I’ll wait for you to answer my questions before I answer yours this time.
Do you acknowledge deaths are associated with the vaccines? The discovery of what causes the clotting? That covid isn’t dangerous for small children? Do you acknowledge the studies showing the efficacy of natural immunity? If so why are we forcing them to be vaccinated?
What is the likelihood that there will be more discoveries about the effects of the vaccine? Negative long term effects? Are the chances 0%?
If the vaccine caused more life years to be lost than gained among the small children are you comfortable with mandating it on that cohort?
You have no expertise in infectious diseases, yet you’re perfectly willing to ignore and discredit the vast array of studies completed by leaders in their field that contradict your position.
Instead of reviewing those detailed peer reviewed studies you dismiss them out of hand, and attack the site that compiles them.
It seems you are in favour of the government inserting itself between the doctor patient relationship in contravention of established norms.
The only reason more doctors don’t prescribe medical interventions as is routine practice with all other disease, is because they are fired or reprimanded for doing so.
Why is it that monoclonal antibodies still aren’t routinely used in most of Canada, yet have also been proven to improve outcomes?
Why is it that the government doesn’t promote healthy living as it’s widely known that obesity only second to age in being the greatest risk factor to covid?
You didn't answer my questions, but I'll answer yours:
No it doesn't bother me- doctors and scientists who question the established narrative are routinely targeted for reprisal. The website doesn't generate ad revenue, and they list studies for many other treatments and drugs. Further I'll also point out this from their site:
"Vaccines and treatments are both extremely valuable and complementary. All practical, effective, and safe means should be used. Elimination of COVID-19 is a race against viral evolution. No treatment, vaccine, or intervention is 100% available and effective for all current and future variants. Denying the efficacy of any method increases the risk of COVID-19 becoming endemic; and increases mortality, morbidity, and collateral damage."
Regardless I'm not interested in the aggregator, I'm interested in the data (67 studies including 46 peer reviewed).
Instead of shooting the messenger why not discredit those studies?
I see your old link from 6 months ago questioning the websites practices, so I'll counter with this:
https://trialsitenews.com/are-major-ivermectin-studies-designed-for-failure/
"There is nothing the enemies of ivermectin will not stoop to including calling ivermectin "horse dewormer,” making it unavailable at pharmacies, failing to report Uttar Pradesh, publishing bias, biased newspaper reporting, and "fake" randomized trials. The "fake" randomized trial has been weaponized by ivermectin's opponents. There isn't the slightest doubt that behind the scenes our government health care agencies, drug companies, and others have conspired to make ivermectin appear ineffective in Lopez-Medina, Together, ACTIV-6 and COVID-OUT. "
I'll close by asking you this- doesn't it bother you that people are being prevented from receiving treatment by pharmacists that was prescribed by their doctor?
What is the purpose of your link? To discredit Ivermectin by showing Google promoted "fact checks"? Does the fact that Japan hasn't stopped using vaccines since allowing the use of Ivermectin somehow demonstrate that it doesn't work? Circular logic.
Here is a link to a series of 67 studies, which clearly demonstrates Ivermectin does work exceedingly well:
I wonder if you're open enough to study the vast and detailed information so easily available to you, or if you have a boycott on material that doesn't align with the MSM/Government narrative, and your existing bias.
Get a copy of a legit passport, from your most trusted person. (less than 5 year girlfriend isn't trusted)
Scan it, photoshop it (this isn't hard use any program or format) take a medium res photo of the forgery. Throw that shit away.
Don't fuck around with this part. Tell your trusted person that the most important part is you each never tell anyone because its criminal fraud
Do not talk to anyone about it at all- pay attention this is critical (this step is for the under 25's and drinkers)
That's it. Act nonchalant and visually show the passport to your manager. It's not being recorded remember.
Just play it cool and always take your lunch to work.
I mean I'm not saying to do this obviously, but anyone easily could under your circumstances, right?
This link contains the 63 studies with control group that demonstrate how effective it is as prophylaxis and treatment:
Thought I posted this earlier, not sure if it got deleted or if I screwed up.
I guess I'll find out shortly.
So as they say, if you can’t beat ‘em join ‘em
😆 fully pretends PPC doesn’t exist
No mention of PPC- doesn’t include them as one of the 5 “main parties”, doesn’t mention them as a fringe party.
