1
Anither 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why would American sources reflect "conservatism is rotting our country"?

Are you American and posting on a Canadian site?

Seems like you have a political agenda outside of the scope of this discussion and site. Try one of the many American based sites to spread your misinformation.

2
Anither 2 points ago +2 / -0

Isn't it funny that fires start in NGO controlled areas? I wonder why that is.?

In this day and age where cell phone/vehicle tracking could identify the culprets in 5 minutes, can it be the gov is uninterested as if they have no clue how it happened but we are going to lockdown our population "for their safety" as it works for the agenda?

The authorities have all the tools they need to identify the source. And it probably isn't climate change since it was raining there last week.

1
Anither 1 point ago +1 / -0

Didn't Justin sideways legalise bestiality in Canada by allowing courts to throw out convictions because the laws were antiquated? Did they ever fix this loophole? Why not?

https://www.vice.com/en/article/595q9z/bestiality-is-technically-not-illegal-in-canada-and-the-government-cant-say-when-theyll-fix-it

Seems to be fitting.

2
Anither 2 points ago +2 / -0

These leaked tapes came from disposition during Fox vs Dominion. Dominion is being accused of leaking them. This is against the settlement between Fox and Dominion which Fox has now indicated jeopardizes the settlement agreement.

https://www.mediaite.com/tv/just-in-fox-news-issues-warning-to-dominion-amid-tucker-carlson-leaks/

2
Anither 2 points ago +2 / -0

Whatever you do don't ask how they harvested the cells as it requires a living donor for kidney cells to be viable in the long term.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/HEK_293_cells

The sv40 sequence referenced in the Japanese study earlier this week is part of the unique cancer causing agent of this particular line of cells.

What a strange world we live in.

1
Anither 1 point ago +1 / -0

The IMF has had them shut down in slow mode for two years tanking the economy and slowing GDP drops to keep a Rosey picture for their IMF toadies like Trudeau's cabinet of stooges.

If a container isn't landed by the port, it doesn't count negatively against your GDP so everything looks okay financially. The stockpile at the Montreal ports is almost to the moon.

1
Anither 1 point ago +1 / -0

Try it on VPN. It knows your search history, but I'm on VPN and that is what i get.

4
Anither 4 points ago +4 / -0

The horrors of the future will be measured by this moment.

Ask if the children had informed consent or is that something only an adult can give?

Who is to blame, the souless practitioners or the guilesss consenttee? I think the argument would fall to those who were most informed in the risks and outcomes. They that sign the paper are to blame but the knowledge aspect weighs heavy and opens the door to malpractice.

1
Anither 1 point ago +1 / -0

You probably think this isn't Christian prosecution as well.

https://www.timesonline.com/story/news/local/2023/03/29/hopewell-high-school-under-lockdown-police-on-scene-beaver-county/70059868007/

Or this

https://nypost.com/2021/07/12/us-media-shamefully-justified-a-string-of-canadian-church-burnings/

Or this

https://tnc.news/2023/01/16/a-map-of-every-church-burnt-or-vandalized-since-the-residential-school-announcements/

Or this

https://www.wccbcharlotte.com/2023/03/30/how-swatting-calls-spread-as-schools-face-real-threats/

Or: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_Canadian_church_burnings

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau called the vandalism and arson attacks targeting Canadian churches "wrong and unacceptable",[25] while later adding that the anger directed towards the church was "fully understandable".[26]

I wonder if "fully understandable" was a signal to his followers that it was okay to burn the churches? Why would he say this?

Does it discount worshipers being terrorised and feeling safe in their house of worship any longer? 71 churches burned and no one cares. One homeless person was arrested and charged in Surrey. Sends a very accepting signal to their base that they won't be procecuted and therefore is effectively procecuting the Christian victims. And since people donate to the church every parisioner was victimized when their interest in the house of worship was destroyed.

2
Anither 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nope. I'm pointing out that other motives than the ones you are prematurely accepting are being investigated, and suggesting you wait till the facts come out instead of stating "it appears it is A-OK to persecute Christians"

You obvious think the shooter may have been justified. In my mind it doesn't matter what the motive was. You may be the most disgusting person that exists.

