. I don't know why so many people are dating it to the 2010s. Things really went off the rails by then, sure, but the decline has been going on for decades.
I've always told my wife the beginning was when women got the right to vote. I even wrote a great paper in college backing this thought in 2008, and the lady gave me a C+.
I am a millenial, so I can't comment to much on the pre 1990s, but I would have to say that the advent of phones/social media has really degenerated our culture to one of vane hedonism, sprinkled in with a little bit of woke virtue signaling to give us a false sense of moral superiority.
The advent of social media and phones has also completely destroyed our social fabric and has atomized/divided us into malleable dopamine-thirsty slaves, incapable of holding a conversation or being able to exist without looking at your phone for more than a couple of hours.
Pierre Trudeau selling the bank of canada to international cartel that now enslaves us with debt and demands GDP growth and in turn mass immigration for more debt slaves is the starting point for the collapse in Canada. GBA+ and other 90's policies were implemented to prevent any opposition and accelerate the collapse.
The first Trudeau administration. I'm honestly not sure how far-sighted he was or what his intentions were. The simplest narrative i can construct about it is that PET was charged with governing a country made up of two dissimilar nations that didn't really like each other, to the point where a parting of ways seemed like not the worst outcome. His solution to the two-nation dilemma was to denature both; render down Anglo-Canadian culture and Habitant culture into a homogeneous, textureless post-national Canadian consumer at which point separatism would be a moot point. As solutions go, it might even have worked, except he also had no particular love or concern for the Canadian people over and above all the rest of the world. A culture may be re-asserted following a genereration of suppression and degradation, but when a gene pool is debased, there's very little that can be done to restore the ancestral stock of the nation.
The Habitants were a nation in a much stronger sense than anglo-Canadians were, as we were never truly cut off from the UK. Look at them now. All that matters is that you speak French. There is no nationality in them. The bottom 10% of the HDI is a fine pool of immigrants to draw from, so long as they speak French!
The 1970s are also when feminism became prominent, leftists started to dominate the universities and multi-culturalism was officially adopted by the federal government.
So...1970 was roughly the beginning of the end for this country.
I remember when a lot of the immigrants were English, which was a long time ago. There was this old man who used to tell us stories about his service under Montgomery in North Africa. A lot of these English were nice people. Mulroney increased the numbers in the early 1990s and we started getting a different kind of immigrant. He was literally shovelling third world criminals into the country. The gang wars in 1990s Toronto, when the Jamaicans and Chinese triads were shooting it out for turf were the direct result of Mulroney's immigration policies and garnered a lot of media attention back then, although few remember it.
Nah, things really started going downhill in the early 1990s. That's when Mulroney ramped up the immigration. By 1995, Parizeau was able to blame the loss of the referendum on the ethnic vote.
It all goes back to women's rights. Giving women the right to vote in 1918 was what enabled the expansion of the state in the 1940s, culminating in the federal SJWism of the 1960s. Things really became difficult after that. Putting women and later immigrants in the workforce intensified competition for jobs, put downward pressure on wages and made it so you could no longer support a family on a single income.
That's a common misconception. Trudeau Sr. didn't increase the immigration rate, he diversified it. Brian Mulroney was the one who increased it back in the early 1990s.
Totally agree. I think the by far weakest link in the chain was the decline and ultimate extreme lack of strong traditionally masculine men. THAT lacking of men in itself, has been what left an open gateway that has allowed EVERYTHING else to come in; the lgbtq nonsense, feminism, relativism, de-sanctification of sex and the family, The cultural loss of respect and awe of the Lord, you name it. None of these things could have come to pass were there a culture full of strong men; the leaders of their families, being anchors in society upholding all that is good and holy, and having clear discernment of evil. (No misplaced compassion). It’s a great tragedy but thankfully it’s clear how to fix it; starting with ourselves as men today. Raise a strong conservative, BIG family, based in the truth and unashamed of it. Call evil out for what it is and fight against it; never give up. The world needs strong men to save it even though to be honest at times it doesn’t seem worth saving with the present culture. But when I think of kids today growing up In this hellhole, forced to wear masks, told stories in kindergarten about trans rights and “Johnny has two fathers” bs, it makes my blood boil. THAT is our cause. Fight for the kids and the few brothers/patriots out there, as well as the women who are worthy and need men on guard for them.
Yeah, I was born in the late 70s and I don't ever remember feeling like Canada was such a great country. It's always felt like it's steadily sliding down the garbage chute.
Indeed, you could pinpoint Canada's decline to 1918, when women were granted the right to vote. Cucks have been gradually expanding their rights and influence ever since.
