I thought maybe you had posted a link to something and I had missed or forgotten it, so I had a look at your comments over the last month to see what you were referring to.
And there's nothing there.
You haven't provided a single source for your ramblings about apartheid. I remember you saying something about Canada being the only country in the world to restrict some kinds of travel, but you never linked to those restrictions, or to any proof that Canada is the only country doing it. So there's nothing to respond to.
So go ahead, mutter all you want, but for the next little while I'll just continue to ask you to give us some hints from the real world about what you're talking about.
You provide plenty of links, why not a link to the evidence backing up the travel bans?
Of course it’s because there is no evidence travel bans on the unvaccinated is necessary, as anyone with the slightest shred of intelligence knows.
If it’s not necessary why would you support it?
Because for you this isn’t about science, it’s about politics, and you’ll always defend any policy of Justin Trudeau including the divisive the policy of segregation, also known as apartheid.
Your opinions are noted. Serious consideration will be given to them when you produce links showing what the restrictions are, and that Canada is the only country in the world that has them.
Nope. Overall the vaccines reduce the severity of the infection if you catch covid.
28 February 2022 "in the six-month period July to December 2021, the estimated relative risk of admission to Jersey General Hospital due to clinical COVID for those aged 40 and over was 3.5-14.4 times greater in those who had received less than two doses of COVID vaccine than in those who received two or more doses of the vaccine." https://www.gov.je/Health/Coronavirus/CoronavirusDocuments/R%20COVID%20Cases%20Vaccine%20Status%20Report.pdf
"Relative risk" is garbage science. The "total mortality" data is where the truth is at and where the data is crude.
Just like Pfizer’s whole relative vs absolute efficacy with the vaccine trials -> 95% relative and 2% absolute.
All your data is old, Nov 2021. After the booster, so after Dec 2021, the crude data is catastrophic for infection rates in the FULLY vaccinated. In dummy speak, for you Tuchodi, crude means, non fictitious. No manually tampered data.
LEAVE THIS POST UP. AND LET THE LUKERS SEE YOUR FRAUD.
Blaming healthy Canadians for spreading a disease they dont have instead of blaming their ineffective vaccine is literally half way to genocide, you find that hilarious, u/buoyantmutant
Trudeau accusing healthy asymptomatic people of being diseased. Forcing them to choose between a medical procedure and their job, you find that funny?
Don’t delete your comment, everyone needs to see what the Left has become
I’ll let this endorsement of you putting the elderly fully vaccinated group together, knowing they are at HIGHEST risk for Covid infection and severe illness, and letting them speak for itself.
Let the lurkers see your mental retardation, your sadism, your emotional bias and psychopathy in all its glory. DO NOT DELETE YOUR POST.
You’re claiming the travel mandates protect the healthcare system (this goal is not mandated in the constitution by the way however freedom of movement is)
“Prove it”- where is the evidence of the effectiveness of this strategy in reaching the goal?
Further what metric will be used to remove the mandate?
Or do we just have to wait until liberals gut feeling says it’s safe? (Which of course will be never)
If she’ll lie about this, she’ll lie about everything else too
I thought maybe you had posted a link to something and I had missed or forgotten it, so I had a look at your comments over the last month to see what you were referring to.
And there's nothing there.
You haven't provided a single source for your ramblings about apartheid. I remember you saying something about Canada being the only country in the world to restrict some kinds of travel, but you never linked to those restrictions, or to any proof that Canada is the only country doing it. So there's nothing to respond to.
So go ahead, mutter all you want, but for the next little while I'll just continue to ask you to give us some hints from the real world about what you're talking about.
You provide plenty of links, why not a link to the evidence backing up the travel bans?
Of course it’s because there is no evidence travel bans on the unvaccinated is necessary, as anyone with the slightest shred of intelligence knows.
If it’s not necessary why would you support it?
Because for you this isn’t about science, it’s about politics, and you’ll always defend any policy of Justin Trudeau including the divisive the policy of segregation, also known as apartheid.
TLDR;
Don’t play stupid, I want the evidence for violating Canadians right to travel by plane and train.
Where is the evidence that saves lives.
Without any evidence you are violating peoples rights based on your political whim.
It’s a crime against humanity.
Also I’m not here to teach you English. Look up the definition of apartheid. That’s what your travel ban is.
Your opinions are noted. Serious consideration will be given to them when you produce links showing what the restrictions are, and that Canada is the only country in the world that has them.
