Harper doesn't get off scott free either. He doesn't have a perfect record. Saying that, making a 'plan' and implementing it are 2 different things. Mr. Trudeau did not have to activate said plan, not cimpletely and beyond.
Now my company cannot send our salesmen to the US to see their clients. We cant get new people a lot of the time because the college leavers arent coming in for interviews, they get paid with printed money I guess.
Sure a lot of it we can do over the phone or video call, but it isnt the same. Logistics have also gone down the pan. Our logistics fuel costs are crippling. We can't get stuff over the border each way because our carriers truckers are either quitting (jabby mandates) or parking rigs because diesel is crippling.
At the moment, our HQ in the states is currently cut off from our HQ in Canada. We have had plenty staff take 1 or 2 jabs. Some have had a 3rd. Some had it by chance caught naturally and some declined. Theres enough of them that havent had 3 or nat immunity in each HQ or those that dont want it to affect our profitability because we cant move or trade freely.
Very, very frustrating. Many US staff can't come to us, and many Canadian staff can't travel south, because Biden wants jabby or no entry, and Trudeau wants jabby or no entry. Absolute deadlock.
We couldnt have a staff christmas party in AB or BC this year because of the jabby papers. We can't have conferences or business meetings in different cities because good luck a hotel renting you a ballroom. We have to meet clients or have stealth conferences with large groups in hotel lobbies, smaller groups in coffee shops, minivans, even using our homes! Oh but Bonnie Henry and Kenney says we cant have people over that we dont know in our own damn houses. Absurd we have to sneak rent a big hotel room that opens thru to another, bringing lots of chairs and a projector. Our staff in Quebec can't even walk around in peace after dark or carry on business between clients without hassle from the authorities. Absolutely ridiculous the hoops we have to go through just to carry on a business!!
We have had to raise raw material prices 3 times in the last year alone.
I could go on but omegacanada probably gets the drift.
I could not find specific data on SARS2 differentiation or mentions of detection so I withdraw that claim.
CDC said that after December 31, 2021, it will withdraw the request to the U.S. FDA for EUA of the Real-Time RT-PCR. The test came out in Feb 20 to detect the SARS-CoV-2 only.
quote: "In preparation for this change, CDC recommends clinical laboratories and testing sites that have been using the CDC 2019-nCoV RT-PCR assay select and begin their transition to another FDA-authorized COVID-19 test. CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses. (italics for emphasis) Such assays can facilitate continued testing for both influenza and SARS-CoV-2..."
The CDC update appeara to be about a specific CDC-developed PCR test to detect genetic material from a particular organism. The agency is stressing the need for multiple tests,(multiplex suggests this) which can look for both the coronavirus and flu at the same time. This offers a chance to do flu monitoring and identify flu while testing for SARS-CoV-2. It appears if the SARS-CoV-2-only test found only that corona, and if that was the only test done, then flu infections went undetected. The “flu season” impact is clear to anyone interested in looking at the data.
So really, I should rephrase my original claim to say "PCR test could not differentiate between flu and sars2 as the teting could not detect the flu".
That is, casting our minds back to the odd disappearance of the flu last winter, plus flu death rates were significantly lower throughout 2020 than previous years. If the 'old' PCR test could not, detect, or differentiate between flu and sars2, or maybe the test was inconclusive, and the patient presented with flu/sars2 like symptoms (which have some crossover) then how many of them with the flu were just assumed to have covid? We don't know. All we know is that flu inexplicably nigh on 'disappeared' winter 2020.
Some would say "oh its masks and the plexiglass and people sitting at home" blah blah, but should we be so sure? After all, flu isn't a cakewalk either for the oldest and most frail, old timers comorbidities can and do die of the flu as well as covid.
Moreover, why they didn't think of this before and had the PCR be able to detect and differentiate between flu, and all the coronavirus and rhinovirus from the get go?
How many people tested inconclusive or negative, and had heavy colds or flus and the covid box was ticked anyway? I recall BC Gesundheitfuhrer, Bonnie Henry basically saying that some cases would be assumed. Ill try and find video of her saying that.
I don't follow this Adams fella anyway, I don't care for his products or his sites, and I don't claim that Adams is right or wrong about anything. If he provides data thats useful, fine, if it leads nowhere, well more fool on him.
