She admitted to not have any comprehension of the propaganda she posts. She admitted not having a science background, she does not understand statistical analysis and she doesn’t even know when data is being “adjusted”.
She is an uninformed propagandist rat. Pushing an experimental injection that was claimed to be safe and effective after a 4 month trial, performed on 40,000 test subjects.
4 month trial.
On 0.000005% of the world population.
This analogy is written by an immature individual without a science and math education.
No Tuchodi, the analogy here is you fell for a scam. Fauci and Pfizer sold you an mRNA injection that was never able to get FDA approval since 1990. They sold you this based on the 95% relative vaccine efficacy, after a 4 month trial. Now, after 2 years, the absolute efficacy is 2%. And you fell for it.
From the start u/canuck55 and other logical minded individuals did not believe accepting an injection after a 4 month trial period was reasonable. But you did Tuchodi, you fell for it.
Not everyone understand statistical analysis but others understand how easy it is to manipulate you with it. You were sold you an experimental injection, and you didn’t question anything.
April 21, 2022 New England Journal of Medicine "A BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 booster after either the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or BNT162b2 primary course substantially increased protection" https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2119451
May 4, 2022 New England Journal of Medicine "After two doses, both vaccines were equally effective against severe disease caused by the omicron variant." https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2202061
Your “studies” count SUSPECTED COVID CASES and SUSPECTED COVID DEATHS”. None of your suspected Covid cases or deaths were PCR tested. Do you find that scientific Tuchodi?
Your scam “studies” have to use OLD 2020 DATA from when EVERYONE WAS UNVACCINATED!!! LOL
You post garbage science and trash methodology that you don’t have a clue how the conclusions were made, you just copy paste a headline. But in reality your study’s method is “inferential, or estimated, or fictitious” and has to use outdated data that hides the real 2022 catastrophic truth. Your data is fraudulent.
Just like you.
From the best journals and institutions in the world. Your shit comes in the form of pictures of media articles. You don't know science when it's staring you in the face.
Since Nov. 30, children ages 12 years plus four months and adults must show proof they're fully vaccinated to board domestic flights, to board international flights, to board domestic trains and board cruise ships in Canada.
The federal government introduced the vaccine requirement to coerce vaccination rates to increase.
However, the requirement doesn't apply to everyone. Unvaccinated foreigners in Canada can board a flight departing the country until Feb. 28. And some unvaccinated foreign nationals can still enter Canada, such as refugees, new permanent residents and those visiting Canada for compassionate reasons. But unvaccinated Canadian citizens are not entitled to this privilege.
Tuchodi, don’t forget to include, the science that explaining why the travel ban allows unvaccinated foreigners to board planes.
Are you embarrassed by the fact you support an irrational Trudeau mandate?
Are you embarrassed to share your personal opinion now and explain why you don’t want healthy unvaccinated 30 year old who has a negative PCR test on a plane but.
you want a 75 year old Covid positive and triple vaccinated diabetic on the plane, beside other elderly and high risk passengers?
healthy unvaccinated 30 year old who has a negative PCR test on a plane but. you want a 75 year old Covid positive and triple vaccinated diabetic on the plane
She admitted to not have any comprehension of the propaganda she posts. She admitted not having a science background, she does not understand statistical analysis and she doesn’t even know when data is being “adjusted”.
Which is obvious here: 1) https://omegacanada.win/p/15Hv75oP4t/rates-of-hospitalization-critica/c/ (click before she deletes it)
and here 2): https://omegacanada.win/p/15Hv2MtjxA/x/c/4OYXWolC3ko
She is an uninformed propagandist rat. Pushing an experimental injection that was claimed to be safe and effective after a 4 month trial, performed on 40,000 test subjects.
4 month trial.
On 0.000005% of the world population.
No long term safety data.
You don't have to be a civil engineer in the city planning department to understand the "Walk/Don't Walk" lights at controlled intersections.
This analogy is written by an immature individual without a science and math education.
No Tuchodi, the analogy here is you fell for a scam. Fauci and Pfizer sold you an mRNA injection that was never able to get FDA approval since 1990. They sold you this based on the 95% relative vaccine efficacy, after a 4 month trial. Now, after 2 years, the absolute efficacy is 2%. And you fell for it.
From the start u/canuck55 and other logical minded individuals did not believe accepting an injection after a 4 month trial period was reasonable. But you did Tuchodi, you fell for it.
Not everyone understand statistical analysis but others understand how easy it is to manipulate you with it. You were sold you an experimental injection, and you didn’t question anything.
At a guess I'd imagine you back up about 0.01% of your speculations.
Did the facts hurt your feelings Tuchodi? You were sold an experimental vaccine and told it was safe after a 4 month clinical trial.
And it works. Too bad you continue to look the other way.
07 May 2022 BioMed Central, publisher of scientific journals: "VE against severe COVID-19 for all ages was high overall, with the level being 90% (95% CI, 87–92%) at five months or longer after being fully vaccinated." https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-022-07418-y
April 21, 2022 New England Journal of Medicine "A BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 booster after either the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or BNT162b2 primary course substantially increased protection" https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2119451
May 4, 2022 New England Journal of Medicine "After two doses, both vaccines were equally effective against severe disease caused by the omicron variant." https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2202061
Your “studies” count SUSPECTED COVID CASES and SUSPECTED COVID DEATHS”. None of your suspected Covid cases or deaths were PCR tested. Do you find that scientific Tuchodi?
Your scam “studies” have to use OLD 2020 DATA from when EVERYONE WAS UNVACCINATED!!! LOL
You post garbage science and trash methodology that you don’t have a clue how the conclusions were made, you just copy paste a headline. But in reality your study’s method is “inferential, or estimated, or fictitious” and has to use outdated data that hides the real 2022 catastrophic truth. Your data is fraudulent. Just like you.
From the best journals and institutions in the world. Your shit comes in the form of pictures of media articles. You don't know science when it's staring you in the face.
And you don’t need to be an ethicist to realize that people like you are fucking evil.
Just passing on what the experts say.
Odd that it upsets you.
Same “experts” who tell you to get boosted Tuchodi!!
Your delusions are peeking out. Try to get them under control.
Tuchodi, don’t forget to include, the science that explaining why the travel ban allows unvaccinated foreigners to board planes.
GOT A LINK?
You forgot to provide a link to your quote.
That one too.
You were going to provide a link for that, I think.
Are you embarrassed by the fact you support an irrational Trudeau mandate?
Are you embarrassed to share your personal opinion now and explain why you don’t want healthy unvaccinated 30 year old who has a negative PCR test on a plane but. you want a 75 year old Covid positive and triple vaccinated diabetic on the plane, beside other elderly and high risk passengers?
EXPLAIN
You appear to think a "healthy unvaccinated 30 year old" sitting beside a "75 year old Covid positive" is OK.
What could possibly go wrong?
LINK??
That would be from you, in this thread.
Your uneducated opinion has no value
Yours does?
What’s the equation for relative risk and what’s the equation for absolute risk? This is a simple math question.
Your reply will be your answer.