Your opinion is worthless
How about the papers and reports that I post that are published by the people who know what they're talking about?
1. THE FULLY VACCINATED HAVE THE HIGHEST RATE OF COVID INFECTIONS.
2. THE COVID VACCINE FAILED 85% OF HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS
3. Dr Zain Chagla, infectious diseases specialist confirms VACCINE STATUS IS IRRELEVANT IN THE ICU.
Nope. Overall the vaccines reduce the severity of the infection if you catch covid.
28 February 2022 "in the six-month period July to December 2021, the estimated relative risk of admission to Jersey General Hospital due to clinical COVID for those aged 40 and over was 3.5-14.4 times greater in those who had received less than two doses of COVID vaccine than in those who received two or more doses of the vaccine." https://www.gov.je/Health/Coronavirus/CoronavirusDocuments/R%20COVID%20Cases%20Vaccine%20Status%20Report.pdf
Nov. 25, 2021 "Unvaccinated people are about six times more likely to test positive than vaccinated people, nine times more likely to be hospitalized, and 14 times more likely to die from COVID-related complications" https://www.webmd.com/vaccines/covid-19-vaccine/news/20211124/unvaccinated-14-times-more-likely-to-die-from-covid
“Estimated Relative Risk”
LOL!
"Relative risk" is garbage science. The "total mortality" data is where the truth is at and where the data is crude.
Just like Pfizer’s whole relative vs absolute efficacy with the vaccine trials -> 95% relative and 2% absolute.
All your data is old, Nov 2021. After the booster, so after Dec 2021, the crude data is catastrophic for infection rates in the FULLY vaccinated. In dummy speak, for you Tuchodi, crude means, non fictitious. No manually tampered data.
LEAVE THIS POST UP. AND LET THE LUKERS SEE YOUR FRAUD.
lol you drama queens
Blaming healthy Canadians for spreading a disease they dont have instead of blaming their ineffective vaccine is literally half way to genocide, you find that hilarious, u/buoyantmutant
Trudeau accusing healthy asymptomatic people of being diseased. Forcing them to choose between a medical procedure and their job, you find that funny?
Don’t delete your comment, everyone needs to see what the Left has become
Lol rich coming from a Liberal.
The drama queens are the ones freaking out over the flu, LARPing that it’s the plague.
What % of Canadian population died of covid? 0.00001%?
I’d like nothing more for you to be fired from your job and not permitted to travel, without any evidence that the restrictions have an effect.
Then when it upsets you, you get called a drama Queen.
It’s the least you deserve.
Name one country other than Canada that bans domestic travel for the unvaccinated. Provide a link.
That's rich coming from you. You provide no links for your claims, including the one that Canada is the only country doing it.
You first.
Why is it that you require a random internet user to provide you links?
Why do you need that to defend your segregation? Why not just defend it with specific science?
When someone claims something without evidence then responding "Prove it" is a legitimate response. You made the claim, so prove it.
You claim without evidence the vaccine works! You can’t prove it, you just keep posting inaccurate vaccine status from the Ontario Dashboard LOL
Without evidence, you claim federal mandates allowing the old, frail, obese, and high risk fully vaxed to fly together is scientific!! LOL
I guess you missed all those links to the studies I post.
I'm sorry your jealous of them.
I’ll let this endorsement of you putting the elderly fully vaccinated group together, knowing they are at HIGHEST risk for Covid infection and severe illness, and letting them speak for itself.
Let the lurkers see your mental retardation, your sadism, your emotional bias and psychopathy in all its glory. DO NOT DELETE YOUR POST.
What was my claim?
I just want the evidence used to measure the effectiveness of the mandates.
I’m not infringing human rights, the Liberals are.
They’re the ones responsible for defending their infringements not me.
Here's one of them: "Why is Canada the only country in the world that bans unvaxxed children from domestic travel?" https://omegacanada.win/p/15Hbkwfhwa/sudden-death-skyrockets-above-hi/
I'll let you look up the one about apartheid mandates
You’re claiming the travel mandates protect the healthcare system (this goal is not mandated in the constitution by the way however freedom of movement is)
“Prove it”- where is the evidence of the effectiveness of this strategy in reaching the goal?
Further what metric will be used to remove the mandate?
Or do we just have to wait until liberals gut feeling says it’s safe? (Which of course will be never)
You first. You made the unsupported claims. Back them up.