No, he is still going around telling people that only he made the vaccines possible and that millions would have died if it wasn't for his Operation Warpspeed.
Everybody should get it:
Johnson says U.K. must live with COVID-19 as he announces easing:
Seems like the opposite is happening.
It's not only how they vote.
Look at all the woke bullshit companies are pulling or how they took over education.
If they are so unsuccessful, you wouldn't see them as threat.
There are satellite pictures of the fire coming in from the south to the town. It didn't start in Lytton.
https://edition.cnn.com/2021/07/01/americas/canada-town-evacuation-extreme-heat/index.html
Then arrest those. Has nothing to do with suspending benefits for those who protest Canada.
Besides the commies on reddit, who's talking about?
No. Free speech is free speech. I don't agree with consequences for anti-government protesters and I don't agree with consequences for anti-Canada protesters. If you're willing to punish the group you don't agree with, don't be surprised if the other side starts punishing the group you agree with.
I know, but as said, it was Diefenbaker who removed all racial barriers for immigration. And it was long after Trudeau Sr that non-European immigration increased significantly.
Liberals Change Immigration Laws to Focus on Non-European Immigration to Secretly Gain more Votes for Liberal party
It wasn't the Liberals who laid the foundation for that. It was Diefenbaker, a Conservative. Diefenbaker was a outspoken anti-racist. In 1962 he changed the only-European immigration policy to a skill-based immigration policy.
https://cpsa-acsp.ca/papers-2007/Triadafilopoulos.pdf
"This is clear when one considers the way that officials characterized the 1962 reforms. According to the Director of Immigration, W. R. Baskerville, the purpose of the change was to “abolish racial discrimination from [Canada’s] policy,” while making it clear that “we shall still give preference in our selection of immigrants to those countries which have traditionally supplied our immigrants.”
"Similarly, in a memorandum to Cabinet outlining the Department’s proposed measures, the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, Ellen Fairclough, noted that the “principal criticisms of Canada’s…immigration legislation” was that “it is based on racial or colour discrimination.” As such, the foremost objective of the revised regulations was “the elimination of any valid grounds for arguing that they contain any restrictions or controls based on racial, ethnic or colour discrimination.”
Also until the mid nineties the majority of all immigrants came in from Europe.
https://www.economist.com/sites/default/files/20161029_WOC090.png
Still waiting for that white boy summer.
They have to do this. Without it neither Apple or Google would allow it on their app stores. Speak it would be dead on arrival.
the youth are really turning on Trudeau
I heard the same in 2019. Go to /r/canada and /r/onguardforthee and they have no issues with shitting on Trudeau. It's not that they are Conservatives, they are NDP voters. OGFT is like 60% NDP, 20% Green and the rest Lib and Con. But in the end it doesn't matter. Twitter and reddit aren't the real world.
I remember how Ezra Levant was so confident that Trudeau would lose to Brazeau. Had to eat his words live on air.
But I'm still not following why I should choose perpetual Trudeau rule by pissing my vote away on the Rhino party or whatever.
A lot of people here have the same feeling about the CPC. They think that they would piss their vote away on O'Toole.
What O'Toole is currently doing leads us to more Trudeau rule. If O'Toole doesn't change something drastically, Trudeau will get a majority in a few months. Nothing what he did so far increased his popularity. Even milkboy Scheer was somehow more effective.
Did O'Toole's 180 on the carbon tax increase his likelihood to get elected? No, it erode his Conservative voter base.
Did throwing out Sloan increase O'Toole's likelihood to get elected? No, it erode his Conservative voter base.
None of this pandering to LPC voters worked so far. And now that the provinces are opening up again Trudeau will not only ride the "look we have almost the highest vaccination rate in the world thanks to me" but also the "I saved your jobs and helped you when Conservative Premiers locked you down" wave, all while O'Toole struggles to keep his voter base from staying at home in the next election.
You really think that Kenney falling behind the NDP in polls in fucking Alberta is because "the cancer on the right flank"?
This forum has like 100 users and freecanda.win even less. You give the people here far more power than they have. It's not because of PPCtards or even Bernier that the CPC with O'Toole is behind the Liberals. Trudeau runs from one corruption scandal into another and yet somehow it's O'Toole who stumbles around like a blind idiot.
Or would I rather my party play the field and say/do whatever is necessary to negotiate a victory and remove the leftists for power
So the move was for Kenney, Ford, Moe, Legault and Pallister (which are all Conservative politicians) to jail pastors? It seems like these actions are eroding the Conservative voter base and thus make a Trudeau win in the next election even more likely.
It didn't burn down, but it was damaged. Seems like they are already working to fix it.
Bernier understands politics, even if he's in only for the money. But the PPC isn't the problem when they poll at 1% to 2% and the CPC at 30% or below. Even with all the PPC voters the CPC wouldn't be able to even get a minority government.
It would be better for the LPC if the NDP, the Greens and the Bloc didn't exist. Yet somehow these aren't crying. And for a joke you seem to take the PPC far too serious. In this poll the PPC got 1% and the CPC 26%. So who is siphoning votes from the CPC? It seems like there are more voters switching to the LPC from the CPC than to the PPC.
If not for these parties left of the LPC, Canada wouldn't move to the left. It's because the LPC has to compete with the NDP, the Greens and the Bloc that you see the LPC adopting more and more ideas of the far left.
And now the PPC is providing that same service for the LPC.
That's how democracy works. If a 1.6% party is somehow able to deny you a win, you are the problem and not the 1.6% party.
The Liberals have the NDP, the Greens and the Bloc (all parties with far more support than the PPC) which try to "eat their votes" and yet they still can easily win elections. If the CPC isn't able to handle even one party with support in the lower single digits to their right, they maybe don't deserve to win.
Defacing statues is indeed not free speech.
Organizing anti-Canada protests is free speech.