posted ago by CanadianRighty ago by CanadianRighty +10 / -4

If there were a category of unvaxxed that were lower risk than a certain category of vaxxed, should those vaxxed people still be permitted to dine in restaurants while those unvaxxed are not permitted? If so please explain the scientific reason.

Comments (18)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
DoggyDawg 6 points ago +7 / -1

Uhhh… you listen to liberal media.

tuchodi -7 points ago +2 / -9

That doesn't qualify me to answer the question either.

DoggyDawg 9 points ago +9 / -0

No, i was responding to where you say you listen to scientists. That’s not true; you listen to select scientists, liberal-approved scientists.

Urallfucked -3 points ago +2 / -5

I wonder why there's no credible conservative antivax scientists 🤔

DoggyDawg 2 points ago +2 / -0

Huh? Conservatives are antivax? I’m antivax? You’re making mindless assumptions like CP24 is training you to do.

CanadianRighty [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because when a scientist reports something a leftist disagrees with they are labeled as a not credible and removed from the discourse.

Becasue that's how low IQ leftists think science works

tuchodi -5 points ago +1 / -6

select scientists

The 99.9%

The ones peddling the bullshit - sincere as they may be - tend to be ex-eye doctors (Rand Paul), chiropractors, philosophers, etc.

If you know any infectious disease experts who agree with you and make their living in the public health sector please let me know.

DoggyDawg 2 points ago +2 / -0

99.99% in your mind because you’re being actively prevented from hearing from them. Here’s just one example:

CanadianRighty [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Uhhh you're going to need to post a source for the 99.9% stat you referenced.