0
RightOfSask 0 points ago +1 / -1

Also known as quitting life.

1
RightOfSask 1 point ago +3 / -2

The fun will start when Ham tiki torches your post.

3
RightOfSask 3 points ago +5 / -2

This is not a historical pic as you can see from the three ear piercings (which wouldn't fly in Nazi Germany) and the fact that she is wearing a Wehrmacht uniform of an officer in a higher position (something unobtainable for women). Google "Wehrmacht military ranks" and you will see that she would be at least a Master Sergeant. Or you can just google the pic and you will see that it's a chick that dresses up as Nazi.

You want historical pictures of the League of German Girls? Here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/League_of_German_Girls

-4
RightOfSask -4 points ago +2 / -6

Your last one didn't have any Swastikas on her helmet. What will be the next one? A girl with a SS uniform standing on a dead Jew?

-3
RightOfSask -3 points ago +3 / -6

Also known as "How to get banned by Ham in two steps".

1
RightOfSask 1 point ago +3 / -2

And as said, that would also be valid for a gay male athlete or a gay male ref.

There are so many factors which could make a ref impartial. You could say a ref who was raised in the New England may by impartial against the Green Bay Packers and thus shouldn't call any games with them. Maybe there is a closet racist ref. Maybe a ref hates the colour purple and thus is impartial in games with the Vikings.

You've got way too much time on your hands if you have think about female refs banging the male athletes, or just maybe cuck fetish, who knows.

-2
RightOfSask -2 points ago +1 / -3

Your point is that these female refs can't be impartial because they want to bang the male athletes. That could be also said about gay male refs.

0
RightOfSask 0 points ago +2 / -2

So what do you think about gay men as refs? Is there also too much sexual tension?

If you have time to complain about refs from the other sex in a game, you don't have any problems. No one cares. The are male refs which aren't impartial and there are female refs which aren't impartial.

6
RightOfSask 6 points ago +6 / -0

MacKay signed the last trade treaty with China. The treaty the protects Chinese investments in Canada from Canadian courts.

8
RightOfSask 8 points ago +8 / -0

Because he thinks he will be up in the polls even more once the vaccine train is at full speed and he's probably right with that. Look at the UK, where Boris Johnson got a serious bump in polls after the vaccination rate accelerated. Same goes for Israel and Netanyahu.

Currently Trudeau would risk another minority government. In two or three months, when vaccines are readily available for the whole population, he can paint himself as saviour of the people and the economy. The US-CAN border will be open again, tourists will flock back, restaurants will be packed ... and so on.

This way Trudeau can achieve a majority again.

15
RightOfSask 15 points ago +15 / -0

Was tweeted out by the CPC Twitter account last night and then deleted.

4
RightOfSask 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm guessing all the anti-capitalist's will bend over backwards to defend it too. "It's a private corporation, they can charge what they want!"

Doubt it. I see the same outrage from the left and the right when pharma companies raise drug prizes.

4
RightOfSask 4 points ago +4 / -0

I wouldn't count on that. During the 2008 recession Harper increased foreign aid from §4.5 billion to $5.4 billion a year.

11
RightOfSask 11 points ago +11 / -0

Won't cut immigration, will balance the budget in 10 years (speak never), will spend the same on foreign aid, speaking about abortion is verboten, the only way to open the economy is to vaccinate enough people, ...

8
RightOfSask 8 points ago +8 / -0

True. Just yesterday the "Conservatives" in the UK introduced a bill that would make "annoying" protests illegal. Up to 10 years in prison if the government finds you annoying.

https://www.businessinsider.com/boris-johnson-outlaw-protests-that-are-noisy-or-cause-annoyance-2021-3

2
RightOfSask 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's not a separate issue. Mussolini failed like any other authoritarian. The obsession of some Conservatives with "authoritarian Christian movements" is as cringe as lefties going around and telling people that "real Communism has never been tried". And the sad thing is that it's mostly young lonely guys who scream "Deus Vult" and think that if they would live in a Christian dictatorship their problems would be solved. But in reality they would end up even worse, e.g.:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lost_boys_(Mormon_fundamentalism)

Also note you didn't address ROME

I don't need to address something that failed and wouldn't work in today's world. The Greek Empire did good for a few centuries. The Ottomans did great for a few centuries. The Romans did good for a few centuries. The Persians did great for a few centuries. The Mongols did great for a few centuries. The Vikings did great for a few centuries. And all of them are dead and nobody uses their form of government today, besides failed states no one wants to deal with.

1
RightOfSask 1 point ago +1 / -0

Mussolini’s govt built some beautiful buildings

And then he ended up swinging from one, like all other authoritarians.

9
RightOfSask 9 points ago +10 / -1

How the turntables. Half a year ago during the BLM riots everybody here waved thin blue line flags and now ...

5
RightOfSask 5 points ago +5 / -0

Diversity quotas aren't just for blacks. Hispanics, women, LBGT, Asians ... all of them qualify.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›