1
Anither 1 point ago +1 / -0

At this point it is just as possible that abusers were the target. You should moderate your accusations until you know more.

The shooter was a student more than ten years before. It's very likely no one they knew was at the school. The shooter has a manifesto.

So once again you are apologising for the perpetrator and blaming the victim.

You live in an intellectual fantasy world. There are three children who won't have lives to live.

Two wrongs don't make a right.

You skipped the question about First Nations in Canada.

You tried to change the goal post again so unless you want to create a new thread to expand on your beliefs regarding the first Nations I'm not sure what it has to do with anything.

3
Anither 3 points ago +3 / -0

Liberal policy says we now need to ban knives as i understand it.

We cannot address the perpetrators violence.

1
Anither 1 point ago +1 / -0

Germans voted in the National Socialists in a majority. That means that those that voted for them were in agreement with their policies.

I don't use "Nazi" as a term just like i don't use "Goat Herder" - they are both slurs.

The Germans own their support of their government policies.

Trying to say these policy supporters didn't include people who went on after the government changed is a lie. The people who were complicit simply crawled back into the woodwork of life and for the next 70 years were hunted down. It's not possible to catch them all but it was tried. Some hid in plain sight because they were powerful or valuable.

So once again i feel like you are trying to apologize for the ones who hid. Do you feel some camraderie in some way with their behaviour? Why?

Settle down. It's a discussion, not a pogrom.

And yet based on the same mentality how many churches were burned two years ago and now a school where 3 children died is fresh in the news; neither being declared a terrorist hate crime so it appears it is A-OK to persecute Christians.

Is it a dangerous precedent to establish in the minds of people that Christians are fair game? Are you sure you wish to agree with it?

Is this why the culprits of the church fires were never brought to justice? Is it our leaders feel that Christians somehow deserve being persecuted?

I feel like you are trying to deminish the seriousness of harboring hate for a religious group.

1
Anither 1 point ago +1 / -0

In answer to your persisting i found the reference.

One of the unusual things about the book of Revelation is that it is the only book in the Bible that contains a promise to everyone that reads it, and all that hear it will be abundantly blessed. The early church read the book of Revelation in its entirety every time they met. There is a curse spoken at the end of Revelation to anyone who tampers with the contents of the Bible.

https://discoverrevelation.com/revelation-chapter-1/

In my interpretation "early church" is defined as the period prior to Europe conversion en mass around AD1000.

2
Anither 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've answered that question on 900 years at this point you need to disprove what i said or accept it. It's my belief. I read of it so it's true to me.

You apologise for the German governments medical policies during the second world war period and are trying to distance their complicity in those policies by pretending that "those policies were from the Nazis" like it was done in isolation and not implemented nationwide. Is your position that it was okay to protect those medical professionals that blindly followed orders during that time as not culpable in some way? Did they not posses free will? Do you like the policies? You never answered my question; were the policies to force medical procedures, tattoo identies on the arms and base the ability to function in society on a health pass not evil?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1297275/

What is it called when you discriminated against the religious beliefs of a person or group by using slurs to discredit their beliefs as you "set the goalpost" in the beginning? It's obvious you feel it's okay to discriminate against Christians and subtly against Jews. When you do a google search of "goat herder" do you know what comes up? Sure you do. One of the associated slurs is "goat [expletive]". It's common that when using "goat herder" it is to imply the second term.

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Goat%20Herder

Jews were well known in the time of the Bible to be strongly "goat herders" and proudly such. But few goat herders were educated enough to be scholars or academics who would have been able to capture the words in any great form and more importantly protect those words from destruction. By using slurs to try to diminish the value of the work or to discredit the people who follow the text you show your true beliefs. There is no proof that John was a goat herder. But he could read and write which at the time no goat herder could do.

https://evidenceforchristianity.org/were-people-literate-in-the-time-of-jesus-r/

If literacy at the time of Jesus was around 3% then those like John that could write letters and collect thoughts were highly treasured assets and would have been protected. No "goat herder".

So by using those terms what was your intention? Is it directed hate toward adherents to the Christian faith that drives you or some other reason you posted this misinformation?

You obviously just repeated hate you heard before like it was true.

What is the intention of Revelation? Here's some detail:

The theme of Revelation is the revelation of the person and the prophetic program of Jesus Christ. Many purposes can be detected in the book.

