1
WhyAreYouLikeThis 1 point ago +1 / -0

They provide immense value. If you don't believe me, just click on any one of their videos on YouTube and see all comments in support of them.

3
WhyAreYouLikeThis 3 points ago +3 / -0

Two people can perform the exact same action with one being a bribe and the other not based solely on the presence of some quid pro quo.

Simple example:

I'm speeding and get pulled over and a cop lets me off with a warning - not a bribe.

I'm speeding and get pulled over and I give the cop $100 and the cop lets me off with a warning - absolutely a bribe.

5
WhyAreYouLikeThis 5 points ago +5 / -0

Oh boy. Hate to be the one to break it to ya, but 24,000/1,240,000 = 1.94% is not the fatality rate for the Coronavirus. Let me explain.

The fatality rate of Coronavirus is the number of people killed by Coronavirus divided the number of people infected. 24,000 is not the number of people killed by Coronavirus, it is the number of people who have died with a positive test. So every person who died from anything else while having a positive test is counted in that 24,000. Furthermore, the number of people infected is not 1.2 million. That number is the amount of positive tests. Anyone who was infected and wasn't tested, such as the estimated 30% of asymptomatic people infected, are not counted in that 1.2 million figure.

So in reality, the actual fatality rate is (24,000 - people killed by other causes (cancer, heart disease, etc.) while having a positive test)/(1,200,000 + all infected people not tested). Therefore Coronavirus fatality rate << 1.94%. Closer to 0.5% and 80% of that 0.5% is over 80.

2
WhyAreYouLikeThis 2 points ago +4 / -2

Don't ask for a source here. Retards will get butthurt like:

"iT's ObViOuS. JuSt TaKe A lOoK aRoUnD."

If that's the way I thought and I didn't demand sources that I can personally evaluate, I'd just be reading CBC articles all day like every other retard who just accepts whatever they read.

6
WhyAreYouLikeThis 6 points ago +6 / -0

Seconded. I keep saying this and getting downvoted. I can't convince anyone of anything with a JPG.

3
WhyAreYouLikeThis 3 points ago +3 / -0

No. You might infect my grandpa and kill him. Sure, he's 95 and in the final stages of pancreatic cancer, but if he dies with covid, it will be the fault of children.

1
WhyAreYouLikeThis 1 point ago +1 / -0

If at this point in 2021 someone needs to be told "don't believe the polls", they should just kill themselves.

3
WhyAreYouLikeThis 3 points ago +3 / -0

Haha omfg. I went straight to the images before reading the comments here or on reddit. Because it was posted here, I assumed it was going to be some more of the typical "Trudeau is amazing and Conservatives are evil" propaganda. I was scanning through the text in the pictures for a few minutes thinking, "what am I missing? Why is OC.win pissed about this? It seems pretty accurate to me". And then I started reading the reddit comments ?.

Of course the simple truth throws those tards into full triggered mode. Who wouldn't be triggered by saying Trudeau increasing the M2 money supply by 20% "suggests" he's not fiscally responsible. That's actually generous af. It doesn't just suggest so, it clearly and undeniable proves it.

2
WhyAreYouLikeThis 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yup. Dupers delight is very real. Good point.

11
WhyAreYouLikeThis 11 points ago +11 / -0

I never understood the people who scream "how can you sleep at night" at politicians and CEOs and such after they're caught committing atrocities.

Like listen, screaming dumbasses, please google psychopath/sociopath and understand you mean nothing to these people. You have no value. Think about it like this. Imagine walking down the street and having someone scream at you "how can you walk all over those rocks and stones?!?! You're trampling all over them. Have you no conscience or soul?". You'd be like "wtf... They're just rocks and stones. Who gives a fuck if I walk over them". That's how psychopaths and sociopaths view everything that isn't them. They're equally as concerned about the value of everything that isn't them as you are about those rocks and stones. And expecting them to start caring about people is as idiotic as thinking you could convince people to not walk on rocks and stones.

11
WhyAreYouLikeThis 11 points ago +11 / -0

Ah, I see where all the unaccounted for BLM donation money goes.

3
WhyAreYouLikeThis 3 points ago +3 / -0

And no pictures of the robbers either. Why would you want to know what a violent criminal looks like? So you can cross the street if you see them? Well that would make you a racist.

2
WhyAreYouLikeThis 2 points ago +2 / -0

No big deal. This is just the auction of Canada to the highest (or least low) bidder.

1
WhyAreYouLikeThis 1 point ago +1 / -0

Firearms account for about 250-260 murders per year in Canada.

https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=3510006901

Of those, about 50 are from rifles or shotguns.

https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=3510007201

I searched StatCan for an hour for the breakdown of origin of crime guns, e.g. purchased by a PAL holder vs smuggled. Then I Googled it and found out it's not a stat they've kept.

www.cbc.ca/amp/1.5579971

Of course they don't. Why would knowing if guns used in crime are bought by PAL holding Canadians or smuggled in by criminals be useful in reducing gun crime ?? But lets keep talking about registries when we dont even keep this basic stat. Makes total sense.

