0
RightOfSask 0 points ago +1 / -1

SOMEHOW SURVIVED easily, only treated at a hospital with NO Hospitalization, ICU or other additional Medical Attention required. Nanna kicked the false Covid narrative in the ass and and continued on truckin

Literally the first sentence in the article you linked:

"A 90-year-old Belgian woman who died from COVID-19 in March had contracted two variants of coronavirus at the same time, which is believed to be the first documented case of its kind, a scientific congress and Belgian media said on Sunday."

She didn't survive it.

21
RightOfSask 21 points ago +22 / -1

If this kind of anti-Canadian, radical far-left curriculum is being pushed by a ‘conservative’ government in Ontario, we have to ask “what the hell is the point of ‘conservative’ parties if all they do is betray their own people?”

0
RightOfSask 0 points ago +1 / -1

The longer it takes for the results of the Arizona audit takes to release, the more “irregularities” there were.

It's more likely that they didn't find anything yet. If they had found something that would overturn the results in Arizona, they would have screamed 24/7 on OAN.

Just so you know, there has NEVER been an audit like Arizona’s.

Yeah, because they don't know what they are even searching for. That's why they will never find something.

And you don't have to debate me. Just wait until till these audits are disappointments like everything else connected with Trump.

6
RightOfSask 6 points ago +7 / -1

If you read it in an incognito tab, you don't need an account for it.

0
RightOfSask 0 points ago +1 / -1

context of the MSM calling it "Russian disinformation".

They would have called it "Russian disinformation" either way, with or without censoring. Do you think CNN wouldn't have spin it the same way?

https://edition.cnn.com/2020/10/18/media/new-york-post-hunter-biden-reliable/index.html

"The NY Post sources aren't reliable, these are just rumours of rumours, they cooperated with Russian agents" ... the same points would have been made if Twitter didn't censor this story. Also Fox News is part of the MSM and they reported extensively on it.

If you really want to persuade people that the election was indeed rigged, then provide hard evidence. And not some "Dominion switched votes" theories which fall apart after a hand count or some retards in Arizona who scan every ballot under UV light for bamboo fibres. Because currently we have all this Qanon bullshit noise out there about raided servers in Germany and the involvement of the Italian government. There should be thousands and thousands of people involved in such a grand scheme to steal the election, and yet not a single one can be found.

0
RightOfSask 0 points ago +1 / -1

It was bigger because it was censored.

BBC, NPR, CNN, Fox News all of them reported about Twitter censoring this story. It was in the mainstream news because of that. It was everywhere. Censoring this story didn't limit the outreach.

1
RightOfSask 1 point ago +2 / -1

Twitter censoring this story made it spread like a wildfire. It had the exact opposite effect. Everybody knew about it. This story was never a threat.

-3
RightOfSask -3 points ago +1 / -4

Trump was never a threat to the establishment.

The most popular Facebook sites are from Conservatives like Ben Shapiro or Crowder. Fox News and OAN have as many viewers as CNN and MSNBC. Tucker Carlson and Rachel Maddow are neck and neck when it comes to the size of their audience. Under Trump companies like Google, Twitter and Facebook grew tremendously, breaking revenue record after revenue record.

The only reason that Trump lost the election is because he botched his Covid response and because he discouraged his voters from voting by mail. And now he blames the Deep State for his loss. At first it was Dominion who switched the votes in Georgia, but when they counted the ballots by hand, Biden still won. And if you take a look at Arizona ... the Republicans don't even know what they are searching for. They are searching now for months and still haven't found any election rigging that would overturn the results in Arizona. Even the Supreme Court Judges, which are stacked with 6 Conservative judges including three Trump picked himself, ruled against him.

In my opinion this will lead to another win for the Democrats in the next midterm elections. If everybody on the right is screaming that the elections are rigged and that their votes don't count, don't be surprised if people demoralized and don't show up to vote. Happened in the Georgia Senate runoffs and it will happen again.

1
RightOfSask 1 point ago +1 / -0

Three letter agencies were never stopped by that.

And why should the Deep State get rid of Trump? He shouted anti-globalist slogans left and right, but his policies were the exact opposite. Just look at how the new USMCA deal turned out. Almost doubled the US-Mexico in four years with no signs of slowing down. The trade sanctions against China were toothless and illegal immigration under Trump was as high as under Obama. If I worked for the Deep State I would let Trump be in office as long as possible. The perfect distraction. Just pretend to be an anti-globalist while doing everything possible to not only to maintain the status quo, but also to fortify their position.

4
RightOfSask 4 points ago +4 / -0

You know, at least if you look at Sophie, it doesn't hurt your eyes.

1
RightOfSask 1 point ago +1 / -0

Washington establishment wouldn't care for a ban either. If the "Deep State" was out for Trump, a ban on gain-of-function research wouldn't have mattered. They would have done it either way.

1
RightOfSask 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump could have easily won the election if he endorsed mail-in voting like the Democrats. He would have easily gained the votes he was missing to win some key states.

Oh, and the US deep state apparently funded the engineering of that virus.

It wasn't a secret that the US lifted the ban. Trump and his handlers could have done something. If Obama was able to ban funding for it, Trump would have been too.

0
RightOfSask 0 points ago +1 / -1

From what I've seen income is a far bigger divider than race. The problem is that we import people from the 3rd world to do our low income jobs. These people don't just stick together because of their ethnicity, but mainly because of how much money they make.

9
RightOfSask 9 points ago +9 / -0

I doubt that most Canadians even know how high our immigration levels are, especially compared to other Western countries. It seems like they just ask "are you okay with the current immigration level or do you want more or less". I wonder how this survey would look like if they put some numbers behind.

1
RightOfSask 1 point ago +1 / -0

That was just a review if the ban on funding gain-of-function research should be lifted or not. In December of 2017, 11 months after Trump's inauguration, it was decided to lift the ban.

1
RightOfSask 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why did the US government lift the ban on gain of function research none days before trump's inauguration?

As far as I know it was not lifted before Trump was inaugurated. It was lifted during the Trump admin.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-017-08837-7

13
RightOfSask 13 points ago +13 / -0

Round of applause for our guy Ford. That gravy train is never stopping.

1
RightOfSask 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are dozens of abandoned churches in Saskatchewan. Easy targets for these idiots.

1
RightOfSask 1 point ago +1 / -0

dragging the place down with codes of conduct and hiring quotas and other woke stuff

They are not dragging it down. They make record revenues and profits each year.

They now try to prevent others from rising by facilitating law changes that would mean they have to hire more diversity

There are no such laws in the US. All of that is done voluntarily. And I don't think you understand Start-Up culture in the US. No one of them wants to be a competitor to Google or Facebook. They want to be bought up.

They're not truly successful by a long shot.

Then you wouldn't see them as threat.

0
RightOfSask 0 points ago +2 / -2

Pfizer is mostly owned by Black Rock Inc.

https://www.marketscreener.com/quote/stock/PFIZER-INC-23365019/company/

Blackrock holds 2.31% of all shares of Pfizer.

Black Rock Inc is mostly owned by the Kuwaiti's and China Communist Party.

https://www.marketscreener.com/quote/stock/BLACKROCK-INC-11862/company/

Both of these hold 7.26% of all shares of Blackrock.

I doubt that you even know what "moslty" means. The Vanguard Group controls more of these two companies alone.

There is your Covid vaccination push.

Was Trump part of this Covid vaccine push? He was the one starting Operation Warpspeed.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›