First, it was written to encourage believers to endure persecution and to persevere through suffering, knowing that the victory of Christ over the world and the Devil is guaranteed and certain.

Second, the book was written to show how all of prophecy focuses on Jesus Christ, His person and His program for the world.

Third, the book seeks to unite all the various lines of biblical prophecy (both Old and New Testaments), and to show how they converge upon the second coming of Christ to rule the earth in His messianic kingdom.

Fourth, the book seeks to correct some moral and doctrinal problems that existed (and still exist), in the churches, and to instruct Christians in such things as salvation, prophecy, the person of Christ, and Christian living.

And finally, the book may be an attack of the paganism and emperor worship of the Roman Empire, particularly against the emperor Domitian and his persecution of Christians. (There are many possible veiled references to the anti-Christian nature and activities of Rome in the book).


So to your question:

What makes you so sure the Book of Revelation is talking about our current era, given that the claim has been wrong before?

You offer no proof that the "claim has been wrong before". On what basis? The Bible can be considered witness and warning to future generations and as such is the most treasured tome in history.

Literal interpretation of the Bible is wrong and hateful. Everyone who cherry picks a line or discredit the authors of the Bible with bad intentions are spreading misinformation and potentially inciting hate. It's a form of Christian persecution.

5
Anither 5 points ago +5 / -0

Racists always try to deflect from their own words.

Once again, is 'goat herders' you wrote in reference to the Jews who wrote the Bible some reference to a slur? Seems like you want to avoid discussing your own hate terms in depth.

4
Anither 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think you invoked Godwin's law. Did the Germans and Nazi's suddenly switch or are you a German apologist?

With regards to your initial statement that:

Cause those old goat herders off the coast of what is now Türkiye knew what was going to be happening over 1900 years later, eh folks? When he said "I am coming soon" he meant almost two thousand years later, for sure.

So could you explain your statement that the Bible was written by "goat herders" isn't a form of slur? Just wondering if you based that statement from something you read or you have a source that isnt trying to offend? Or do you just want to discredit Christians generally because you harbour some hate for them?

2
Anither 2 points ago +2 / -0

Revelation is the only book of the Bible that pronounces a blessing upon the reader on completion. When John passed his book on he shared a great gift with mankind. The church would read it to the members to bless them.

The 900 year reference was from what I read many years ago so in our modern world there are other blessings to be found I'm sure. You would be blessed for reading it.

The parables of Revelation have repeated many times in history just not in such easy soundbites as you favour - the gesundheit pass ("show me your papers") was an example of medicalized tyrrany that echos the parables of Revelation. The Germans in the past used a typhus pretext to subjugate and imprison millions and create an industry of death around medicine as a way to control the masses.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1297275/

I think you would agree that the geshuntiet pass was evil; it can be regarded as the mark of the beast in pure form.

4
Anither 4 points ago +4 / -0

The parables are as true today as they were in 90 AD..

Generally speaking if you refer to the Bible as meant to be interpreted literally you are taking a low IQ perception of it.

When John (not a goat herder) was exciled he had a vision that gave him an ability to see the patterns that would lead to Revelation and the Apocalypse.

He wrote to warn the churches he used to represent in Turkey that they needed to adjust their behaviours to ensure the church survived.

In his vision he was in excile so no part of his message could carry any reference to the actual state of affairs of the day so he wrote his instructions in Revelation.

There was for almost 900 years only one text read in all Christian churches from John's time forward. And that is Revelation. It was revealed in its entirety every Sunday to ensure that the flock could identify when tyrants would attempt to subjugate the masses.

You should read it and learn something.

2
Anither 2 points ago +2 / -0

There used to be a measure of job quality to determine the addition of 1 million souls was justified.

I doubt the gov created housing for 1million people in the last year and they claim their policies don't create inflation.

2
Anither 2 points ago +2 / -0

"you will be happy" is a command not an observation.

7
Anither 7 points ago +7 / -0

I wonder how many of these are presumed deaths vs confirmed deaths? A doctor can just say they died of or with COVID if they feel it's possible.

I wonder how many died at home of COVID? Seems like that would be a large number in a pandemic.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›