Oh and if you're for banning guns because those deaths are still too many, then you logically have to support prohibition. Drunk drivers kill about 6x as many people than there are firearm murders.

nationalpost.com/news/canada/drunk-driving-is-canadas-deadliest-crime-and-one-of-our-most-lightly-punished/wcm/7997ee8d-43ee-4abb-a354-ce514149d071/amp/

But most Canadians won't jump on board there because they like drinking.

1
WhyAreYouLikeThis 1 point ago +1 / -0

Does anyone know the names of all of these people? I'd Google to find out, but we all know Google would go "Did you mean 'anti-black racism by whites?' I think that's what you meant. That is what you meant. That's what you get"

1
WhyAreYouLikeThis 1 point ago +2 / -1

Holy fuck. This article is from 2015. You expect people to dog through 6 years of info to find this source?

Thanks, Kirb, for bringing us this info from 6 fucking years ago. I guess trying to find the current data would be too much effort. Can't wait to see what other over half a decade old info you decide to elucidate us with. Big mystery why your lazy ass didn't include a link.

Tune in next week when Kirb let's us know Andrew Scheer's Conservatives lose the 2019 federal election.

-1
WhyAreYouLikeThis -1 points ago +1 / -2

Did I say use Snopes you fucking retard? It's not my job to go find the source for you because you're too dumb to include it.

Ya, you're really big brained expecting that instead of the OP including where they found thet info, every single user should go hunt it down. That makes sense. Idiot.

-3
WhyAreYouLikeThis -3 points ago +2 / -5

Holy fucking hell. How hard is it to provide a link or a source so everyone knows this isn't a shitty MS Paint drawing? For fucks sake.

This post aside, there are so many retards that have posted flat out incorrect shit on here that anyone who just accepts a fucking screen grab or jpg as evidence is equally retarded.

4
WhyAreYouLikeThis 4 points ago +4 / -0

I may have been more willing to grant him so extra charity had he only said, "There's a level of admiration I have for China growing their economy and rapidly increasing their standard of living" or something along those lines where he was strictly speaking about the ends. I would still think it's a fucking dumbass thing to say, but I could possibly write him off as just incredibly ignorant. However, the fact he specifically mentions the dictatorship, i.e. the means to those ends, tells me he's actually an evil piece of shit.

10
WhyAreYouLikeThis 10 points ago +10 / -0

Oh and if you're walking alone at night and you see a group of late teen to early 20 black guys in hoodies walking toward you, don't cross the street or you're racist. Despite the fact that, even without these stats, I'd cross the street if it was an identical group except they were white.

4
WhyAreYouLikeThis 4 points ago +4 / -0

I've got a great doctor. For just about literally everything I see her about, she always goes over sleep, nutrition and exercise and reiterates it's not that those will necessarily fix any problem, but they'll always help at the absolute very least.

Whenever I see her for a follow up and I tell her I haven't improved all those three things and still feel like shit, she hits me with the https://tinyurl.com/24myc97c

She's prescribed me certain medications, but always after making sure I'm eating, sleeping and exercising properly.

Why the news and public health experts aren't banging the same drum is ridiculous. I'm not an anti-vaxxer by any means, but it does make me nervous the way public health keeps talking only about the vaccine and not ever telling people to get regular sleep, go for a job and eat some veggies. Again, not that those will cure or prevent Covid, but they'll definitely improve outcomes.

1
WhyAreYouLikeThis 1 point ago +1 / -0

I thought lucille bluthe said $20?

2
WhyAreYouLikeThis 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm going to try to start making more posts and comments that not only spread information such as this, but also what we can do about it.

Here's what I'm doing about this Spotify nonsense. Spotify almost always streams music at a max bitrate of 160 kbps. On all my Spotify playlists, I have just under 1,500 songs. 1,500 songs total about 6,300 MBs. Even a slow internet download speed of 7 Mbps can handle 6,300 MB in about 2 hours. SD cards are so damn cheap now that you can grab a 64 GB card for 15 bucks. So for all of a $15 dollar SD card and a few hours of downloading, I have cut ties with Spotify forever. After 1.5 months of not paying Spotify $9.99, I've already recouped the cost of the SD card. Not to mention your options when using Spotify are 1) only have access to your songs when you have access to wifi or cell service, which Spotify then uses your bandwidth to stream or 2) have 100% access to your songs, but Spotify uses your bandwidth to download the song and uses your phone's storage to store the downloaded songs. Where's the advantage over just storing them on an SD card?

I've also done the exact same thing with TV shows and movies. Once Disney fired Gina Carano, it took me all of 8 minutes to cancel Disney+ and download the entire Mandalorian series. I have an 8 TB hard drive that can hold almost 4,000 hours of TV and movies. I don't watch a ton of TV and movies, but even if you watched 2 hours a day every single day, it would take you over 5 and a half years to watch all the TV and movies you can put on an 8 TB hard drive.

These fuckers think it's 2003 still and think internet speeds are still 10 KBps and hard drives are 16 GB and that I pay for Spotify, Netflix, etc. because I have no other option. I paid for them because I think it's the right thing to do to pay for services you use. But once they threw in with the wokeness and started launching attacks on myself and others like me... Ya, fuck that. Back to downloading for me.

view more: Next ›