3
Ontarian 3 points ago +4 / -1

Well if a judge can force a Christian minister to note majority secular views on anything in what they preach then you don't really have a Christian religion then.

2
Ontarian 2 points ago +3 / -1

They keep moving the goalposts. It used to be about protecting the vulnerable, immunity (rather than vaccine) passports, and 70% being "herd immunity". Now apparently some vulnerable can't get the vaccine or it won't be effective, everybody else, including children under 12 who have 0.0000001% chance of dying, has to be vaccinated and get multiple "booster" shots, and by the way covid is never going away anyways.

0
Ontarian 0 points ago +1 / -1

Sara Singh, NDP deputy leader and MPP for Brampton Centre, says: 'People need to have confidence that this early reopening won't backfire. In order to guarantee that, the Ford government needs to do what the experts are telling them to do: offer everyone in a hot spot a second dose of the COVID vaccine right now.' https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/second-doses-hot-spots-covid-19-vaccines-ontario-1.6057141

0
Ontarian 0 points ago +1 / -1

Are you stupid? The number of cases detected based on limited testing comes nowhere near determining how many people actually are and were ill with covid. It's a bogus stat used to instill fear in gullible people such as yourself.

0
Ontarian 0 points ago +1 / -1

Right Norway also eased restrictions during the summer of 2020 because of economic concerns. Do you actually believe a society should stop functioning for years because of a virus with a 99.99% survival rate? it's insane. Poverty makes people more vulnerable to not just the virus but other poverty related diseases, not to mention mental health problems. Where I am lockdowns resulted in considerably increased numbers of drug overdoses and deaths from these have been higher than covid deaths throughout the entire pandemic, I believe.

-1
Ontarian -1 points ago +1 / -2

That's your Hollywood version. If you're completely unwilling to acknowledge or simply ignorant of how the truth is manipulated during a "crisis" there's no point trying to reason with you. Canada went through this before, during WW1 and WW2. In particular you can educate yourself about government control of "the message" during WW1 by researching somebody named Ernest J. Chambers.

6
Ontarian 6 points ago +7 / -1

Where in Canada is John Hopkins, again?

Here's a question for you. Someone who is ill enough to die "from" covid will be diagnosed as positive in probably every instance, right? However, the manner in which testing is conducted cannot detect the number of people who are currently sick or ever had covid. How do you determine an accurate "case fatality rate" then? Your 2% claim is completely bogus.

0
Ontarian 0 points ago +1 / -1

You can play dumb all you want but the widespread outrage that international flights were still arriving -- esp. from covid hot spots -- after lockdown measures were put in place was very real.

0
Ontarian 0 points ago +1 / -1

They're not, they believe what they're saying, because they're only going on what they're told to say or the info they're provided. If somebody dies because of something that potentially could have resulted from being vaccinated but there is no investigation and the official cause of death is recorded as something else, there's no way of knowing if the death was vaccine related and any "expert" can simply say it wasn't.

7
Ontarian 7 points ago +7 / -0

No, that's the survival rate for those who actually get the (allegedly) test positive for the virus.

4
Ontarian 4 points ago +4 / -0

There's obviously no point in trying to have a rational discussion with you. I suspect if it happened to someone you know you'd still deny it could be possible.

3
Ontarian 3 points ago +3 / -0

A province doesn't have the authority to do somethings like restrict international travel. That's on Trudeau. I think many Albertans would have agreed back in March 2020 that borders should have been closed. But that's racist, remember?

3
Ontarian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Deaths that could be attributed to being vaccinated can easily be "covered up". In order to determine how many people died as a direct result impartial autopsies would have to be performed on everyone who dies within a certain time period after receiving a dose. What are the chances of that happening?

9
Ontarian 9 points ago +9 / -0

I wish him well. But if he's in Alberta where the health care system is virulently left-wing and nurses are willing to politicize covid and even threaten to go on strick I doubt he had much of a chance the minute he ended up in hospital. We all know that 99.99% of people survive without a vaccine, some people, mostly with underlying health issues can become seriously ill, but many of these people still recover. Why a few people are the exception we don't know or they won't tell us. There has to be more to this.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›