The article is bullshit. Read the source linked in the article. Nowhere does it talk about 45 chuches burned down. It's about 45 churches attacked. Maybe try to think for yourself and see behind a pandering website. It shows how easy you are manipulated.
My point is also that only 19 were set on fire. Not even all 19 of these burned down. The other 26 were vandalized with graffiti or break ins. Like in the source of the article. The only joke here is you spreading fake news like you're a reddit commie or something. Maybe start working for the CBC so you can fan the flames even more.
If you want to make a point, don't base it on a lie. Otherwise you're not better than any commie out there.
Trudope called it unacceptable and wrong:
https://globalnews.ca/news/7997859/residential-schools-trudeau-church-burning-arson-vandalism/
Also 45 churches weren't burned down. 45 churches were attacked, which also includes things like vandalism, graffiti or break ins. 19 of them were set on fire.
Gets hired by Harper to "stamp out sexual misconduct" and now this.
I feel like that's something the AZ investigators would understand.
It seems they don't, because exactly this is happening. Elections officials, even Republican ones, confirmed that these two lists don't report the same thing. One list is for mail-in ballots sent out and the other is for all early votes received, mail in and in person. They are comparing the EV32 list to the EV33 list. You can watch the whole hearing. Why are they comparing it when they aren't the same?
it's import that if widespread election fraud happened
It is important. Arizona is controlled by the Republicans. It is controlled by Republicans since 2003. They are making the rules how elections are done in Arizona.
But, mixing in lies which can be easily disproven like these 74k votes or that Dominion switched votes in Georgia, will make an election fraud argument weaker and weaker.
From my observations
And from my observations partners or former partners are more likely to kill their girlfriend/wife or whatever. This is everything I said, but you just dismissed it by "most likely scenario does not make it a common occurrence". I'm dismissing your argument that black men are more likely to kill their white girlfriends with the same logic. Just because it's the most likely scenario does not make it a common occurrence.
Oh you know we don’t keep those stats, we are only allowed to form opinions from censored and quickly forgotten media reports.
It's funny how you are allowed to reduce a stat to one specific criteria, but when I reduce it to one specific criteria it's "most likely doesn't make it common".
It's less likely for a white woman in Canada to be murdered by a black man than a white man.
Oh you know we don’t keep those stats
https://femicideincanada.ca/2020_victims
You're free to come up with these stats.
How many of the 19-million women in this country are killed by black men? Seems even less common after your logic.
Not often are women murdered by their partners
It's the most likely scenario. In 2020 160 women were killed in Canada. In 128 cases the police have found a suspect. 50% of the time it was either the current or a former partner. In 26% of the cases it was another family member, in 14% a friend and in 10% of the cases a stranger.
Maybe because he is already arrested?
No, I won't. You're just playing victim. If he is a Canadian citizen, then he has the same rights as you. Nothing more, nothing less.
Nothing is ramping up. It's all in your mind. Have fun living in Canada for the rest of your life.
Well there's over 74,000 mail in ballots which came in and were counted for which no EV32s exist.
EV32 is the "sent list" and EV33 is the "received list". The discrepancy comes from that people who request a mail-in ballot will show up on the EV32 list, but the EV33 list doesn't only count mail in ballots which were sent back, but also people who voted in person early. This was confirmed by Republicans who worked on the election in Airzona.
https://twitter.com/maricopacounty/status/1415834656528764932
https://twitter.com/Garrett_Archer/status/1415787039866310657
These two lists never had the same amount of people on it, because they count two different groups.
https://twitter.com/Garrett_Archer/status/1415758233692606464
Not even FoxNews is picking this up because they know that this story doesn't have any legs to stand on. We need 100% proof for election fraud and we can't muddy it made up theories which have no backing in reality.
Right now AZ Republicans are trying to recall their state's Biden electors and hold a new election
The only way to remove a sitting president from power is through impeachment. There is no legal way to decertify an election. You would need to amend the constitution for something like that.
I already have three kids and the fourth is coming soon. The only thing which is dying is your pipe dream of secession. And these are not assumptions. This is the truth and you know it.
My ancestors landed here way before yours. Also you're not defending anything.
You wouldn't be worth to be a citizen of these sovereign entities.
Do you want to go by time your ancestors lived in Canada?
If he is a Canadian Citizen, then the answer is yes.
At least he's not giving it out like candy.
Ask Orban how it's playing out.
He paid the Chinese to get millions of doses.
The only thing Trudope did was to print money and organize the vaccines. Nothing else. And nothing special.
A vaccine passport means a 4th indefinite lockdown for unvaccinated people.
"The six magistrates said a state of exception, which does allow the government to suspend basic rights, would have been necessary."
As mentioned in the other thread, the way the Spanish government implemented the lockdown was unconstitutional. They implemented it through the "State of Emergency" declaration, thus the rules for the lockdown didn't have to go through the parliament. If they used a "State of Exception" declaration and had voted on the rules in the parliament, the lockdown would have been constitutional.
Note that the court said how the lockdowns were implemented was unconstitutional.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-57838615
Just declaring a "State of Emergency" and implementing the lockdown without going through the parliament was unconstitutional. The right way would have been to declare "State of Exception" and have the parliament vote on the rules. Also the court said that businesses and people who lost money can't sue the government. Only people who were fined for breaking the rules can sue to get their money back.
I'm telling the truth, you're telling the lies. You're closer to a communist than anything else.