William Ray, havent heard of him before I found the site, but you said: "he appears to be supporting a citizen's right to say anything he wants to in a public forum, but apparently anything the government does to try to suppress harmful bullshit public speech is worth going to war for: "We are at war it is time we act like it.".
Supporting a citizens right to say anything he likes in a public forum? I have no problem with that, excepting libel/slander, incitement, uttering threats to kill/harm etc. Anything else is fair game. Especially so directed at government, 1st amendment and all. I cant get inside his head, but one would assume he means this.
To other citizens? No problem with that no. There is no such thing as 'hate' speech. There is just speech. 'Hating' someone is not a crime. Saying hateful things to them (sans the above) is not and should not be a crime.
If someone wants to go up to someone in the street and say every insult and slur to them under the sun? Fine. Wether it caucasian, black, oriental, south asian. Have at it. Obviously thats an asshole thing to do, but stick and stones and all that.
The line is crossed on application of force against a person or saying one of the above things like libel. Plenty things have been said even in comedy that are offensive to at least 1 person.
As for Ronnie, gain never heard of him until I found the site, you posit: "what's wrong with giving "young people the resources to challenge violent extremism in all its forms"? "
Well, nothing, on it's face. One would have to see these 'resources'. Why are we giving young people 'resources' for this? This is the job of the Police, RCMP, FBI, CIA etc. If...we assume 'extremeism' is things like Radical Islamic terrorism, Far left riots (Antifa), Far right activity such as the KKK (who are basically non existent at this point). Who else?
Irish mafia/terrorism? IRA? Been underground for decades.
I would imagine that 'young people' have better things to occupy themselves with than 'challenging violent extremism'. I'm not so young anymore and sure as heck me or my children would stay out of that. Call 911 and let the experts handle it. If my children come home complaining that Johnny or Jane called them a so and so today or X was saying ist or ism things to someone I say suck it up, people have been saying insults and slurs since the ancients to each other. If they complain they got hit? Next time they hit back.
By young people 'challenging' this, how? Going up to the manchester arena islamic suicide bomber in Manchester and 'havnig a word'? Trying to talk down that nutter that shot up that black church a few years back? Young people using their cars to box in those islamic nutters fleeing from the cops in California resulting in a shootout a few years back?
Or, more likely, is it 'challenging' people saying mean things to them or online. One would assume all the 'ist's' and 'isms'.
This IDS would be better off encouraging young people to go into the armed forces, or trades or learn practical skills, or giving them career advice on getting into the work force ASAP, growing a thick skin and toughening up, instead of telling kids to march around protesting this or that. Kids filling their heads currently with useless degrees like left handed puppetry or German Polka studies and racking up 10s of thousands of dollars in debt.
Those years spent doing that they could be in work learning way more about the human condition than wasting time on non STEM degrees.
Yes, elective surgeries. Now maybe "cases" of the unjabbed are, maybe they arent clogging up hospitals, we would have to look at the total number of beds occupied, the ages in average of the patients etc.
Drop all restrictions yes. We are at 90-95% jabbed in practicality (minus children, people who already had it and recovered, citizens not in canada right now etc). Any jab requirement aren't required at this point. Were at almost 90%, saturation point is here or close to it. The CDC data here ( https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#rates-by-vaccine-status ) shows markedly dropping deaths from a very low probability of death. We have already protected the most vulnerable, 70+ by offering them choice of the jab.
No, that would be a terrible thing to say. Every child's death is tragic. Death is part of existence. All we can do is try and ensure the next generation survive us.
According to CDC latest data ( https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#rates-by-vaccine-status ) the death rate for children up to 17 for jabbed or non jabbed is vanishingly small. 0.02 or, of the "cases" on that data set, 0.00001% died. Nobody wan'ts children to die, however at that rate, they have a higher chance of contracting many other childhood, more common conditions/diseases.
Thank you for the CDC data. This is a very handy chart. I'm pleased to see that the case and death rates have dropped a lot, in aggregate, and all age cohorts. This is tremendous good news for society, it seems this is behind us now. This would seem logical, considering we are at or approaching saturation point for jabby rollout.
Let's break down the data dear metacanada forum: Flipping the chart to 'deaths per 100K' from "cases" at it's peak in aggregate - Aug 21/21. Non jabby 13.92 vs jabbed 1.03, a large difference in death rate of 14x.
