Because along side their psyop it amounts to economic warfare on a biological field.
Nothing in the document you linked recommends a lift of the ban.
It's the second sentence:
Adoption of these recommendations will satisfy the requirements for lifting the current moratorium on certain life sciences research that could enhance a pathogen’s virulence and/or transmissibility to produce a potential pandemic pathogen (an enhanced PPP).
Adoption of recommendations = unban GoF research.
If there is no pandemic, then there is no virus.
No... what don't you understand? A virus can exist, but not be sufficiently different from past corona-viruses to become a pandemic.
Obama didn't lifted the restriction on gain of function research. A review of the rules was launched under Obama in January of 2017. The restriction was lifted in December of 2017, almost a year into the Trump presidency.
So... Obama releases recomendations ... time passes... NIH adopts recommendations. Ergo, Obama is responsible for unbanning the GOF. If you wanted to you could say "Well Trump failed to stop it" but it's not reasonable to say "Trump did it".
CBC: Lol. It's nothing to worry about.
💀:
In young adults, up to 20% of all cases of sudden death are due to myocarditis.[10]
Among patients with HIV, myocarditis is the most common cardiac pathological finding at autopsy, with a prevalence of 50% or more.[32]
One rare instance of myocarditis is viral fulminant myocarditis; fulminant myocarditis involves rapid onset cardiac inflammation and a mortality rate of 40-70%.[36] When looking at different causes of myocarditis, viral infection is the most prevalent, especially in children; however, the prevalence rate of myocarditis is often underestimated since the condition is easily overlooked.[34] Viral myocarditis being an outcome of viral infection depends heavily on genetic host factors and the pathogenicity unique to the virus.[37] One notable instance of viral myocarditis is the involvement of the SARS-CoV-2 virus; fulminant myocarditis from cardiac damage and SARS-CoV-2 has been associated with high mortality rates.
Straw-man.
Climate change is made worse by "environmentalists" who got scared by fukushima into opposing nuclear in germany. So now germany uses way more coal.
Similar in california with the diablo canyon nuclear. Too many new regulations will mean they need to replace the nuclear with something carbonic.
Climate change is made worse by "environmental policies" that force ethanol in fuel.
etc.. etc..
My comment from another thread:
No that's just database replication. When writes are made, it takes a bit of time to replicate to the databases that are read from. So counts can be off until then.
The busier the site the longer it takes.
Well I'm not the guy who claimed that however:
- they were wrong about the mRNA staying at the injection site, they are probably wrong about the mRNA lasting only a few days. VAERS suggests it can last a month
- if they are correct that the flu has all but disappeared, when it does reappear, since normally we get exposed in a sort of rolling manner, we will all get exposed at once and we will all have fewer flu antibodies when we do
- if they are incorrect and the flu is still around, then covid is not nearly as virulent/dangerous as they propagandize, therefore you should not vaccinate since it is: no benefit, some risk
"disables" isn't the right word. But https://europepmc.org/article/PPR/PPR348288
Covid spike does damage. Mrna vaccine makes you produce spikes. Vaccine makes you produce damaging spikes. So your system is busy with that.
No, he's right. Trying to bully either actual Nazis or just a normal person a leftie accused of Nazism, can reinforce the idea in both accused/accusors mind. It will also never disuade a Nazi.
You're cementing the idea "he's a nazi" in your mind. His mind received your attack and was hurt (in some small way, I'm sure he'll be fine). A damaged mind has crazy ideas like "all black/white/Jewish people are bad"
But since Brexit, there are "more barriers, more red tape and much more difficulty to actually come and work over here."
Yes that was the point.
Common feedback from the British nationals placed by Pro-Force was that many of them wanted to 'do their bit' at time of national crisis but did not see this as a long term, viable option
Because...? Because the value of British labor is so devalued from decades of immigration?
It's almost like China used it's influence over health-officials and colluded with politicians to occlude the facts about covid in order to lock us down... oh wait.
Are YOU retarded?
"Agencies that adopt a review mechanism consistent with the provisions specified below will have satisfied the requirements for lifting that agency’s moratorium on certain gain-of-function research"
Translation:
"Agencies that adopt THESE PROVISIONS will have satisfied the requirements for lifting that agency’s moratorium on certain gain-of-function research"
i.e. "It was up to the Trump admin to to decide what these review mechanism are. And the Trump admin, almost a year after Obama left, decided that these review mechanism are enough." is a load of bull. Obama admin laid out: if you do a,b,c then GoF = unbanned. It's true that Trump admin could have/should have intervened and changed the rules "No even if you do a,b,c, GoF = banned" but they didn't know to.