Emasculation is a very real phenomenon and continues to this very day.
Try 1960s. Diefenbaker abolished the racial requirement for citizenship in 1962. Pearson established the commission on bilingualism and biculturalism in 1963, which paved the way for official bilingualism and multiculturalism in 1971. He set up the point-based system for immigrant selection in 1967 to ensure the immigration process was nondiscriminatory. Trudeau began diversifying the immigration streams in the late 1960s.
A compelling view of modern Canadian history is that the Mulroney, Chretien, and Harper administrations, 30 years of political will, were all entirely spent pulling Canada out of the mire PET drove us into. Of the three, ironically it was the Liberal Chretien that did the best job. Harper had begun reasserted the importance and primacy of Canadian culture in Canada. Then 2015 comes along and we get a less intelligent successor to Trudeau intent on driving us straight back into the bog.
No fault divorce. Pierre Trudeau.
People who think this started or accelerated in the last twenty years haven't been paying attention. That's only when you noticed it.
True. The decline began in earnest in the early 1960s and really accelerated in the early 1990s. I don't know why so many people are dating it to the 2010s. Things really went off the rails by then, sure, but the decline has been going on for decades.
I've always told my wife the beginning was when women got the right to vote. I even wrote a great paper in college backing this thought in 2008, and the lady gave me a C+.
I am a millenial, so I can't comment to much on the pre 1990s, but I would have to say that the advent of phones/social media has really degenerated our culture to one of vane hedonism, sprinkled in with a little bit of woke virtue signaling to give us a false sense of moral superiority.
The advent of social media and phones has also completely destroyed our social fabric and has atomized/divided us into malleable dopamine-thirsty slaves, incapable of holding a conversation or being able to exist without looking at your phone for more than a couple of hours.
Pierre Trudeau selling the bank of canada to international cartel that now enslaves us with debt and demands GDP growth and in turn mass immigration for more debt slaves is the starting point for the collapse in Canada. GBA+ and other 90's policies were implemented to prevent any opposition and accelerate the collapse.
The first Trudeau administration. I'm honestly not sure how far-sighted he was or what his intentions were. The simplest narrative i can construct about it is that PET was charged with governing a country made up of two dissimilar nations that didn't really like each other, to the point where a parting of ways seemed like not the worst outcome. His solution to the two-nation dilemma was to denature both; render down Anglo-Canadian culture and Habitant culture into a homogeneous, textureless post-national Canadian consumer at which point separatism would be a moot point. As solutions go, it might even have worked, except he also had no particular love or concern for the Canadian people over and above all the rest of the world. A culture may be re-asserted following a genereration of suppression and degradation, but when a gene pool is debased, there's very little that can be done to restore the ancestral stock of the nation.
The Habitants were a nation in a much stronger sense than anglo-Canadians were, as we were never truly cut off from the UK. Look at them now. All that matters is that you speak French. There is no nationality in them. The bottom 10% of the HDI is a fine pool of immigrants to draw from, so long as they speak French!
This website shows how income inequality increased dramatically since 1971. https://wtfhappenedin1971.com/
The 1970s are also when feminism became prominent, leftists started to dominate the universities and multi-culturalism was officially adopted by the federal government.
So...1970 was roughly the beginning of the end for this country.
I remember when a lot of the immigrants were English, which was a long time ago. There was this old man who used to tell us stories about his service under Montgomery in North Africa. A lot of these English were nice people. Mulroney increased the numbers in the early 1990s and we started getting a different kind of immigrant. He was literally shovelling third world criminals into the country. The gang wars in 1990s Toronto, when the Jamaicans and Chinese triads were shooting it out for turf were the direct result of Mulroney's immigration policies and garnered a lot of media attention back then, although few remember it.
https://youtube.com/channel/UCMRs0Ml8RF0cWVAOeQeBxTw
This guy has a lot of great videos explaining what happened to the west.
Profligae credit and baseless currency are the best was to destroy a country.
Nah, things really started going downhill in the early 1990s. That's when Mulroney ramped up the immigration. By 1995, Parizeau was able to blame the loss of the referendum on the ethnic vote.
It all goes back to women's rights. Giving women the right to vote in 1918 was what enabled the expansion of the state in the 1940s, culminating in the federal SJWism of the 1960s. Things really became difficult after that. Putting women and later immigrants in the workforce intensified competition for jobs, put downward pressure on wages and made it so you could no longer support a family on a single income.
That's a common misconception. Trudeau Sr. didn't increase the immigration rate, he diversified it. Brian Mulroney was the one who increased it back in the early 1990s.