4
fortisetliber 4 points ago +4 / -0

What are the chances they're hoping we lose interest once they're done making guinea pigs out of healthcare workers and old folks? Because if the choices are between a largely toothless, incompetent government and a powerful totalitarian government, I'll take the former any day.

4
fortisetliber 4 points ago +4 / -0

Considering pop and cantaloupes have tested positive for "covid", I'm pretty sure all this test is good for is this bullshit psyop.

1
fortisetliber 1 point ago +1 / -0

Someone explain to me again how oil-by-rail is better than pipelines...

2
fortisetliber 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good thing Ivermectin also works!

2
fortisetliber 2 points ago +2 / -0

I supported the monarchy as an institution (not necessarily the personalities involved) when I thought they would act as a check on power mad politicians who attacked our rights. Sadly the controlavirus has shown the monarchy (Queen, GG, LG's) is unwilling to be the constitutional fire extinguisher they're supposed to be.

The American system of checks and balances had merit too, but that's gotten all fucked up and perverted over time also. Not sure what the answer is anymore.

4
fortisetliber 4 points ago +4 / -0

They're trying, but the Pope doesn't speak for all Christians. Lots of conservative protestant denominations would not accept this.

14
fortisetliber 14 points ago +14 / -0

That LPC Steering Committee email was just a larp, right guys? GUYS?

10
fortisetliber 10 points ago +10 / -0

Once they said liquor stores could stay open but churches had to close I knew it wasn't about a fucking virus.

6
fortisetliber 6 points ago +6 / -0

There are. GoGetFunding is one of them I think.

3
fortisetliber 3 points ago +3 / -0

"We need to bring in 20,000 refugees per day to compensate!" - PM Castreau, probably

3
fortisetliber 3 points ago +3 / -0

No, these are not people with good intentions. They are either useful idiots and/or they serve evil, but they do not have good intentions and we should stop giving them the benefit of the doubt. Time to call them out.

2
fortisetliber 2 points ago +2 / -0

The chamber of commerce for my area was one of the most vocal proponents of a mask mandate, and one of their chief officers said that we should be suspicious of people who are exempt from wearing masks.

So yes, many businesses are in on it. They may just be more brainwashed sheep, Marxists, or freemasons, but many are complicit in this evil.

5
fortisetliber 5 points ago +6 / -1

nomorelockdowns.org - give Hillier some back-up.

5
fortisetliber 5 points ago +5 / -0

I don't give a fuck what she or any of these other globalists gargoyles thinks; not complying.

0
fortisetliber 0 points ago +1 / -1

Well just Toronto and Peel for now, but I'm sure these Marxist wing nuts will turn around and try the same thing across the rest of the province as we get closer to Christmas.

Thing is, government is not the authority on how we worship; God is. Keep your churches open.

DO NOT COMPLY.

3
fortisetliber 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sometimes I think a solar flare wouldn't be such a bad thing if it took out all the TV and internet. People couldn't be forced fed their daily diet of Marxist bullshit anymore and people would return to how their ancestors lived.

10
fortisetliber 10 points ago +10 / -0

The fact that we spent hundreds of billions on socialist welfare programs over the past six months instead of spending a few billion building a rapid reaction field hospital force for surge capacity (it's not needed for the controlavirus, but it's still cheaper than what we did) should be a gigantic red flag to everyone that this isn't about some overhyped cold virus, but rather bringing in a new totalitarian order.

Re: native folks' drinking water, I'm confused. If I live in the middle of nowhere and the drinking water sucks, I have a few choices:

  1. Drill my own well and maintain it.
  2. Truck in my water.
  3. Move.

Anyone here care to explain to me why native people can't do one of the above?

10
fortisetliber 10 points ago +10 / -0

These psychotic globalists just turned the normal flu into covid. The 3 year avg for flu tests in Canada for 2017-19 is 25,710 for the whole country. For perspective, Ontario now does 30-40,000 covid tests PER DAY.

We obviously had a lot more flu in past years that we didn't know about because we did hardly any testing. Now that we do more tests per day than we used to do in an entire year, SURPRISE! There's a lot more flu, which they mislabel as covid to take away our freedom.

24
fortisetliber 24 points ago +24 / -0

DON'T. DO. IT. If enough people tell their employer or the govt to piss off, they will be forced to back down. A massive strike would cripple most businesses and they will cave.

5
fortisetliber 5 points ago +5 / -0

Notice that it's the major Christian holidays they go after with their lockdowns? First Easter, now Christmas.

Either way I'm done listening to these Marxist assholes.

3
fortisetliber 3 points ago +3 / -0

How about fuck no.

cc: airlines.

1
fortisetliber 1 point ago +1 / -0

He'll be happy in Gitmo. Land of his forefathers.

4
fortisetliber 4 points ago +4 / -0

So when are the Americans liberating us? Wanna make sure the beer is cold when they arrive.

2
fortisetliber 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fair point, but I think property requirements to vote could also be a useful incentive to get on the property ladder. It may also encourage people to either move to, or at least buy property in, less expensive parts of the country.

So a tradesman could still rent his apartment in Fort Mac while owning a couple acres in the woods somewhere, which would give him the right to vote federally, as well as in the province and municipality where his land is located. I think owning real property has a psychological effects; you have more skin in the game in terms of how your society operates.

Not a perfect system by any stretch, but I think it's better than what we have now.

6
fortisetliber 6 points ago +6 / -0

WE NEED REAL PROPERTY REQUIREMENTS TO VOTE.

No more welfare migrants voting for more gimmees. No more moron uni students voting for their Marxist utopia. Oh, and if you and the Mrs. jointly own the ol' homestead, only one of you can be the designated elector for your property.

And don't worry, you only get 1 vote max per jurisdiction, so Mr. Yang with 20 investment properties in Vancouver doesn't get 20 votes; he gets one vote. The minimum property value required would depend on the jurisdiction, but I'm thinking $100 grand minimum federally. Provincial/municipal may need to be adjusted higher or lower accordingly.

Am I missing something, other than it never happening?

view more: Next ›