Or, was necessary to prevent people who don't believe in proven science from administering malpractice, as well as being more efficient spreaders and more susceptible to a disease they'd be in close contact with.
Keeping virus spreaders away from sick people.makes a certain amount of sense. Must be really important if they do it when the healthcare system is already stressed.
Meanwhile, you continue to ignore all the breakthrough cases in your spreader thesis which should conclude that the vaxxed are the real spreaders. But it's OK to be a spreader if you're morally superior. Because, you know, science.
The vaxxed are less of a threat to the vulnerable. They are "two-thirds less likely to be asymptomatic", carry viral loads for less time, and shed a weaker form of the virus. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2786040. The vulnerable should be exposed only to the vaxxed if possible.
the vaxxed are the real spreaders.
The vaxxed are less likely to go to the hospital when they are sick, thus reducing the load on the healthcare system. Go to https://covid-19.ontario.ca/data and look at how the few unvaxxed are proportionally taking up so many more hospital and ICU beds.
How are they virus spreaders if they are getting tested, while vaccinate nurses aren’t? The vaccinated HCWs have more of a chance to spread the virus considering they don’t even get tested
Most of these people have either caught it and have actual immunity already, or have been working with sick people the last 2 years and haven't caught it at all thus disproving your spreader BS.
Most of these people have either caught it and have actual immunity already
You wish. Show me the numbers.
haven't caught it at all
And you think that means they never will? Hospitals are full of vulnerable people. Having unvaccinated people around raises the risk level to those vulnerable people to an unacceptable level.
Pretending natural immunity is a conspiracy theory makes so much sense
Imagine, a "pandemic", so deadly, making hospitals so busy that they can afford to fire the very same people that help to treat patients?
It's fine. Hire them all back. For all the Kung Flu fear fans, just have them wear a mask and "PPE".... because, masks work...right?
Or, was necessary to prevent people who don't believe in proven science from administering malpractice, as well as being more efficient spreaders and more susceptible to a disease they'd be in close contact with.
Keeping virus spreaders away from sick people.makes a certain amount of sense. Must be really important if they do it when the healthcare system is already stressed.
Meanwhile, you continue to ignore all the breakthrough cases in your spreader thesis which should conclude that the vaxxed are the real spreaders. But it's OK to be a spreader if you're morally superior. Because, you know, science.
The vaxxed are less of a threat to the vulnerable. They are "two-thirds less likely to be asymptomatic", carry viral loads for less time, and shed a weaker form of the virus. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2786040. The vulnerable should be exposed only to the vaxxed if possible.
The vaxxed are less likely to go to the hospital when they are sick, thus reducing the load on the healthcare system. Go to https://covid-19.ontario.ca/data and look at how the few unvaxxed are proportionally taking up so many more hospital and ICU beds.
How are they virus spreaders if they are getting tested, while vaccinate nurses aren’t? The vaccinated HCWs have more of a chance to spread the virus considering they don’t even get tested
Yes they do.
Most of these people have either caught it and have actual immunity already, or have been working with sick people the last 2 years and haven't caught it at all thus disproving your spreader BS.
You wish. Show me the numbers.
And you think that means they never will? Hospitals are full of vulnerable people. Having unvaccinated people around raises the risk level to those vulnerable people to an unacceptable level.