Oct 30 21, Last date avail- 4.98 vs. 0.38 A big drop.
Next up, the least likely to die, & the most, children up to 17, and elderly 80+. Children peak, sept 11, 2021 (odd coincidence on the date) 0.44 non jab, 0 jabbed. Oct 30th, 0.02 non jab, and oddly jabbed exactly the same risk of dying 0.02. (why the rise? Why bother getting jabby at all?)
80+ Peak Aug 21, non jabby 64.88 vs jabbed 13.43 30th oct latest, non jabby 28.7 vs jabbed 5.3
The rates of death per 100K has fallen a lot since peak on the non jabby, one can only speculate as to why, for eg, natural herd immunity incidnce being larger, the evolution of the pathogen being driven to a less virulent mutation (apparently omicron being nigh on harmless according to South African docs), or perhaps growing pre hospitalisation intervention through the use of doctor supervised Ivermectin, HCQ, Budesinide, or even patient OTC self administration of anti histamines such as Bendryl or Periactin. The charts do not appear to have a way to factor in recorded average comorbidity or the deaths. The charts don't go back to 2020, so perhaps the CFR/IFR was higher and probability of death was higher.
Pulling back to a 35,000ft view in perspective of what the charts really mean, and putting it into a more probability relateable slant. IOW, based on who's died at what rate before, How likely are YOU going to die from this?
Aggregate peak Aug 21/21 on average, non jabby 0.01% died vs jabby, 0.001%. 99.98% survived non jab, vs 99.998%. So, 10x the probability of dying. However, when survival is already at 99.98% Id wager many would shrug and take their chances, especially if they are a younger cohort.
At that probability, even at peak, people have a nearly 10x higher chance of dying of septicemia, 0.9%. ( https://discovertheodds.com/what-are-the-odds-of-dying-of/ )
But lets go nuts, and say, for arguments sake that everyone has the same chance of dying as our most senior cohort sans pokey. At peak even. 0.06%, 99.94% survived.
Turning to the latest numbers from the CDC, the news is even more optimistic- 30th Oct in aggregate, non jab 0.004% 99.996% Survived, jabbed 0.0003% 99.9997% survived.
Now to the least risk group, although at this point, saying 'risk' seems a bit silly- Children up to 17, non jab 0.00001% chance of dying, vs jab, the exact same chance or a 99.99998% chance of surviving. I posit we can safely say, those are great odds for the kids.
Everyone else no matter what age is going to be somewhere in the middle.
2022, and after 2 long years, it's over. Thank god. Now isn't that something to be happy about in the new year folks? Cheers! Ill raise a glass to that.
"(Originally published in Icelandic in Morgunbladid on January 8th. 2022)
After December 20th., the 14-day incidence of Covid-19 infection by vaccination status took a very unexpected turn in Iceland. The infection rate per 100,000 of fully vaccinated adults with booster is now eleven times higher than on December 20th, and the infection rate of double-vaccinated adults seven times higher. At the same time, infections among unvaccinated people have grown by a factor of 2.6 only. Among children, we see a similar change; a tenfold increase among the fully vaccinated while the rate among the unvaccinated is 2.4 times higher than on December 20th.
This change can hardly be explained away by changes in behavior, such a sudden and decisive change of behavior between groups is impossible. It is also unlikely that testing has suddenly increased this sharply among some groups and not others. We know the protection against infection from vaccination wanes rapidly, but it is out of the question that it should drop so suddenly. The most likely explanation is the new omicron variant. Foreign data also indicate that the currently available vaccines have little or no effect against omicron-infection.
The data published on covid.is are weighted, the different size of the groups is adjusted for. This means we can use them to conclude on probability of infection. At present, triple-vaccinated people are only 30% less likely to get infected than unvaccinated adults, and for vaccinated children the difference is only 15%. This small difference decreases rapidly in both groups. The biggest news, however, is that double-vaccinated people are now 90% more likely to get infected than the unvaccinated. This suggests that the protection provided by two doses of vaccine is in fact less than none, it is the opposite.
(After this article was published in Morgunbladid, the main national newspaper of Iceland on January 8th the Icelandic chief-epidemologist has tried to explain this away by claiming the number of unvaccinated people is overestimated in the data. The problem is that if this was the fact they would have had to overestimate this figure by 90% to get the rate for the double-vaccinated down to the level of the unvaccinated. This is very unlikely for official data, published daily for over six months and quoted by the responsible officials at least weekly. A 5-10% error might be tolerable, but it would only bring the difference down to 70-80% instead of 90%.)"
