Would an independent study prove something about the product was fishy? Release all documentation and discussion around the decision to cancel the eua in India to explain why it was cancelled after the Indian government requested independent study of the product.
Why didn't Canada do the same before unleashing the gene therapy product on Canadians? Were any independent studies done in Canada? No it's okay I know the answer: we outsourced all health decisions for Canadians to other nations to determine if a product is safe to use here bypassing national security procedures.
That is their job. They are supposed to be the experts.
They should of have known outcomes with all the supposed science and tax payer money they receive.
If I was in that business I would be responsible to know my product works and tested before i sent it out into the world.
For example, why are they against other countries running studies to prove the effectiveness of their product?
https://www.reuters.com/article/health-coronavirus-india-pfizer-idUSKBN2A50GE
Would an independent study prove something about the product was fishy? Release all documentation and discussion around the decision to cancel the eua in India to explain why it was cancelled after the Indian government requested independent study of the product.
Why didn't Canada do the same before unleashing the gene therapy product on Canadians? Were any independent studies done in Canada? No it's okay I know the answer: we outsourced all health decisions for Canadians to other nations to determine if a product is safe to use here bypassing national security procedures.
How long would that take you, and what would the virus be doing in the meantime?
How would you handle the variants before they appeared? After almost three years with the virus we are just getting bivalent vaccines now.
They are not. Trials were run in Germany, for one. Your news article is almost two years old. India went with cheaper vaccines.
I repeat: What would have been happening with the virus out in the world while your company was doing its testing?
India went with the option that would allow them to validate efficacy
You skipped the question about what your company would do.
The cure can't be worse than the disease. If you never tested it anything is worse than the disease.
If you outsourced your national security to another country "trusting" that they do the right thing you failed to protect your people.
Trust but verify is an axiom not an option.