If there were a category of unvaxxed that were lower risk than a certain category of vaxxed, should those vaxxed people still be permitted to dine in restaurants while those unvaxxed are not permitted? If so please explain the scientific reason.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (18)
sorted by:
Uhhh… you listen to liberal media.
That doesn't qualify me to answer the question either.
No, i was responding to where you say you listen to scientists. That’s not true; you listen to select scientists, liberal-approved scientists.
I wonder why there's no credible conservative antivax scientists 🤔
Huh? Conservatives are antivax? I’m antivax? You’re making mindless assumptions like CP24 is training you to do.
Because when a scientist reports something a leftist disagrees with they are labeled as a not credible and removed from the discourse.
Becasue that's how low IQ leftists think science works
The 99.9%
The ones peddling the bullshit - sincere as they may be - tend to be ex-eye doctors (Rand Paul), chiropractors, philosophers, etc.
If you know any infectious disease experts who agree with you and make their living in the public health sector please let me know.
99.99% in your mind because you’re being actively prevented from hearing from them. Here’s just one example:
https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.wsj.com/amp/articles/fauci-collins-emails-great-barrington-declaration-covid-pandemic-lockdown-11640129116
Uhhh you're going to need to post a source for the 99.9% stat you referenced.