no. you're intentionally misleading people by forcing everyone into a one-size-fits-all approach. you're mixing healthy people under 65, for which even hospitalization is a fraction of 1%, with old and unhealthy people. 100% of "covid deaths" are merely people who died WITH covid rather than FROM covid, and 95% had multiple comorbidities.
covid poses no measurably increased danger to healthy people under 65. walking across the street is more dangerous than covid for healthy people under 65. because the risk is so low, it doesn't take much for vaccine injury from the injections to be more dangerous than covid. and multiple studies are out now proving unequivocally, the vaccine is killing more healthy people under 65 than covid.
For several months, the COVID-19 Data Dashboard has been reporting, for England, all deaths in people who have a positive test. ...
The additional indicators which will be used to calculate daily death figures are: the number of deaths in people with COVID-19 that occur within 28 days of a first positive laboratory-confirmed test. ... the number of deaths that occur within 60 days of a first positive test. Deaths that occur after 60 days will also be added to this figure if COVID-19 appears on the death certificate
Provisional numbers of deaths coded to ICD-10 code U07.1
– Includes deaths with COVID-19 as the underlying cause or contributing cause
– Includes deaths with confirmed or presumed COVID-19
shit, the US doesn't even require a positive test...
In cases where a definite diagnosis of COVID–19 cannot be made, but it is suspected or likely (e.g., the circumstances are compelling within a reasonable degree of certainty), it is acceptable to report COVID–19 on a death certificate as “probable” or “presumed.” In these instances, certifiers should use their best clinical judgement in determining if a COVID–19 infection was likely. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvss/vsrg/vsrg03-508.pdf#page=2
and the NY governor finally admitted it out loud when people were accusing her of bungling the covid response and the numbers shot up. hospitalizations and deaths as counted in most of the west are those WITH covid, not FROM covid. if you die in a drive-by and your swiss cheese corpse tests positive, you're legally a covid death. this is why the numbers are massively inflated.
Third link: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvss/vsrg/vsrg03-508.pdf#page=2 If the hospital is slammed and testing is backed up, and a qualified physician, coroner, or medical examiner says it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it's probably a duck.
no. you're intentionally misleading people by forcing everyone into a one-size-fits-all approach. you're mixing healthy people under 65, for which even hospitalization is a fraction of 1%, with old and unhealthy people. 100% of "covid deaths" are merely people who died WITH covid rather than FROM covid, and 95% had multiple comorbidities.
covid poses no measurably increased danger to healthy people under 65. walking across the street is more dangerous than covid for healthy people under 65. because the risk is so low, it doesn't take much for vaccine injury from the injections to be more dangerous than covid. and multiple studies are out now proving unequivocally, the vaccine is killing more healthy people under 65 than covid.
What makes you believe that? Looking out your window? Or something more rigorous?
are you living under a rock?
it's on the UK PHE website. https://ukhsa.blog.gov.uk/2020/08/12/behind-the-headlines-counting-covid-19-deaths/
it's on the CDC website. https://emergency.cdc.gov/coca/ppt/2020/Final_COCA_Call_Slides_04_16_2020.pdf
shit, the US doesn't even require a positive test...
and the NY governor finally admitted it out loud when people were accusing her of bungling the covid response and the numbers shot up. hospitalizations and deaths as counted in most of the west are those WITH covid, not FROM covid. if you die in a drive-by and your swiss cheese corpse tests positive, you're legally a covid death. this is why the numbers are massively inflated.
From your first link: "the numbers reported have not generally been an over estimate." https://ukhsa.blog.gov.uk/2020/08/12/behind-the-headlines-counting-covid-19-deaths/
Second link: https://emergency.cdc.gov/coca/ppt/2020/Final_COCA_Call_Slides_04_16_2020.pdf Are you saying that people who died of - say - acute respiratory distress syndrome, and who would have lived if they had not had covid, should not be counted?
Third link: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvss/vsrg/vsrg03-508.pdf#page=2 If the hospital is slammed and testing is backed up, and a qualified physician, coroner, or medical examiner says it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it's probably a duck.
Spend some time with the "Weekly number of deaths (from all causes)" chart at https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/excess_deaths.htm
they expressly admit it's WITH covid, not FROM covid in all of them. if you don't want to accept that, you're fucking retarded.
multiple studies are out showing it inflates the #s by easily 50%+. the NY governor this week admitted it's massively inflated.
don't be such a fucking clown. this isn't reddit. that hysterical anti-science bullshit doesn't work here.