1
Ham_Sandwich77 1 point ago +1 / -0

You've got the wrong section. That's sections 5 (tricking someone into going aboard under false pretense and then putting them into military service with a hostile power when they get there).

You want section 4:

Any person who, being a Canadian national, leaves or goes on board any conveyance with a view to leaving Canada with intent to accept any commission or engagement in the armed forces of any foreign state at war with any friendly foreign state or, whether a Canadian national or not, within Canada, induces any other person to leave or go on board any conveyance with a view to leaving Canada, with a like intent, is guilty of an offence.

Key language in there is: "engagement in the armed forces of any foreign state at war with any friendly foreign state"

In plain English: It's ok as long as you're not joining the armed forces of Canada's enemies, or the enemies of Canada's allies. Ukraine is Canada's ally, so you're legally ok to join their army.

4
Ham_Sandwich77 4 points ago +4 / -0

"The deal is valued at roughly $14.2 billion USD"

So they're paying 14 billion for 88 planes?

😳

2
Ham_Sandwich77 2 points ago +2 / -0

My previous position on vaccines was "Do whatever you want, it's a personal choice".

Now I'm begging people to stop pumping their bodies full of that shit.

2
Ham_Sandwich77 2 points ago +2 / -0

Really. Do they come out of laboratories every hundred years?

3
Ham_Sandwich77 3 points ago +3 / -0

Is it a coincidence that the people encouraging young boys to cut their penises off are the same people encouraging you jab yourself repeatedly with an untested "vaccine"?

I think not.

2
Ham_Sandwich77 2 points ago +2 / -0

Are you fucking retarded? Top of the screen in big white letters:

"March 2020: Dr. Anthony Fauci talks with Dr Jon LaPook about Covid-19."

Here's 60 minutes themselves later acknowledging Fauci's original mask comments and pathetically trying to rationalize or explain them away after the mask issue became politicized: https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=965812513924726

1
Ham_Sandwich77 1 point ago +1 / -0

Epic crossover: Blackface meets womanface!

2
Ham_Sandwich77 2 points ago +2 / -0

And all just because Trump said it worked, and they didn't want to let him be right about something.

Pure evil.

3
Ham_Sandwich77 3 points ago +3 / -0

Oh of course, how silly of me.

Also just in time for US midterm elections!

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-62959089

How fortunate for the Democrats that they can report to the electorate that they "ended" covid just before voters got o the polls.

3
Ham_Sandwich77 3 points ago +3 / -0

What science changed in those 7 months to warrant the change?

Absolutely nothing. The timing of the mandate cancelation (immediately after a vocally anti-mandate politician won the CPC leadership, putting the CPC ahead in the polls) proves that this always political, not scientific.

1
Ham_Sandwich77 1 point ago +1 / -0

Literally you.

Just count yourself lucky that the moderator here disagrees with your totalitarian "Anyone who disagrees with me must be censored!" philosophy. Because that's what your "Don't tolerate the intolerant" philosophy is really about. We weren't born yesterday. You leftists have been doing this since forever.

1
Ham_Sandwich77 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, "we" as in the users (and in my case, the moderator) of this board. You've just:

A) Stated we shouldn't tolerate the intolerant and...
B) Declared yourself "intolerant".

So, now what?

3
Ham_Sandwich77 3 points ago +3 / -0

Poilievre isn't even prime minister yet and he's already dictating federal border policy.

1
Ham_Sandwich77 1 point ago +2 / -1

That MacKenzie guy is pretty dumb. Being a PPC supporters, MAcKenzie went to a Poilievre event and got photographed shaking hands with him in a deliberate effort to besmirch Poilievre's name (what does that say about you when all you have to do to make someone look bad is associate yourself with him?).

Then he hands Poilievre this rape threat on a silver platter, meaning PP can now show the world he's not on the same team as Mackenzie.

Well played MacKenzie. Well played. <golf clap>.

1
Ham_Sandwich77 1 point ago +1 / -0

That MacKenzie guy is pretty dumb. Being a PPC supporters, MAcKenzie went to a Poilievre event and got photographed shaking hands with him in a deliberate effort to besmirch Poilievre's name (what does that say about you when all you have to do to make someone look bad is associate yourself with him?).

Then he hands Poilievre this rape threat on a silver platter, meaning PP can now show the world he's not on the same team as Mackenzie.

Well played MacKenzie. Well played. <golf clap>.

2
Ham_Sandwich77 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah it's known fact that minor parties usually overpoll because a segment of the minor party's supporters will to tell a pollster they're voting for the minor party, but then come to their senses in the polling booth and decide at the last minute not to throw their votes away.

The PPC's polling average the day before the 2019 election was 3.0%. They ended up with 1.6% of the actual vote.

The PPC's polling average the day before the 2021 election was 7.0%. They ended up with 3.3% of the actual vote.

So with weak CPC leaders like Scheer and O'Toole, you could expect the PPC's actual results to be about half of what their polling numbers predicted.

I imagine they'll get even a smaller ratio with PP as leader.

view more: Next ›