CPC was polling at 35-37% late Aug early Sep.
At the same time PPC was polling 5-6%.
You’ll have to go back to Harpers glory days to find better CPC election polling.
At some point the blame for CPCs political failures should rest at their own feet.
I wonder if the dairy lobby was worth it.
Last time CPC probably got about half of the PPC vote on election night from strategic voting.
I doubt the left elements of PPC support will migrate back to the socialists on election night, but many more of the conservative elements will likely strategic vote at the booth.
Shifting left wing votes to the right matters.
A caller asked him about recognizing matural immunity and he pretended he couldnt hear the question.
Haha yeah I know, but it was still a good post.
Yes these deranged lunatics are coming for the kids.
They already force mask small children for hours on end.
Child abuse is nothing for them.
Lvl 10 redpill
Even some of the clapping barking seals on the left must skip a beat when they see this.
Back in 2019 the combined CPC/PPC polled at 33-35, now they poll at a combined 35-40. The election matched the polling with CPC taking some PPC strategic voters.
I understand it’s very difficult for O’Toole to thread this needle, but if conservatives of all stripes can’t see the opportunity in this numbers they might not be politically literate.
Not sure why this one is getting downvoted
This document will greatly aid in the facilitation of medical segregation by public and private organizations across the country.
When a party loses voters, they should look inward instead of blaming those they’ve alienated.
Fuck China, we can damage them more than they can damage us.
I seem to remember O’Toole fielding a question after the debate- the caller asking if he would accept natural immunity in lieu of vaccination. He pretended he couldn’t hear the question.
I note he promises 90% vaccination rates. Huh interesting.
I looked up what countries require a formal federal vaccination passport versus simple proof of vaccination for a Canadian to enter. Holy molly there’s none.
I wonder if anyone else can remember when literally everyone said vaccine passports and mandates were conspiracy theories.
The claims that a federal vax passport will only be used for crossing borders aren’t going to age well.
I think about 20-30% of people are pretty pissed off at the handling of covid, especially feeling coercion/force from the vax passports and mandates. I also think a lot of people are very uncomfortable at where this is going for their children.
Union workers, teachers, nurses, city staff, large corporate types etc etc, they’re facing the hardest brunt of these mandates. They’re mostly left wing voters.
A lot of the conservative voters are likely more in entrepreneurial fields, farmers, or work at private smaller and medium companies, and the mandates don’t impact them as much.
We can see PPC is almost certainly a pressure valve for the people I’m describing by studying polling data.
Populist movements have made headlines over the last 5 years for their unexpected successes. I think those who try to put their thumb in the valve risk getting burned.
Well the platform is the same, so they do want to reduce immigration.
I understand that many people view immigration as a sacred cow, but the face scratching shrieks of the woke doesn’t make the concept of lower adjustment anti-immigrant.
I think they still take the racists, but I think that represents a somewhat vocal less than 1%.
Mainstreet polling shows they take at least their fair share of the minority populations, which further damages notions that their current support is mostly racists.
I think they’d be polling high teens low twenties.
Since you refuse to acknowledge my questions, I'll answer with this.
19 children in Canada have died WITH Covid, it appears they all had serious co-morbidities.
2,000 people under 60 have died WITH Covid in Canada so far in total.
The average age of death WITH Covid is virtually same as life expectancy, WHICH MEANS COVID DID NOT DROP THE AVERAGE LIFE EXPECTANCY.
The narrative that people are dying "in droves" is a statistical falsehood (to be polite).
Cowards are so afraid of dying now that they'd salt the earth for future generations for the possibility of a few extra breaths.
"but the medical system is overrun" - why do we have 1/4 - 1/2 of the ICU beds in comparison to the other G7 countries?
"trust the science" -the science says people with natural immunity are more protected than the vaccinated, why are they being forced to take the vaccine?
We know the vaccines cause heart damage in some people, especially children. Any ethical person knows a child's life is worth vastly more than an elderly persons life.
The UK vaccine advisory board (Scientist) recently advised AGAINST vaccinating healthy children out of concern for the rare side effect.
I know you won't digest any of this information, challenge it, or address it because you're too afraid of the possibility that you're wrong. Instead you'll say something about not being qualified to analyze data, or use some other logical fallacy to sidestep these direct points.