Folks, ScoobyDoo is free to make a post about the fatality rates for covid.
Meanwhile, the focus of this thread, myocarditis, - it's right there in the post's title - is the unwarranted concentration of attention on a rare and usually non-consequential side-effects of vaccination.
Are you deflecting because you're embarrassed that I called you out on your retardedness?
I was calling you out on egregious bullshit. Why even bullshit that 1% of people with covid die from it? Or, maybe you weren't bullshitting and you believe this because you're just too stupid to interpret basic stats.
ScoobyDoo appears not to want to admit that so far 1% of the people who have tested positive for covid have died.
What? It’s in the stats. There’s nothing to admit. Doesn’t change that your 1% of people with covid die claim is bullshit. That’s wrong and you’re just trying to deflect because you’re embarrassed about your retardedness.
By golly you're right. I did say "unlike the 1% of covid victims who die" when I should have said "unlike the 1% of people who test positive for covid who die."
The scarring is permanent. The answer to the question “is myocarditis permanent?” is “no", because the inflammation is not permanent, but that answer is sometimes given in a disingenuous fashion. The answer to the question “does myocarditis cause permanent damage?” is “yes", even though it may be to a small degree in many cases.
Those people who are spreading scary stories about myocarditis never, ever, compare the risks of life changing injury from myocarditis to the same risks from covid.
That sounds like anyone can post. You're going to need proof that it's trustworthy. I suggest you start here, on Quora: "It’s not trustworthy because there is no fact checking and no credential checking. It’s not unusual to see contradictory answers to a question. It’s not unusual to see a clueless opinion presented as fact." https://www.quora.com/Is-Quora-trustworthy
And Bobbysgoat prefers it to the other links in this thread: the American Heart Association, the Canadian Medical Association Journal, the Journal of the American Medical Association, etc.
Folks, ScoobyDoo is free to make a post about the fatality rates for covid.
Meanwhile, the focus of this thread, myocarditis, - it's right there in the post's title - is the unwarranted concentration of attention on a rare and usually non-consequential side-effects of vaccination.
Are you deflecting because you're embarrassed that I called you out on your retardedness?
I was calling you out on egregious bullshit. Why even bullshit that 1% of people with covid die from it? Or, maybe you weren't bullshitting and you believe this because you're just too stupid to interpret basic stats.
Folks, ScoobyDoo appears not to want to admit that so far 1% of the people who have tested positive for covid have died.
They definitely don't want to talk about unnecessarily scary stories being spread about myocarditis.
What? It’s in the stats. There’s nothing to admit. Doesn’t change that your 1% of people with covid die claim is bullshit. That’s wrong and you’re just trying to deflect because you’re embarrassed about your retardedness.
By golly you're right. I did say "unlike the 1% of covid victims who die" when I should have said "unlike the 1% of people who test positive for covid who die."
Now we can kiss and make up.
https://www.quora.com/Is-myocarditis-permanent
An anonymous post on Quora? Really? That says "it may be to a small degree in many cases"?
There is a global pandemic going on, so there is no risk-free scenario. Over 600 milliiom people have tested positive for the virus and of them about 1 in every hundred has died. https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus / https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/
Those people who are spreading scary stories about myocarditis never, ever, compare the risks of life changing injury from myocarditis to the same risks from covid.
Quora is publicly vetted. If you think they are wrong post there
That sounds like anyone can post. You're going to need proof that it's trustworthy. I suggest you start here, on Quora: "It’s not trustworthy because there is no fact checking and no credential checking. It’s not unusual to see contradictory answers to a question. It’s not unusual to see a clueless opinion presented as fact." https://www.quora.com/Is-Quora-trustworthy
And Bobbysgoat prefers it to the other links in this thread: the American Heart Association, the Canadian Medical Association Journal, the Journal of the American Medical Association, etc.
That explains a lot.