More context: "In the UKHSA Vaccine Surveillance report this week, as unadjusted vaccine effectiveness against infection (calculated from the raw data) plummets across all age groups in the month ending January 2nd 2022. The revival in some age groups from the third doses has now been almost completely cancelled out, as all age groups above 18 years go negative again. Those in their 40s hit a new low of minus-151% (negative vaccine effectiveness means the vaccinated are more likely to be infected than the unvaccinated; a vaccine effectiveness of minus-100% means the vaccinated are twice as likely to be infected as the unvaccinated). There is a sharp drop for under-18s for the first time as well, with unadjusted vaccine effectiveness more than halving in a fortnight, collapsing from 79% to 38% (there was no report last week due to the Christmas holiday).
...72% or nearly three quarters of infections in that four-week period were in the vaccinated (65% in the double or triple vaccinated) and only 22% in the unvaccinated. That is certainly not an epidemic of the unvaccinated; almost the opposite, in fact.
Omicron has also had an impact on unadjusted vaccine effectiveness against hospitalisation, with sharp declines occurring particularly in the younger age groups with lower booster coverage. The decline in 18-29 year-olds is particularly steep, dropping to just 50%, meaning double vaccination is only halving the risk of hospitalisation (though keep in mind this is unadjusted vaccine effectiveness based on raw data, not taking into account any potential confounders in either direction).
Unadjusted vaccine effectiveness against death remains high, above 80% for all ages, though there is sign of a slight decline." (Source: https://dailysceptic.org/2022/01/07/vaccine-effectiveness-plummets-to-as-low-as-minus-151-as-omicron-cancels-out-boost-from-third-doses/ )
As for the last sentence, unadjusted effevtiveness against death, well, if one is debating about a medical drug preventing death over a pathogen with a survival rate of at least 99.5% in those with no comorbidities under 70, to get that last few hundredths of a percent advantage getting the jab, then really you have too much to worry about.
Now this is interesting. Granted, Adams can be a bit of a grifter sometimes, a militant vegan, and his presentation can be sensationalist, but what matters is the 3rd party references and data provided. Are they true, or not? It depends, largely on the story.
ISD though? I had a quick dig and 'followed the money'.
I wasn't entirely surprised to find that it's founders, partners, associates include Geroge Soros, Bill & Melinda Gates, John Hopkins University, the ADL (real nice people there hey), Global Affairs Canada, The MCCain Institute (Yes, THAT RINO McCain), Public Safety Canada.
The rest of it is a whos who of globalist orgs, as well as BIg Tech. One would be forgiven for speculating that it's a large, well funded, globalist digital propaganda mouthpiece in the vein of Orwells 'Ministry of Truth'. But that would be assuming wouldn't it. So maybe ill leave it up to the forum to decide.
The Rt. "Honourable" First Lord of The Treasury, Mr. Trudeau's gov, has also used their er....."services".
Direct quote from ISD's 'brochure' - " We have trained over 32,000 activists and social influencers around the world, and have pioneered first of their kind intervention models across different online spaces – gaming, social media, alt-tech platforms – reaching over 100 million targeted users online to date. Our policy and community networks make ISD uniquely equipped to scale proven solutions and programmes. Advisory and policy: We formulate and advocate policy solutions, and provide local authorities, central governments and multilateral institutions with the data, expertise and technical support to deliver evidence-based policy and programming. ISD has provided policy support and training to over 40 governments and 150 cities worldwide. We launched the Strong Cities Network..."
And:
"ISD has spearheaded and led inter-governmental initiatives in the domains of counter-extremism and digital regulation."
Digital....regulation. An army of 32,000 activists & influencers? Who knows, maybe some of them lurk on the .win network...
Sources: A bit amateurish looking but data is data. https://stormhaven.blog/2021/07/21/trudeau-off-shoring-censorship-of-canadians-meet-your-new-ministry-of-truth/
I wonder what data is behind these deaths? The cause, apparent treatments etc before the deaths? This is in the last year, correct? Hmmm. Strange. 2020 was the year of the rona pandemic with no jabby, and 2021 was the year they got a whole lot of folks jabbied.
One would think that the rona being not tackled in 2020 would result in more deaths than 2021, but its the opposite even as jabby percentages grow.
How odd. Investigations must be made.
SARS-nCov-1 was a typo. I fixed it to 2.
Hmmm yes Omicron is an interesting development. Apparently there is also already another 'edition' HVU (HMU?) or somesuch.
Wether taking another (identical) shot to the first 3 will stave off omicron, depends on if it's even worth bothering with, that is, what data is there on the virulence and of that, resulting in a high IFR/CFR of omicron?
It's already been stated in the mainstream that omicron appears to have very low pathogenicity - referring to the proportion of alleged infected people - determined apparently by the PCR test or other methods being "positive" - who then develop clinical symptoms of the disease, of whatever severity.
Because a "positive" test apparently now is a "Case" irrespectivley as to if that person even 'feels' ill or not.
We are already in the 1.25% IFR rate, (Derived from data from previous versions, the Indian/Delta one being allegedly more virulent) and mostly elderly with comorbidities die with it, so if anyone who proposes the jab method, I posit we should be offering jabs to the alleged most vulnerable- that is, persons above 70/75.
And if they refuse it, let it be.
If it turns out that the virulence of omicron is even lower, to get us a lower IFR than 1.25% then that is surely good news, no? So far, it appears that omicron has very low virulence, that is, persons with clinical disease who become severely ill or die, as a sole cause, with no comorbidities.
I could not find any obvious internet search references to anyone worldwide dying entirely from omicron, however 1 person in the UK has died with it. (as of As of 13th dec 2021) I could not on superficial digging find the age & comorbidities of that person. If anyone has any data on deaths purely of people dying from omicron as the only cause with zero comorbidities, <70, worldwide, that would be great.
Now that you mentioned SARS1, that raises the Q about why a vaccine never came to market for that one, odd considering its 11% CFR. I do recall in the media at the time a big fuss was made about SARS1 at the time. But yet, one was developed for it's cousin, SARS2, even though the pathogenicity of the virus is a fraction of 1.
Ultimately, Canada is nearing 90% jabbed, higher if we exclude those who have already got natural innoculation & immunity by previously getting & recovering from the China variant/Alpha, the Oxford/Beta, Indian/delta, or South African/Omicron etc, under 10yrs, persons away from Canada for long streches, citizens who are ex pats etc).
The situation is as good as it's going to get.
Moreover on the turn off the TV thing.
I cannot stress enough that this is the key to staying sane throughout all this nonsense. I cut cable/sat over 10 years ago (with ocassional cavings for a few months here and there) and it makes such a difference.
Cut off the ability to flip through all the fear porn and life becomes normal, happy! The channels are doom & gloom, yet outside in the fresh air, the birds are singing, the sun is shining. I posit the most brainwashed mask karens and branch cult Covidians, are proportional to the plotline of the most hours watched of the visual diahhrea that is CBC/CTV24 TV news.
Once one has taken the Red Pill, you understand how the media works, how it lies, smears, distorts, editorialises, warps, propagandises, watching or reading turns into observing. One can now see the BS coming a mile off. I'ts alternately bemusing, almost comical.
I don't read in depth any of the dinosaur media newspapers, websites, or watch their channels. No CTV, CBC, CFCN, Global, CIty, 660, 770CHQR, no nat post, star, globe & mail.
Exceptions are made when trying to find data, or to keep tabs on what the cute little 'plans' of those in power (esp the Gesundheitfuhrers Dr. Bonnie Henry, Mr. Tam) are up to, foreshadowing, policy baloons etc.
The dinosaur media has not been 'fit for purpose' for decades. Only time I see it is when flipping thru the channels in a hotel room. It's become a standing joke now that one can just wait for a min or 2, sometimes seconds before a 'we all gon dieeeeee' or some hard left propaganda story comes on. Insufferable.
Can you give us some examples please.
to "H E L P".
DrEvilAirQuoteFingersMeme.jpeg.
"Help".
Ahuh.
Junk product anyway. Pure sugar syrup/or HFCS crap. Better off buying organic real maple sryup from Canada or USA.
Oh, also I noticed this week in Stupidstore (Loblaws) no more 'Uncle Ben's' rice. Now it's just 'Ben's Rice'.
Well nuts to them. I will continue to call the rice uncle bens and aunt jemima, aunt phuqin jemima.
How absurd. I liked Uncle ben and his smiling face on the packet. He always looked like a cool southern states fella to me that would have interesting war yarns about Nam or something and have a pint with. Him being black wasn't really something that was relevant. No idea if he was real.
Hard lefties ruin everything. Suck all the fun and joy out of life.
Is it just me or do I see duplicates of some posts right under each other? This one has 3. Bug?
"PAY NO ATTENTION TO THE MAN BEHIND THE CURTAIN!!!" - REEEEEuters. Probly. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWyCCJ6B2WE <- wizard of oz.
Reuters got SJW 'skinsuited' a long time ago.
Bought & paid for with a compromise file no doubt.
Data updated 30/12/21. About halfway down under - "Summary of findings".
Biden is continuing to push mass jabs for children, despite the fact that 0.00-0.02 percent of child WuFlu cases result in death.
“The FDA has now authorized booster shots for children ages 12 to 15. Vaccinating our children is the best way to protect them from the Omicron variant,” Biden proclaimed on Friday via Twatter.
However, according to data from the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), last updatedDecember 30, 2021, the CCP Virus mortality rate among children remains extremely low.
This underlines the concept of giving these experimental rushed to marked infusions to children, with no long term data on human affect, morally dubious - of that dubiousness getting more so the younger the child- and at worst, reprehensible.
Moreover, for the jab 'completists' - for this reason it may be practically impossible for 100% jab rate in Canada. We are at 90% already. Minus the pop under 18, how many left? We are, for all practical purposes - fully jabbed in Canada.
Enough. Let's get back to work and back to normal.
The very concept that 'bad white man' "stole" the land from an assortment of indians is a stretch, to say the least.
Look at the data. Around the time that the euros (and even earlier the viking explorers) encountered the Red Indians they numbered around 700k, spread over a huge landmass that is north america. What is that....a 3% occupancy rate? (not including the Eskimos here)
As far as I know, the indians were found:
- At stone age level. No established governments, no permanent infrastructure, economies, no written language, no plough, no mechanised farming. Was this their 'fault'? I don't know, they were essentially isolated once the ice bringe melted.
- Constant warring and fighting and killing each other.
- No established system of property governance, or legal claims via an established judicial system.
- Still living in glorified tents, meanwhile hundreds of years earlier the romans had built this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pantheon,_Rome it still stands today. Granted, the indians were good at building rope bridges, which the euros were leery of crossing. I may be wrong but I dont beleive there was much else.
If any of the above is inaccurate please let me know.
So how can a claim of 'land back' be levelled at people who encountered a land with an occupancy rate of at best, 5%?
Saying that, fine. If the indians really want the horrible caucasian man out of "their" land I have no problem of giving them back the entire landmass of Canada, on the provision that it would be very unfair of us to bugger off without removing all traces of our opression, lets restore the land to the original sacred untouched level so they can have it as we found it, and then they can do what they will with it.
Id imagine the removal of every last brick, power station, cell tower, and bolt of infrastructure that "we" mostly built (with the help of the chinese with the railway) would take many billions of dollars to achieve to get it back to basically grassland and praries, but hey, think of the unspoilt land just like it was when we first came upon you in furs and animal skins. It will be like old times again!
Oh also you dont get the horses. They were introduced by the spanish. Sorry!
All the millions you make on the casinos will at least offset the labour bill. You can even help out!
What's that? No offers? Anyone? Hellooo?
Many, not all - teachers have turned into the most entitled, laziest motherphuqqers ive seen for a long time.
Imagine, any other private sector employee trying this- getting paid and wanting to sit on your ass.
GET BACK TO WORK YOU LAZY PHUCKS
Unclean! Unclean! REEEEEEEEE etc.
Another possibility.....are the manifestations of 'infection' in the jabbed, just the jabby having it's designed effect?
Wouldnt surprise me.
Well folks, we already had the Fauci emails, pried out of the NIH's reluctant claws using FOIA and IIRC dragging through a court.
Those were, 'illuminating', to put it mildly.
I wonder what things will be unearthed come Monday? Has Fauci been a naughty boy?
Going from prior scoops PV has had, I'm going to wager, that yes, very....very naughty.